aage wrote:zimmah wrote:Third, and don't see this as trying to play the empathy card, do you realize that this game might be quite hard for me because I have autism and therefore certain people skills don't come as natural to me as they come to you? I'm sincerely doing my best not to be a jerk, even though i might not be doing a very good job a it, so I'd appreciate it if at least you'd try to do the same, this game isn't about trolling, but about having fun right? I still love this game though, even though its pretty hard to play without getting emotionally involved.
No, I did not realise that, because I don't know anything about you as a person, because this is a message board... Strange assumption to make. I'll gladly admit I was trying to draw you out with a slight troll though, as I was interested in what would happen; this is what I do on day one. You having autism doesn't really change the situation, I think. Scumminess is scumminess, and tells are tells.
It seems sheep quoted the parts I considered quoting, thanks for that.
i thought it was well known around here, but that's okay.
well, technicaly yes, but i do not think my actions are scummy at all, especially because this is just how i play the game. i don't understand at least 60% of the jokes around here, probably more, while you guys seem to almost instantly know something is a joke, and something is not. leaving me to reply on something that was a joke, making me look stupid or scummy. also, i react differently to almost every single situation, which you guys interpret as scummy, while it's just my natural reaction. so it definitly makes a difference. therefore, even though scumminess is scummyness, and tells are tells, that doesn't mean that me having autism doens't change anything, because i behave way differently than any of you. in fact, every single person behaves in their own way, but the difference between me and aage for example are likely much more apart than the difference between aage and domyoshi, for example.
now on to sheeps post
first of all, i appreciate the fact that you actually took the time to make a real case instead of just pointing fingers, now we're getting somewhere at least.
sheepofdumb wrote:Zimmah, there's a lot of scum tells in your posts.zimmah wrote:I agree, doom is almost trying to get himself lynched. Could he be a jester?
Implying jesterzimmah wrote:i'm saying this because at the start of the game he asked to be a jester, and it'd be amazing coincidence if he would be one. I don't believe he is one though, but you can never be sure.
Backpedaling when criticized one post later.
I don't really see that as backpedaling, although i see why you'd say that. i was just explaining my initial post making it more clear why i posted it, although it may look like i'm backpedaling. The statement i wanted to make though, and which still remains, is that doom is not really contributing at all, he didn't even read the opening scene, and he seems to be trolling at the moment too, as he claims to have a scumread on IB, but refuses to give any sort of case, and i don't even understand what the rest of the post i quoted earlier is about. (and no, i'm not skimming, i just don't understand what yoshi is saying).
note: after reading aage's reponse i am starting to think yoshi was joking, but i don't really think that chances the case at all, because yoshi still hasn't contributed anything meaningful.
sheepofdumb wrote:zimmah wrote:i'm not even fabricating a case, if anything, [aage] is.
Petty finger pointing. Would be nothing but then we have this:zimmah wrote:Note that he mentions it are awful shots, while it were NPCs killed, which is usual for day 1 mod kills of non-players to set up the game, why would Rishead actually say something like this, it seems he's either inexperienced, confused, or trying to pull something scummy like making an opening for a PGO fakeclaim.
I already pointed to it earlier, but didn't follow up on it becaus I got distracted by other conversations.
So, by lack of something better vote rish
I'd say that's fabricating a case.
i don't really know what's wrong about voting rish, he does seem scummy, might be a slip of an SK, it's really the best bet right now in my opinion, i'm not even going to defend this, as i'm feeling pretty good about this statement, i'm not going to withdraw it just because one or two persons see it as scummy, and in fact, that might only make it more scummy anyway.
sheepofdumb wrote:zimmah wrote:it's not fun to play when everything i say is being turned against me, even when i play like i always do.zimmah wrote:isn't the point of the game to be critical?
So you can be critical and use anything someone says against them but when it happens to you, you cry foul.
i'm not sure but you may have a point here, i fail to see how this is scummy though. it's more like, what's the word? i don;t know what to call it really, but i don't really think it's scummy per se.
also, i'd like to say that i don't mind at all if you build cases like you do, with evidence and logic, but i do mind it when people just randomly vote me like jonty, or throw accusions towards me like aage. at least now we can talk about it peacefully.
sheepofdumb wrote:zimmah wrote:wouldn't be the first time i have to ask for a replacement early in the game because people start getting too personal against me either.
Don't play victim here. You know full well what you are getting into when you sign up for these games.zimmah wrote:it's not uncommon though, about every mafia game i have been in on this site i am being targeted day 1. no matter what i say or don't say.zimmah wrote:The one time were I was scum, I won. All the other times. Have been misty chef, most often because at least some mafia framed me and the rest just sheeps.
Wait, so mafia have been framing you day 1? I'm a little confused.
You get upset when town criticize you and blame mafia for constantly framing you. This is mafia. This is how the game is played.
You blame mafia for framing you, you blame town for being sheep (I resent that statement by the way), you blame town for criticizing you, and you blame people for getting too personal with you. So you blame people for playing them game and you get offended when you perceive it as a perceive it as a personal attack.
the problem is, that because many players around here know my meta (i tend to get pretty upset when people vote me or even harrass me for no reason at all), mafia either harrasses me, or waits until i feel attacked by a random townie and than anonymously throw fuel on the flames until i get lynched, because everyone knows the more you push me the more i bite, i know this is bad habit and i am trying my best to improve on it, but this is just how it is for now, it's not something you can change within a few posts/games. however, i fail to see why this behavior of mine is a scumtell, as there's nothing scummy about it.
furthermore, why is doom getting a 'this is just how doom plays' while i get 'look how scummy zim is' every game?
sheepofdumb wrote:zimmah wrote:he's not even posting anything useful yet he blames me for posting nothing useful
Oh, like these posts?zimmah wrote:what a bullshit logic is that, i'm being critical, therefore i'm scum, isn't the point of the game to be critical?zimmah wrote:How is "blame zimmah" the right question?zimmah wrote:i'm not even fabricating a case, if anything, he is.zimmah wrote:I suspect rish is SK, we won't know until (yes, I'm being obvious here)
1) he's lynched
2) he's killed (unlikely)
3) some combined efforts reveal him as such (unlikely)
4) cop reveals him (pretty unlikely as well, even if for the sake of argument we even assume we do have one)
5) someone else flips SK (which pretty much proves him innocent, or at least not SK)
6) game ends and his role is revealed
You can replace rish with anyone and the same logic applies. It's an incredibly weak argument and only serves to make you look scummy.
actually no, because rish is the only one who posted something a SK could potentially do, it'd be a terribly bad move, but he might have miscalculated or slipped, it's probably not the first time someone slips that early. I mean, trying to get away with claiming PGO by misleading town could be something an SK could try, SK is a risky role to play anyway, might not even be the worst move to try to pull something day 1.
sheepofdumb wrote:zimmah wrote:and you [aage] also seem to be on a quest to make me look bad.
No, you are doing that yourself just fine.
There's an incredible amount of doubletalk in your posts. I don't know what role you are, or your alignment. But the amount of doubletalking scum tells is enough to get you lynched.
doubletalk? i don't really think i do change my opinion that often, also, i don't really see anything lynchworthy in my posts.
gregwolf121 wrote:i think it important to remember that this is a game and no matter what your role is it isn't you as a person, so no it isn't personal, we accuse the role and lynch scummy roles, but this doesn't reflect on you as a person.
anyways just feel like saying that because it seems that you are taking it personally
so right now zimmah does seem pretty scummy but, i don't think he is, basically because i would expect scum to stop posting or change how they are playing the game when they have drawn this much attention but hes stayed the same. i think rish was just speculating about the PGO/SK thing, but i would personally say SK than PGO,
also as a heads up ill be out of town starting this friday till june 2, so my internet connection will be sporadic during those days, but i will check in when i can.
at least 3 different persons say i am acting scummy, but what exactly is scummy about my posts?