dazza2008 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:You guys are still doing it. Please stop. Don't conflate whether we should lynch Rodion or not with the question of who else is scummy enough to be lynched.
MoB, regarding your points.
@ 1) I assume you mean we need to choose sides between those three and lynch one or maybe even two of them? Well, allow me to disagree, Rodion has claimed. His death is only useful if he takes a scum with him. Chap has effectively softclaimed VT by offering to hammer Rodion immediately after he claimed, before offering to hammer was considered to be a pro-town stance. Strike has generally been constructive, there is no clear evidence, but I'm more inclined to say he's town than scum.
No, what we need to do is find consensus, not "choose sides". (Sorry chap, this is not a day we want to end quickly quite yet.)
@ 2) Exposing further powerroles would indeed not be a good thing, but neither is it a good thing to have someone who's likely a townie hammer Rodion.
@ 3) Of course his death would provide us with information, but we have to ask ourselves at what cost.
@ 4) Or the cop could simply investigate someone else.
So you are 100% sure he is what he says he is. How so sure?
I actually adressed this in my post before the one you quoted. Skimming some bits?
I've slept on it a bit, and I'm fairly convinced that Rodion is a bomb, probably even town. If he isn't, he overplayed his hand big time. It would have been easy to put him at L-1 and wait for chapcrap to hammer, the entire discussion would've died with Rodion.
So, no, I'm not 100% sure he says what he is, but if he is lying about it I think he took it way too far. Assuming that he is scum, any townie could have put him at L-1 for a variety of reasons after the votes started accumulating again. (Unless I missed something he's been at L-2 for the past few days.) Two people (one of them was you) had declared their willingness to hammer him immediately after his claim, the chances of him getting lynched quickly were fairly high.