clapper011 wrote:sighs... please stop using GLG's former name on the site. It is his personal information of which he doesnt wish to have in the forums.
whaaaa?!!! he had a prior username?!!! whaaaaaa?!!!! i had no idea!!! wow!!!!-el Jesus negro
Moderator: Community Team
clapper011 wrote:sighs... please stop using GLG's former name on the site. It is his personal information of which he doesnt wish to have in the forums.
danryan wrote:I think if you could, you would. No offense but it's easy to slag these guys for cheap tactics, which they undoubtedly engage in, but the truth of the matter is you still have to be good to win that much. Whether it's Blitz dominating Pelo War or Herpes slamming City Mogul, every Conqueror we've had can flat out play. Are there better players that haven't made conqueror? Sure, josko.ri, Master Fenrir, Chariot of Fire, Rodion, etc all fit that bill. But don't kid yourself that anyone can do it.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:sdh wrote:Just want to know how many players think they could get to Conqueror if they really tried or wanted to. Also how many players think they will someday make it to Conqueror,and it's just a matter of time![]()
(I personally know I will never get close unless I use the methods of GLG or rabbiton, which I am not willing to do)
been there and done it twice. 1st time was prior to the "conqueror" rank being created. Really have no interest in doing it a 3rd time.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Could I? Yes, been there done that. . .but
Warning: a LOT of BS and aggravation comes with it. If you play by rules, people challenge the rules. If you focus on one map, someone complains. If you play team games, others complain. No pleasing everybody -- and particularly a vocal group of 30-50 peops that think the world revolves around their opinion.
Prediction:
next new conquerer: Braddy - currently in 3rd; has been coming up strong in score; sets up tons of trips games
Up and coming possible Conquerors: Lanyards and/or NoSurvivors -- IF they concentrate and chose to have less fun. Oh, and Josko.ri and MC etc., if they wanted to, could easily wipe my score up.
After Conqueror?: Emperor, just like on Starwars. . . Or Caesar, like Rome.
*sdh (and others), AGAIN please quit using my REAL NAME on CC posts. Per King Achilles, you will be warned then punished.
chang50 wrote:I reckon there are very few players with the ability and the singlemindedness to do it,although there are plenty who are deluded enough to think they could if only they were prepared to do xy and z.
AndyDufresne wrote:I know I certainly won't get there, since I don't play many team games, and I'm sure it'd take a while playing 1vs1!
--Andy
sdh wrote::lol: what is this game about Game 10565527
HAWKE1422: we joined them. they did not have a chocie on who they got no no bad on them
(it's a private game)
comic boy wrote:There are a number of players on this site who dont play freestyle or farm yet are consistently ranked in the top 20 , contrary to general perception they play a mix of standard and team games.
On a given day they can each beat each other and they are in my estimation the most talented players on this site , most conquerors can accumulate points ( which is an achievement ) but dont have the playing skills of those immediately below them.
comic boy wrote:There are a number of players on this site who dont play freestyle or farm yet are consistently ranked in the top 20 , contrary to general perception they play a mix of standard and team games.
DiM wrote:comic boy wrote:There are a number of players on this site who dont play freestyle or farm yet are consistently ranked in the top 20 , contrary to general perception they play a mix of standard and team games.
yeah but who do they play those games against? and what kind of games are those?
how many of those players could keep their rank if they started a bunch of public random games (random map random settings)?
my bet is that none of them. yeah sure they're great players but staying that high requires certain sacrifices.
JBlombier wrote:People overestimate themselves a lot in this thread. I'm pretty sure that whatever system I invent and no matter how much time I spent using that system, I wouldn't make it to the absolute top, to be number 1. I can't find the concentration to play every game like my life depends on it. And I'm probably not good enough to invent a system that guarantees me anything. Mind you, if I could do it, I still wouldn't, because it seems rather boring to me. But that's not the point I'm trying to make here. My point is that I, and a lot of others, just suck a little too much to ever become number 1. We should all just accept this.
DiM wrote:comic boy wrote:There are a number of players on this site who dont play freestyle or farm yet are consistently ranked in the top 20 , contrary to general perception they play a mix of standard and team games.
yeah but who do they play those games against? and what kind of games are those?
how many of those players could keep their rank if they started a bunch of public random games (random map random settings)?
my bet is that none of them. yeah sure they're great players but staying that high requires certain sacrifices.
safariguy5 wrote:Couldn't do it even if I wanted to. The amount of time and patience it takes to accumulate all those points would suck the fun out of the game.
Robinette wrote:Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
Depends on what metric you use...
The coolest is squishyg
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users