Anarkistsdream wrote:So I am done with this discussion.
Probably for the best. You seem to be too emotionally invested in it.
Moderator: Community Team
Anarkistsdream wrote:So I am done with this discussion.
Jgood wrote:Two of the biggest attacks on US soil were done with box cutters and manure (911 and Oklahoma bombing)
Crazies will find ways to take lives.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
2dimes wrote:You are kidding right?salr15 wrote:How about the video games that are being created today? how come no one blames those games (Grand Theft Auto being a great example) where killing civilians with shotguns and gernades is glamourized?
There's been people blaming those since the first generation ones where you couldn't really tell what was a person and what was a box.
Hyasri wrote:Dont panic, I am here and active
Just taking my time to get familiar with everything rather than just rushing in and making some rash decisions.
salr15 wrote:I don't think looking at the issue is as ridiculous as you make it out to be. I don't think it is entirely out of the question that a young kid sitting and playing violent games for hours and weeks and months would possibly become desensetized to violence.
I don't think you can compare commando for Nintendo to a game come Xbox360 or a PC. The games are becoming more and more realistic, detailed guns and even detailed graphics of killing someone.
Hyasri wrote:Dont panic, I am here and active
Just taking my time to get familiar with everything rather than just rushing in and making some rash decisions.
salr15 wrote:And you point is what? That the parents were wrong?
Hyasri wrote:Dont panic, I am here and active
Just taking my time to get familiar with everything rather than just rushing in and making some rash decisions.
salr15 wrote:That's what I was implying...parents don't have control over what their children are doing. I am not against the video games themselves, as I said I used to play Counterstrike and Hitman. It is more about the fact that these type of games get into the hands of the wrong kids specially young kids. Where are their parents to control what their kids do? It is more a statement about our culture. Usually these wacky kids come from families where the parents are never around, they feel alone and isolated. Obviously in this case the kid also must have some chemical inbalance as well.
Basically what I am saying is you can't just look at the gun law and blame that. There are alot more important factors.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
2dimes wrote:Could be often children are an inconvenient by product of going to the bar and scoring.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Looks good on paper but it would be miss handled like the "war on marijuana".Anarkistsdream wrote:2dimes wrote:Could be often children are an inconvenient by product of going to the bar and scoring.
And that is a whole different debate about sterilization, and being required to have a license to have a child...
2dimes wrote:Looks good on paper but it would be miss handled like the "war on marijuana".Anarkistsdream wrote:2dimes wrote:Could be often children are an inconvenient by product of going to the bar and scoring.
And that is a whole different debate about sterilization, and being required to have a license to have a child...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Guiscard wrote:In the UK, I could get hold of any drug you fancied within an hour of you asking me
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:They had their SN erased..
I own over 15 guns... I will continue to own them and shoot them...
I have a HUGE possibility of going to jail forever, because if you own a gun and do drugs, the punishment is VERY harsh... But I would not shoot someone juts becasue I was stoned... Matter of fact, that would STOP me!
Gnome de Guerre wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:They had their SN erased..
I own over 15 guns... I will continue to own them and shoot them...
I have a HUGE possibility of going to jail forever, because if you own a gun and do drugs, the punishment is VERY harsh... But I would not shoot someone juts becasue I was stoned... Matter of fact, that would STOP me!
Word up! It's nice to see other responsible gun owners (who enjoy a bit of herb). Now, cocaine and firearms -- there's a recipe for trouble.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
heavycola wrote:Whitehouse spokesman Dana Perino quoted in my newspaper today:
"the President believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed"
I am sure this is a great comfort to all. If only the gunman had thought about his responsibilites as a gun owner beforehand.
So one apparently love-crazed kid can murder 32 random students and kill himself before he is stopped. Could he have done this without his arsenal?
Are these seemingly oh-so-frequent and terrible massacres the price you pay in the US for your right to bear arms?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee