Moderator: Community Team
Fo Sho wrote:I think one of the reasons we have so many problems with drinking for teenagers is because it's such a taboo thing to do. Because all these kids think that it is so cool and new and whatever they drink to excess. In Europe and other countries kids are around alcohol all their lives, usually just the occasional beer from their parents or wine with meals or whatever. I agree that it should be 18...
Fo Sho wrote:I think one of the reasons we have so many problems with drinking for teenagers is because it's such a taboo thing to do. Because all these kids think that it is so cool and new and whatever they drink to excess. In Europe and other countries kids are around alcohol all their lives, usually just the occasional beer from their parents or wine with meals or whatever. I agree that it should be 18...
Jamie wrote:21 is not some random number picked by law makers. 21 is the age the human brain finishes its growth cycle, and is done developing. Alcohol is unsafe to drink before this takes place, as it inhibits development of the brain, if the brain isn't already done doing so. The drinking age in the US will NEVER be lowered, unless new medical research proves a new theory, or the US congress disbands the FDA.
Backglass wrote:Jamie wrote:21 is not some random number picked by law makers. 21 is the age the human brain finishes its growth cycle, and is done developing. Alcohol is unsafe to drink before this takes place, as it inhibits development of the brain, if the brain isn't already done doing so. The drinking age in the US will NEVER be lowered, unless new medical research proves a new theory, or the US congress disbands the FDA.
Bullshit. This sounds like the "Reefer Madness" type propaganda told at church youth group meetings. Please post links to your medical assertion of brain development ceasing at 21 and alcohol being unsafe to those 18-21. More invented facts.
Are you saying that the rest of the world is brain damaged due to their 18 year old (or less) drinking age?
luns101 wrote:I offer a compromise:
1. Let's lower the drinking age to 18.
2. Let's raise the voting age to 25.
vtmarik wrote:luns101 wrote:I offer a compromise:
1. Let's lower the drinking age to 18.
2. Let's raise the voting age to 25.
Only if we institute mandatory driver's tests for everyone who reaches the age of senior citizenship (65 in the US).
s.xkitten wrote:vtmarik wrote:luns101 wrote:I offer a compromise:
1. Let's lower the drinking age to 18.
2. Let's raise the voting age to 25.
Only if we institute mandatory driver's tests for everyone who reaches the age of senior citizenship (65 in the US).
you stole that from me
vtmarik wrote:luns101 wrote:I offer a compromise:
1. Let's lower the drinking age to 18.
2. Let's raise the voting age to 25.
Only if we institute mandatory driver's tests for everyone who reaches the age of senior citizenship (65 in the US).
Jenos Ridan wrote:The only sour point, the 25 voting age. 21 makes a lot more sence. Other than that, all good.
Jenos Ridan wrote:vtmarik wrote:luns101 wrote:I offer a compromise:
1. Let's lower the drinking age to 18.
2. Let's raise the voting age to 25.
The only sour point, the 25 voting age. 21 makes a lot more sence. Other than that, all good.
luns101 wrote:The general point I was making is that even at 18 years of age, people think they are more mature than they actually are. Almost all of us think that way around age 18.
Generally, when people get 3 more years of life experience under their belts they tend to think and act a little differently, which might affect the way they vote. 21 sounds like a good age to allow voting.
Backglass wrote:luns101 wrote:The general point I was making is that even at 18 years of age, people think they are more mature than they actually are. Almost all of us think that way around age 18.
Generally, when people get 3 more years of life experience under their belts they tend to think and act a little differently, which might affect the way they vote. 21 sounds like a good age to allow voting.
I tend to agree with you luns, but I believe there should be one age for everything. Why are you an adult for something, and not for others? Whatever that legal age is, it should be the same for joining the military, driving, drinking, going to prison as opposed to "juvi", etc. If your an adult...your an adult.
I do think however that it should be mandatory to wait until 30 to get married or have children.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
luns101 wrote:
[...] The general point I was making is that even at 18 years of age, people think they are more mature than they actually are. Almost all of us think that way around age 18.
Generally, when people get 3 more years of life experience under their belts they tend to think and act a little differently, which might affect the way they vote. 21 sounds like a good age to allow voting. A friend of mine told me that he found stats to prove that the voting block of 18 -21 yrs of age has gone down in every presidential election since the passage of the 26th amendment. I'll have to look into it. Anyone else heard that as well?
got tonkaed wrote:although sobriety works for you sir, many would actually like to drink every now and then (for some maybe its actually every single now and then)
Numia Kereru wrote:got tonkaed wrote:although sobriety works for you sir, many would actually like to drink every now and then (for some maybe its actually every single now and then)
I'm with you
Anyway, the drinking age here was 20 right up until 1999. Then they lowered it to 18. I had a bastard of a time trying to get into pubs and clubs as an 18 year old. Why couldn't the age have been lowered before I turned 20?? Bastards, I tell ya
flashleg8 wrote:Numia Kereru wrote:got tonkaed wrote:although sobriety works for you sir, many would actually like to drink every now and then (for some maybe its actually every single now and then)
I'm with you
Anyway, the drinking age here was 20 right up until 1999. Then they lowered it to 18. I had a bastard of a time trying to get into pubs and clubs as an 18 year old. Why couldn't the age have been lowered before I turned 20?? Bastards, I tell yaI can see why your pissed off!
Same with me about the UKs licensing laws. Its legal to drink up the park or in out of the way places at night as long as you either: get your big brother to buy the carryout or; have a friend that can grow a mustache. You can drink in dodgy slum pubs whenever your voice breaks and in village pubs as long as you live in the village and your dad either: doesn’t drink in the pub or; buys you pints when you go in.
Night clubs are a bit shit though. You have to go through a perfunctory "where have you been tonight, mate" and "how many pints have you had" check even before you get to the age questions.
All these only apply to men though. Apparently as soon as a girl has tits she can wear a short skirt and get in anywhere.
flashleg8 wrote:luns101 wrote:
[...] The general point I was making is that even at 18 years of age, people think they are more mature than they actually are. Almost all of us think that way around age 18.
Generally, when people get 3 more years of life experience under their belts they tend to think and act a little differently, which might affect the way they vote. 21 sounds like a good age to allow voting. A friend of mine told me that he found stats to prove that the voting block of 18 -21 yrs of age has gone down in every presidential election since the passage of the 26th amendment. I'll have to look into it. Anyone else heard that as well?
I firmly believe people should be allowed to vote from 16 years old. At this age people are mature enough to know their own mind (in law). Though they might not have as much "life experience" as older people, they should have a say in how society is governed because at this age they are beginning to contribute to society. People at this age are either leaving school to enter the workforce or choosing to study further, either way their voice should be heard as government policies will directly effect them.
I understand your argument about voter apathy in the younger vote but I believe the voting turnout percentage would increase if younger people felt more included in the political process. I can't speak for the US, but in the UK all the major political parties fight over the "grey" vote by introducing many policies focused on pensioners while few (if any) policies are directed towards the 16-25 year olds. This is because historically the pensioners have a high voter turn out, while the 18-25 year old vote has a low turn out. What’s the point of making eye-catching policies focused towards people who aren’t going to vote for your party anyway?
If people were included in politics at school age - not just taught about it - they would feel more empowered to demand policies focused towards their needs and if voting percentages did rise the politicians would be forced to create more youth friendly policies.
If you want a current example of how the youth vote can be vitalised you need only look towards the French Presidential election of a few days ago. There was an 85% turn out at the first stage. With massive numbers of first time voters and young people registering and turning out. This is partly due to the policies that have/or are threatening to be implemented that will effect school leavers and people starting employment for the first time (along with the desire from the left to avoid the repeat of the Le Pen fiasco).
At present the 18-25 apathy vote will begin to turn into a 25-40 apathy vote over time - we must do more to strengthen or democratic process or else it becomes increasingly pointless.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users