Moderator: Community Team
The simple fact that all of the strategy threads quickly fall of the page is evidence enough that a whole forum for it would be unused.
dolemite wrote:I just did a quick, unscientific check of that forum. Of the top ten posts, three were loosely related to strategy. Of those three, two were discussions that related more to game design and player courtesy, rather than actual strategy. The one pure strategy post out of the top ten had some great links posted by Lack, but it will quickly be lost to new posts. If there was a strategy forum- something like that would be stickied.
alex_white101 wrote:dolemite wrote:I just did a quick, unscientific check of that forum. Of the top ten posts, three were loosely related to strategy. Of those three, two were discussions that related more to game design and player courtesy, rather than actual strategy. The one pure strategy post out of the top ten had some great links posted by Lack, but it will quickly be lost to new posts. If there was a strategy forum- something like that would be stickied.
that one by lack is stickied so will never slip off the page. dont worry bout that onealso if strategy threads were that important as to have a whole forum i agree with hecter that it wudnt be needed as the threads are lost quickly.
AndyDufresne wrote:We are looking into sub-forums.
--Andy
hecter wrote:Look, if a thread falls off the page, then the people must have stopped caring about it, so they stopped posting. And if somebody did care about it a lot, then they would go and resurect it. Besides, maybe it'll be made into a sub-forum when lack gets around to all that sorta stuff.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users