Soundman's First Mafia [End] Arsonist Wins!!

by **Victor Sullivan** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:19 pm

thehippo8 wrote:ALTOGETHER NOW ... IN A LOUD VOICE

WHY DO YA BUILD ME UP, BUTTERCUP...!

Oh, sorry :oops:

-Sully

by **thehippo8** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 4:13 pm

hAVE THE WORKING BEE GETTING IT ALL PREPARED

by **MoB Deadly** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 5:14 pm

unvote vote sully I am too tempted

by **chapcrap** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:00 pm

Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

by **TeeGee** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:28 pm

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

by **thehippo8** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:32 pm

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!

by **TeeGee** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:34 pm

thehippo8 wrote:
The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!

I think he is scared of me

by **chapcrap** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:35 pm

TeeGee wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

by **TeeGee** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:40 pm

chapcrap wrote:
TeeGee wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

my bad, if anyone wants to know, I fixed a stuff up where I accidentally doubled up on the colour codes.

However as I broke a rule. I await my punishment

by **Rodion** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:46 pm

Chap, can you confirm he just edited something meaningless?

by **usAir** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:50 pm

I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

by **TeeGee** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:55 pm

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

by **Victor Sullivan** on Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:13 pm

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

That's because this forum is under TeeGee's department's 'jurisdiction', thus he has master editing powers that can't be seen unless he wants them to! I can do the same in the Conquer Club Newsletter and Announcements forums.

*waves his magical wand*

-Sully

by **chapcrap** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:13 am

TeeGee wrote:
usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

by **TheGeneral2112** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:18 am

I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

by **Mr. Squirrel** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:31 am

TheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressive :roll:

by **TheGeneral2112** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:24 am

Mr. Squirrel wrote:
TheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressive

Why are you accusing me of being aggressive? I didn't FOS him, didn't vote him, made a harmless comment. As a result you quote me, criticize me, and call me aggressive? FOS, Squirrel, FOS... :-k

by **usAir** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:03 am

I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

by **TheGeneral2112** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:30 am

usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

This was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:
TeeGee wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:
TeeGee wrote:
usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

by **chapcrap** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:09 pm

TheGeneral2112 wrote:
usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

This was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:
TeeGee wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:
TeeGee wrote:
usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

What 2112 said. All I did was point out a mistake and say it wasn't important.

by **Victor Sullivan** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:34 pm

unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

by **Mr. Squirrel** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:38 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?

by **Victor Sullivan** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Mr. Squirrel wrote:
Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?

I suppose it's only fair.

I feel like TheGeneral is using a scapegoat-type method to get TeeGee lynched. It was clearly a newb mistake and didn't have any malicious intent. I feel like TheGeneral is just using it as an excuse to get a townie lynched.

-Sully

by **isaiah40** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:08 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:I feel like TheGeneral is using a scapegoat-type method to get TeeGee lynched. It was clearly a newb mistake and didn't have any malicious intent. I feel like TheGeneral is just using it as an excuse to get a townie lynched.

-Sully

i would like to know how you know the TeeGee is a townie? I haven't read anything even remotely suggesting he's a townie. Unless you know something the rest of us don't :-s

Unless you're cryptically saying that you're mafia!? Or are you saying that TheGeneral is mafia? Please enlighten us Sully.

by **thehippo8** on Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:45 pm

usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

True that, and how quickly people get off track!

I can understand Victor questioning 2112, but frankly he just looks a little pressured and isn't so used to the effect his words have. Unlike you Victor, you know exactly what you are doing. That's what I call passive aggressive but it's aggressive all the same!

As to TeeGee making an edit, you are playing Johnny-come-lately Isaiah. I was there and saw the before and after. So, for the benefit of all, the first was ...

[color=#FF0000]unvote vote chapcrap

and the second ...

unvote vote chapcrap

Now, for those of you who are skimming, 2112 voted for chap. And chap (and I) saw the vote change. Chap mentioned it, and 2112 explained. Given chap had the greatest reason to pursue this and now chooses not to, unfortunately, I can find nothing useful here in this!!

But Chap said ...

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

So, again for the skimmers, I started some pressure on TeeGee because of his silence. Once he had spoken up I considered that I had no reason to pursue that pressure by way of a vote. I appreciate, Isaiah, that you are asking more of TeeGee and I agree we have little information to go on at this time, certainly not enough to clear TeeGee one way or the other!

There is now some fractionation of voting and discussion, which later I reckon will be telling as to who is on who's side and why! For now FOS Victor, either explain that you are skimming in your vote or you are the proverbial fly in the ointment!

Soundman's First Mafia [End] Arsonist Wins!!

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Re: Soundman's First Mafia [14/14] Day One

Who is online