m=0
Moderator: Community Team

 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		drunkmonkey wrote:EBWOP unvote vote blake
Tired of playing games. We'll find out soon enough who's lying.


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		BGtheBrain wrote:Christ Im voting in blue.



 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		BGtheBrain wrote:Ok, if Blake comes up as the doc, i feel Drake and Saf will need to pay for this.
Why Saf? Bc he was quick to believe it and convinced me to switch my vote.
unvote vote Blake Bowling
that is the hammer correct?


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		safariguy5 wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:Ok, if Blake comes up as the doc, i feel Drake and Saf will need to pay for this.
Why Saf? Bc he was quick to believe it and convinced me to switch my vote.
unvote vote Blake Bowling
that is the hammer correct?
What exactly do you want me to say? If blake is the doc, then obviously we lynch drake. Remember, I never cast a vote for blake until I heard the counterclaim. Go back and read my posts a couple nights ago when zimmah was pushing for a lynch. I said we should go investigate more leads first and talk it out.
Now we know either blake or drake are lying, and that's a lot better than just lynching blake and not really having any other possible leads.


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		BGtheBrain wrote:that damn blue!

 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		 blakebowling
				blakebowling
			















 
		
 spiesr
				spiesr
			











 
		spiesr wrote:So, here is what you guys wanted, the summation of the info I have collected.My point here I guess, is that it appears that the nights when I blocked pancakemix match up with the nights where the mafia roleblocker didn't block anybody. So, if Blakebowling doesn't come up as the mafia roleblocker, we should probably look into that or something...


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		

 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		

 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		

 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		

 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		pancakemix wrote:First off, Travis Bickle? Town vig? Hell no. Bickle is a psychopath, not a vigilante. If he is a vig, he's overeager at best, and that just makes him dangerous.


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		safariguy5 wrote:Don't forget that Mr. Squirrel claimed when BG shot him with the proton pack, Mr. S had a one-shot bulletproof vest. I'm not going to declare that he's the mafia godfather, but there seems to be circumstantial evidence that points towards that. Definitely a good lead for Day 6.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that

 Mr. Squirrel
				Mr. Squirrel
			




 
		Because in a scenario where the usual sources of fudging up an action like that have been eliminated, (We know that he was not roleblocked and that the busdriver did not effect that action.) you are basically forced to either confirm his action or deny his entire claim. Presumably you would have felt that his claim was too solidly accepted for denying to be a safe option at this point. So I would guess that you thought that collaborating his claimed action would win you more town points that any of the other options available to you.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I know this is a WIFOM argument, but why would I want to confirm BG's claim if I was scum?

 spiesr
				spiesr
			











 
		drunkmonkey wrote:I think spiesr's lead on pcm is more promising. I also made a note of this earlier, during the case on VS:pancakemix wrote:First off, Travis Bickle? Town vig? Hell no. Bickle is a psychopath, not a vigilante. If he is a vig, he's overeager at best, and that just makes him dangerous.
I actually watched Taxi Driver the other night (been meaning to for a while; this just further inspired me). Travis Bickle only kills 4-5 people in the movie. 1 was robbing a store at gunpoint, and the other 3-4 (can't remember) he killed trying to free a 12-year-old Jodie Foster from prostitution. He's absolutely a vigilante character. When I re-read this, it seemed like pcm was falsifying information about the character to speed up the case. I could be wrong, but I wanted to get it out there now that blake has been hammered and it won't detract from that case, and in case I die tonight.


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		blakebowling wrote:I don't understand what you want me to post. I've told you the truth about everything, either you believe me (or you know lynching a doc would be horrible for town), or you lynch me today. I'm more than willing to answer questions, but I am the doc. I just don't know how I can verify that today.


 zimmah
				zimmah
			



















 
		zimmah wrote:blakebowling wrote:I don't understand what you want me to post. I've told you the truth about everything, either you believe me (or you know lynching a doc would be horrible for town), or you lynch me today. I'm more than willing to answer questions, but I am the doc. I just don't know how I can verify that today.
a doc not taking half his night actions is not horrible?
 blakebowling
				blakebowling
			















 
		blakebowling wrote:zimmah wrote:blakebowling wrote:I don't understand what you want me to post. I've told you the truth about everything, either you believe me (or you know lynching a doc would be horrible for town), or you lynch me today. I'm more than willing to answer questions, but I am the doc. I just don't know how I can verify that today.
a doc not taking half his night actions is not horrible?
It was a lie, what did you expect?

 zimmah
				zimmah
			



















 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users