by chewyman on Wed May 09, 2007 5:46 pm
2dimes wrote:chewyman wrote:2dimes wrote:luns101 wrote:2dimes wrote: "love their nieghbor."
That was Jesus Himself who said that.
Nope I think he said neighbor.
Actually, I'm pretty sure he wasn't speaking English at all you nob-jockey, let alone American English

Well if you wish to nit pick and you go back to the original Greek, which the man that may have existed, might have spoken, if it is indeed a language, it may mean, "throw the jew down the well." provided there is a way to translate such a thing, into a language that exists in some form today or yesterday.
Actually it was Aramaic. There is no disagreement amongst scholars that Jesus existed as this is supported both by followers and independent first hand sources such as Roman texts. While he may not necessarily have said an exact translation of those words the message is clearly the same. Ancient Greek definitely was a language, so was Aramaic, how you can think any otherwise despite all the thousands of texts found is beyond me. Translations are of a very high quality when translating from the earlier Greek texts (the New Testament was most likely written in Greek, which was, at the time, a language much like English is today). The only trouble translating such a well understood language is that some ideas do not perfectly match up in another language, this is rarely the case and certainly isn't as drastic as converting 'love thy neighbour' to 'throw the Jew down the well'.
Btw, you call him nit-picking? Your the one who corrected a spelling, wrongly btw. Its neighbour.
True, but we have to make exceptions for ignorant Americans

If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?