IronE.GLE wrote:I see your point, however I'm specifically talking about instances when I have 20 or so armies and try to take over 6 territories with 1 army each. More often than not, when I'm finished taking over those 6 territories I end up with 4 or 5 armies left of the original 20. I realize that I'm leaving 5 behind to occupy conquered territories, but I'm still losing 9 or 10 armies to the 6 defending armies. Now say that I have 20 and am attacking 3 countries, one with 12 armies and the other two with 1 army each. More often than not, I'll lose only 1 or 2 armies to the main force of 12, then lose 4 or 5 straight rolls to the 1 countries with army on them. It's quite frustrating as I'd rather lose a few more to the larger force so that I don't feel like my soldiers got drunk after the first battle.
I think I understand what you're saying. The only thing I could say about that is maybe we remember the rolls where we expect to advance more than the rolls when we don't expect to advance.
For example, if I'm attacking 10v4, I'm not expecting to advance after my first attack, in fact, I'm actually expecting to lose a few armies in my series of attacks. I'm going to remember if I don't conquer the conquer but I'm going to be more forgiving over a few loses.
On the other hand, if I'm attacking 8 v 1, I'm actually expecting to advance after my first attack. If I don't win the first attack I remember it because I actually expected to. If I lose the second attack, then it becomes engraved on my memory.
I guess I'm saying that what you're experiencing may just be a natural part of human psychology in that we tend to remember unexpected things more easily, things that surprised us rather than things that we expected to happen.
Get some sleep, you want to have a clear head when you're playing here.
