Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Sorry, we don't give out participation awards.
natty_dread wrote:I suggest you enroll to the Society of Cooks. They will teach you basic strategy for escalating games, which will help you win some games.
you got diced wrote:natty_dread wrote:I suggest you enroll to the Society of Cooks. They will teach you basic strategy for escalating games, which will help you win some games.
like i said before, if you think you have strategy, you can play some games on this account.
if you refuse, then keep quiet because obviously you know you are draining your bank account in order to win these online games
blakebowling wrote:you got diced wrote:natty_dread wrote:I suggest you enroll to the Society of Cooks. They will teach you basic strategy for escalating games, which will help you win some games.
like i said before, if you think you have strategy, you can play some games on this account.
if you refuse, then keep quiet because obviously you know you are draining your bank account in order to win these online games
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
We pay for the ability to play more than four games at a time.
The reason you're not winning any games is because you aren't stacking any troops, but just attacking out each turn. Which usually doesn't work on most maps. (You can blame the dice for stopping rushing, that's fine).
CC is fair however, the dice generator is the same for everyone.
Jippd wrote:Check the scoreboard and you will see there are freemiums among the top 100 on this site. Sometimes it is easier to blame the things we cannot control then blaming ourselves. Perhaps those of us that are premium and have more games played that 700 may have a little better strategy than you and that may be why you lose some games.
As your IGN suggest though, risk is A LOT about the dice. Hell the whole game is controlled by dice. So if you don't like a game controlled by dice, risk may not be the best option for you.
People also tend to notice the bad more then the good.
you got diced wrote:
To my good Sir and to those who read this in the future,
Please evaluate the scoreboard as you have advised me. As one can apparently see, most of the members on the top 100 are indeed premiums. How can you say that it is of significant value when the majority of the scoreboard leaders are premiums?
My good sir, as you have spoken quiet clearly, I am to believe that because of your high rank of a colonel, you have strategy that allows you to win games? If that be the case than very well enunciated for I have made the generous offer of my account in the subject of account sitting to any whom believe to have said strategy.
Thenceforth, simply send me a private message through the "Inbox" setting of your account and I shall responsibly, and with speed, entrust to you the authority of my account until you have acquired the rank of lieutenant. With the acquisition of said rank, you shall return to me the full privileges of my account so that I may take pleasure in seeing that the rank of my previously owned account rank of private has been delightfully promoted to that of a lieutenant.
Sincerely and yours truly,
a humble Conquerclub member,
you got diced
you got diced wrote:natty_dread wrote:I suggest you enroll to the Society of Cooks. They will teach you basic strategy for escalating games, which will help you win some games.
like i said before, if you think you have strategy, you can play some games on this account.
if you refuse, then keep quiet because obviously you know you are draining your bank account in order to win these online games
Powercrazy wrote: However look at win ratios if you want the true picture of who is good and who just plays a lot.
natty_dread wrote:Powercrazy wrote: However look at win ratios if you want the true picture of who is good and who just plays a lot.
Win ratios?
A 30% win ratio is really good for someone who mainly plays 6-8 player games, while it's really bad for someone who mainly plays 1v1.
Besides, playing well only gets you to a major rank, maybe colonel at best. To get any higher, you need to specialize, and restrict your play to only certain maps & settings which you know really well.
chapcrap wrote:natty_dread wrote:Powercrazy wrote: However look at win ratios if you want the true picture of who is good and who just plays a lot.
Win ratios?
A 30% win ratio is really good for someone who mainly plays 6-8 player games, while it's really bad for someone who mainly plays 1v1.
Besides, playing well only gets you to a major rank, maybe colonel at best. To get any higher, you need to specialize, and restrict your play to only certain maps & settings which you know really well.
Maybe he meant kill ratio... It's a stat that Map Rank gives. If that's what he meant, then fine. If he really meant win ratio, then I'm with natty.
natty_dread wrote:And while map rank is nice, it's not infallible either...
chapcrap wrote:Maybe he meant kill ratio... It's a stat that Map Rank gives. If that's what he meant, then fine. If he really meant win ratio, then I'm with natty.
sols wrote:chapcrap wrote:Maybe he meant kill ratio... It's a stat that Map Rank gives. If that's what he meant, then fine. If he really meant win ratio, then I'm with natty.
What is Map Rank? Cant say ive ever heard of it.
chapcrap wrote:sols wrote:chapcrap wrote:Maybe he meant kill ratio... It's a stat that Map Rank gives. If that's what he meant, then fine. If he really meant win ratio, then I'm with natty.
What is Map Rank? Cant say ive ever heard of it.
It an addon for Firefox that can calculate your stats on different maps and settings for you. You can find some information on it in the Tools section.
eeww wrote:just lost 7v1.... conquerclub is full of Shiite ( an actual religious group so no you can NOT CLOSE MY ACCOUNT FOR LANGUAGE)
eeww wrote:just lost 7v1.... conquerclub is full of Shiite ( an actual religious group so no you can NOT CLOSE MY ACCOUNT FOR LANGUAGE)
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: FranzBalle