Moderator: Community Team

 Some7hingCLEVER
				Some7hingCLEVER
			everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		Some7hingCLEVER wrote:vig was my number one choice but I didn't get it

 Some7hingCLEVER
				Some7hingCLEVER
			drunkmonkey wrote:everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.
That actually does help, as it narrows the field down to 6 people.



 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		drunkmonkey wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.
That actually does help, as it narrows the field down to 6 people.
I meant to quote CLEVER. I was wondering why he said it didn't help much.

 Some7hingCLEVER
				Some7hingCLEVER
			Alt1978 ā 11
MoB ā 14 (replaced by drunkmonkey)
Djfireside ā 17
Soundman ā 22
Nagerous - 6
Dazza ā 6
Somethingclever ā 9


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		drunkmonkey wrote:If vig was CLEVER's first choice, but he didn't get it, that means someone above him took it. Here's the top of the list.Alt1978 ā 11
MoB ā 14 (replaced by drunkmonkey)
Djfireside ā 17
Soundman ā 22
Nagerous - 6
Dazza ā 6
Somethingclever ā 9
I'm not the vig. Assuming CLEVER's telling the truth, either atl1978, Djfireside, soundman, nagerous or dazza got the vig role.



 dazza2008
				dazza2008
			






















 
		
 Some7hingCLEVER
				Some7hingCLEVER
			
 pmchugh
				pmchugh
			






















 
		pmchugh wrote:
I have a feeling that no one will own up to being the vig, in which case we scum hunt between them. We make cases and decide who we each would like to claim first. If they pass then we move on to the next player.

 everywhere116
				everywhere116
			


 
		Trying to let more people get killed?everywhere116 wrote:Pretty much. Even if the vig is town, with no doctor he is screwed if he comes out, barring some other unforeseen protection. We also don't have enough reason to declare one way or the other that the vig is scum. One faulty nightkill is standard, albeit ill-advised on night 1. For these reasons I will echo what I said on day 1: "I support you in this endeavor and think that the vig deserves some scrutiny. On Day 3. First we lynch ghost."
With another possible night kill we also would have more info.

 spiesr
				spiesr
			











 
		
 everywhere116
				everywhere116
			


 
		everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.

 Some7hingCLEVER
				Some7hingCLEVER
			everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.

 pmchugh
				pmchugh
			






















 
		 .
.
 ghostly447
				ghostly447
			 
		pmchugh wrote:everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.

 everywhere116
				everywhere116
			


 
		
 alt1978
				alt1978
			






















 
		everywhere116 wrote:pmchugh wrote:everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.
Hmm. While the line I underlined is pretty conclusive evidence that you are on crack, I can see your logic behind wanting to lynch a scum vig rather than a normal scum (and if ghostly is scum he is most likely the framer). You want to decrease the rate at which townies die. I can understand that.
alt1978 wrote:In response to the conversation going on...I am not the vig. It's location on my list doesn't much matter since I got my first pick...but for the record it was 7th. That may seem a little high for town...but i had a pretty good understanding of the role so that's why i put it there.
In response to the general idea by pmc...I think it's a really good one. If nothing else...this is going to pin folks down to going on the record for x, y, and z. The idea specifically that I am referring to is the rate of attrition...so to stop the bleeding if you will...tracking down the vig has a ton of merit.

 pmchugh
				pmchugh
			






















 
		 Djfireside
				Djfireside
			

























 
		

 nagerous
				nagerous
			


















 
		

 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

 edocsil
				edocsil
			



 
		edocsil wrote:pmchugh wrote:Yes that would be nice. Is there anyone who can narrow the vig window down?
Also, if the vig is town he should just straight up claim and explain why he killed or place blame on the JOAT if he didn't.
This could work.
edocsil wrote:2) somebody's lying ~ duh? Not like the vig is gonna claim...


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		 
 

 nagerous
				nagerous
			


















 
		pmchugh wrote:everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.


 soundman
				soundman
			

















 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users