Simpsons Mafia (8 of 13) Endgame, Town Win!

by **Djfireside** on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:15 pm

I think he was being helpful by asking if we are going to force someone to claim. So being the first to say it as his first post.

UNVOTE VOTE BK

by **dazza2008** on Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:00 pm

Vote Count

pmchugh(1) - ShaggyDan
ckyrias(2) - pancakemix, pretender77
pretender77(1) - safariguy5
BlackKnight_6(4) - Ragian, pmchugh, LSU Tiger Josh, Djfireside L-3
LSU Tiger Josh(2) - thechuck51, ckyrias

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: 14 June 10pm UK time.

by **safariguy5** on Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:59 pm

Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.

unvote

by **Ragian** on Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:41 pm

Well ... it's (almost) random pressure day. I usually go with one of the quiet ones to be honest. Neither CLEVER nor Shaggy has posted since Wednesday.

*tosses coin*

unvote vote shaggy

by **ShaggyDan** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:01 am

Ragain overlooking pancakemix? Hasn't posted since tuesday.

pancakemix wrote:...da fuq?

Vote Cykrias

Methinks some are taking this too far.

pancakemix wrote:
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:
ckyrias wrote:unvote

i will be off the next 36 hours approximately. mod is notified.

leaving as the pressure grows.
scumtell

Maybe, but 36 hours is a specific amount of time. I'm not one to lynch someone in absentia either.

So elementary dear Watson; Ragian and Pancakemix are scum partners! *Dramatic Music*

... well most probably not, but still Unvote and Vote Pancakemix.

by **Ragian** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:01 am

I did over look him. Thank you, Shaggy (although I'm surprised it took a vote for you to participate - IGMEOY).

Anyway ... to be true to what I said: unvote vote pancakemix

by **dazza2008** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:26 am

Vote Count

ckyrias(2) - pancakemix, pretender77
BlackKnight_6(3) - pmchugh, LSU Tiger Josh, Djfireside
LSU Tiger Josh(2) - thechuck51, ckyrias
pancakemix(2) - ShaggyDan, Ragian

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: 14 June 10pm UK time.

by **pershy** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:26 am

OK Ragian - but it could also be that you're worried about your scum buddy being lynched. You were the 1st to vote BK and now you've retracted your vote when he gets to L-3.

Of course you could just be making the point that the quieter ones should be pressured, but it seems that BK is the town elected pressure guy for D-1....so let's get a claim.

vote BK

by **Ragian** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:25 am

I don't have a problem with BK claiming, Pershy :lol:

I think that's reaching for straws. Even if he were my scummate (I'm not scum, I don't know what he is), what are the odds that he would claim scum?

I could just as well turn it around, saying that you're protecting your pancake scumbuddy by forcing BK to claim since scum know whose not scum (i.e. town/3rd party). It's doesn't really make sense at this point though. Is that what's called WIFOM?

Either way, as you well know, Pershy baby, we usually target silent ones and force a claim out of them. Shaggy, whom I felt wasn't around, rightfully pointed out that PCmix hasn't said anything since Tuesday. I'd rather force a scumariner to claim than an unknown, but present player.

by **Some7hingCLEVER** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 11:31 am

Ragian wrote:Well ... it's (almost) random pressure day. I usually go with one of the quiet ones to be honest. Neither CLEVER nor Shaggy has posted since Wednesday.

*tosses coin*

unvote vote shaggy

hey sorry i posted in vacation thread so sorry. i am moving today jsut wantedt o read up and ill post something more tonight.

by **pancakemix** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:10 pm

All I'll say is that it's been a damn busy week.

by **pmchugh** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:00 pm

safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.

unvote

Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs

) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?

by **safariguy5** on Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:26 pm

pmchugh wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.

unvote

Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs ) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?

Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.

by **dazza2008** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:47 am

Vote Count

ckyrias(2) - pancakemix, pretender77
BlackKnight_6(4) - pmchugh, LSU Tiger Josh, Djfireside, pershy L-3
LSU Tiger Josh(2) - thechuck51, ckyrias
pancakemix(2) - ShaggyDan, Ragian

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: 14 June 10pm UK time.

by **BlackKnight_6** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:36 am

vote pancakemix to encourage participation.

(says the guy who has hardly participated since pmchugh started a bandwagon against him for it :evil:

)

by **pmchugh** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:06 am

safariguy5 wrote:
pmchugh wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.

unvote

Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs ) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?

Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.

Pretty weak? There is no real reason for it, at least when people give reasons and arguments (albeit weak ones) you can separate those hopping on the BW from those genuinely trying to do something. You know as well as anyone that if you get someone to claim for virtually no reason then you are back at square one, or else you pick someone on the BW to vote next. Right now I do not have enough to want BK to claim, and I am v surprised you are going along with this.

unvote vote saf

by **pretender77** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:42 pm

i feel that although pancake has given us nothing to work with. hes gonnaa be their later in the game if an easy lynch is needed. unvote vote bk

by **pancakemix** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:59 pm

pretender77 wrote:i feel that although pancake has given us nothing to work with. hes gonnaa be their later in the game if an easy lynch is needed. unvote vote bk

...really? Not my fault I've got other obligations...

Perhaps you're forgetting that the cykiras case got totally dropped when BK rolled around (not to say the pursuit of him is invalid, but still).

by **safariguy5** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:31 pm

pmchugh wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:
pmchugh wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.

unvote

Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs ) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?

Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.

Pretty weak? There is no real reason for it, at least when people give reasons and arguments (albeit weak ones) you can separate those hopping on the BW from those genuinely trying to do something. You know as well as anyone that if you get someone to claim for virtually no reason then you are back at square one, or else you pick someone on the BW to vote next. Right now I do not have enough to want BK to claim, and I am v surprised you are going along with this.

unvote vote saf

I think you're overreacting here, I never actually voted bk, I simply said I would be willing to vote him if we were going to.

Personally, I think pursuing ckyrias would have been better. Reason being that he bandwagonned, but then again, half the people in this game could be considered bandwagonners. So really, there's nothing substantive that I see, and between no lynching because we can't find anyone scummy and at least getting a claim to end day 1, I'll take the claim over the no lynch any day.

by **pershy** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:34 pm

Ragian wrote:I could just as well turn it around, saying that you're protecting your pancake scumbuddy by forcing BK to claim since scum know whose not scum (i.e. town/3rd party). It's doesn't really make sense at this point though. Is that what's called WIFOM?

you're funny Rage - my pancake buddy! I'm gonna call pancake mix that from now on even tho I don't know whether he's on my side or not yet. I'll happily vote pancake too tho. At this point we haven't got much to go on. Why did people vote him in the first place? Oh yeah -for being quiet no? CK has been accused of bandwagoning.

I agree with what Safari guy just said. Ck could actually be a good person to pressure - but seems that BK is the one who is L-3. So what have you got to say for yourself BK?

by **dazza2008** on Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:56 pm

Vote Count

ckyrias(1) - pancakemix
BlackKnight_6(4) - LSU Tiger Josh, Djfireside, pershy, pretender77 L-3
LSU Tiger Josh(2) - thechuck51, ckyrias
pancakemix(3) - ShaggyDan, Ragian, BlackKnight_6
safariguy5(1) - pmchugh

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: 14 June 10pm UK time.

by **ckyrias** on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:08 am

so who do we want to claim? BK or pancake? i wanna know who to vote. cause if i vote BK i will be joining the bwagon if i vote pancake it will be OMGUS vote. either way someone will use it against me at some point!

by **Ragian** on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:59 am

Pancake talked unvote

Also, side note: when I leave for the Ukraine in a couple of hours, Epitaph1 is playing for me in this game. So from now on, when I post, it'll be him being me ... or something to that effect.

by **BlackKnight_6** on Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 am

pershy wrote:I agree with what Safari guy just said. Ck could actually be a good person to pressure - but seems that BK is the one who is L-3. So what have you got to say for yourself BK?

OK. This is the first time I'm playing with many of you. I only have my clan games to go on, and they are often very similar on D1, because we all know each other so well. Gotta admit I was surprised to have so much attention come onto me for suggesting we move past the jokevote stage. That kind of a thing can give more information later on, for example on Day2.

I don't think I should claim yet. I'm at L-3. I went along with the vote on pancakemix to get him to participate, and he has now.

I would have to reread the ckyrias bit from the beginning, but his last post strikes me as a bit nervous.

unvote
vote ckyrias

by **pershy** on Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:00 am

lol - so CK doesn't get accused of bandwagoning or OMGUS - but of being nervous :lol:

Well I guess he does sound a bit cautious. Could be a scum tell, or slightly paranoid townie

Simpsons Mafia (8 of 13) Endgame, Town Win!

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Re: Simpsons Mafia (13 of 13) Day 1

Who is online