Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- Gen.LeeGettinhed
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:32 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (just south of El USA -- that's Spanish for The USA)
Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
Accused:
Culs De Sac
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy - trying to
Game number(s):
9907601 - assumed
Comments:
hey, not looking for trouble, etc. but went to post on Fritsyyy wall and saw. . then saw general comment by Fritsyyy on Culs (just general comment):
you are dropping the most troops behind me.. i need to keep you at bay.. or you win.. i have no choice
by Culs De Sac
on Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:44 pm
worst stratergiser ever
by fritsyyy
on Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:42 pm
DIscussed briefly with Chat Mod, who recommended C&A entry. At first they said "might be grey area" -- I think it's clear SD.
screen shot attached on excel file. only way I know how.
Culs De Sac
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy - trying to
Game number(s):
9907601 - assumed
Comments:
hey, not looking for trouble, etc. but went to post on Fritsyyy wall and saw. . then saw general comment by Fritsyyy on Culs (just general comment):
you are dropping the most troops behind me.. i need to keep you at bay.. or you win.. i have no choice
by Culs De Sac
on Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:44 pm
worst stratergiser ever
by fritsyyy
on Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:42 pm
DIscussed briefly with Chat Mod, who recommended C&A entry. At first they said "might be grey area" -- I think it's clear SD.
screen shot attached on excel file. only way I know how.
- Culs De Sac
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:53 pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
Hmm.. So where do I begin.. First of.. You were not in the game, so you have no right to comment on any particular situation that may or may have not occurred in that game.
But to wrap this matter up quickly and not waste anyone's time. Let me just discuss what occurred..
The game is a current speed game.. Current at the time of this post at least, since it is not over. I have green for a target.. In round 7, red begins to miss the first of 3 consecutive turns which will obviously boot him from the game.. In Round 8, Green misses a turn and then misses another turn in Round 9. Hence, I assume that green is going to follow suit and deadbeat as well.. In order to win the game being nuclear and adj settings.. I need to maximize my bonus while negating my opponents..
So i begin to fight for regions in Gen Pop which happen to be occupied by both Cyan and Pink.. But guess what happens.. Cyan then decides he wants to dead beat and green returns to game stating that he was making dinner.. So with 2 missed turns and no extra regions taken, there are three players who have more than 20 regions.. Pink, Green, and Myself.. based on gameplay my assumption is that Pink has cyan and with cyan missing the first of three turns. I have no choice but to focus my troops and attacks on pink or he wins the game..
Thereafter, right before announcing that he is leaving the game.. pink walls me a msg stating that he feels im the worst strategist ever!. I respond in kind letting him know that i felt that he was the threat and I have no choice..
So explain this to me.. If it was secret diplomacy then why the F.Uck! did i attack pink several rounds in a row and he returned in kind.. If i were conducting secret diplomacy would the object be to WIN the game.. But pink declared he was going to dead beat because he had work later on and green eventually won the game..
so do me a favor Gen. Lee.. Get over yourself. stop fantasizing about me.. and stop wasting my time along with that of the mods who will have to look into this.
As for the mods, feel free to do your inquiry.. I have nothing to hide.
Thanks,
Culs
But to wrap this matter up quickly and not waste anyone's time. Let me just discuss what occurred..
The game is a current speed game.. Current at the time of this post at least, since it is not over. I have green for a target.. In round 7, red begins to miss the first of 3 consecutive turns which will obviously boot him from the game.. In Round 8, Green misses a turn and then misses another turn in Round 9. Hence, I assume that green is going to follow suit and deadbeat as well.. In order to win the game being nuclear and adj settings.. I need to maximize my bonus while negating my opponents..
So i begin to fight for regions in Gen Pop which happen to be occupied by both Cyan and Pink.. But guess what happens.. Cyan then decides he wants to dead beat and green returns to game stating that he was making dinner.. So with 2 missed turns and no extra regions taken, there are three players who have more than 20 regions.. Pink, Green, and Myself.. based on gameplay my assumption is that Pink has cyan and with cyan missing the first of three turns. I have no choice but to focus my troops and attacks on pink or he wins the game..
Thereafter, right before announcing that he is leaving the game.. pink walls me a msg stating that he feels im the worst strategist ever!. I respond in kind letting him know that i felt that he was the threat and I have no choice..
So explain this to me.. If it was secret diplomacy then why the F.Uck! did i attack pink several rounds in a row and he returned in kind.. If i were conducting secret diplomacy would the object be to WIN the game.. But pink declared he was going to dead beat because he had work later on and green eventually won the game..
so do me a favor Gen. Lee.. Get over yourself. stop fantasizing about me.. and stop wasting my time along with that of the mods who will have to look into this.
As for the mods, feel free to do your inquiry.. I have nothing to hide.
Thanks,
Culs

- dan the general
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:42 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
no problems in that game as far as i could see culs de sac was playing fine
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
ANY and ALL discussion with opponents are ONLY allowed in game chat. No exceptions.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
lolz i was there and i didnt see no cheating at all thre only poor sportsmanship on pink red and forgot what the other color was for deadbeating and besides he didnt even win lolz
- Culs De Sac
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:53 pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
jefjef wrote:ANY and ALL discussion with opponents are ONLY allowed in game chat. No exceptions.
There was no discussion.. Pink said i was a poor strategist.. and i defended myself.. had nothing to do with targets, bonuses, etc.. the comment were based on the fact that pink was unhappy with my gameplay and then he deadbeated.
What game information was posted on walls that was not clearly visible in game log?
Furthermore, I attempted to respond in game chat as well, but pink had already left!

Re: Culs De Sac - SD
its a no brainer tht all chat must be in the game but i didnt see any words saying tht hey lets be allies all i saw was keep u at bay which is understandable..... people always message me on my wall ex: saying hey calm down thre buddy dont kill urslef on me just yet we have another play...now tht is a secret deplomacy...( FYI relax i always tell them to post in in game chat)... but if its just a comment saying im keeping u in line then thts fine in my head atleast... thre was no hint of allience...
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
and if lets just he did cheat dont u think other would have noticed and gave him bad rating his rating is at 4.7 so i doubt he started having poor sportsmenship just like tht.... i believe pink is a sore loser and thts tht..
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
Awww GLG! Say it ain't so! Did this really warrant a C&A?
How much you want for Daze? (Culs De Sac on Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:33 pm)
She's priceless, Culs. ;-P (MudPuppy on Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:46 pm)

She's priceless, Culs. ;-P (MudPuppy on Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:46 pm)

Re: Culs De Sac - SD
A guys was banned just for saying on wall give me a card spot so...
- clapper011
- Posts: 7208
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
hmmm..I dont see how culs is Sd in this one... pink was ticked off at culs strategy... how would that be secret diplomacy?... But I am not a cheating and abuse mod.. This is just my opinion from what I read...
- trinicardinal
- Chatter

- Posts: 2911
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:59 am
- Location: On a Tropical Island - Coconut anyone?
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
clapper011 wrote:hmmm..I dont see how culs is Sd in this one... pink was ticked off at culs strategy... how would that be secret diplomacy?... But I am not a cheating and abuse mod.. This is just my opinion from what I read...
I also don't think its secret diplo. I think Culs was offering an explanation... But I'm not the expert... I'm definitely interested in the results of this one
10:16:35 ‹Ace Rimmer› haven't looked at work in ages
10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
benga wrote:A guys was banned just for saying on wall give me a card spot so...
asking for a card spot is a form of diplomacy. telling a player who said you have bad game play, that you are holding him back is not.
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
eddie2 wrote:benga wrote:A guys was banned just for saying on wall give me a card spot so...
asking for a card spot is a form of diplomacy. telling a player who said you have bad game play, that you are holding him back is not.
This is scary folks, I am quoting eddie2. I do not feel that this was secret diplomacy. Culs De Sac is CLEARED.

- MoB Deadly
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:07 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Culs De Sac - SD
Their chats did not effect eachothers' gameplay. They both were acting off their own strategies
fastposted - glad to see this clear
fastposted - glad to see this clear

Art by: [player]codierose[/player] | High Score: 2550
- Culs De Sac
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:53 pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
there was no secret diplomacy.. yellow was killing me breaking 50 percent of my bonus and yellow was my target... i was tired and grumpy as i was 2 in the morning... hence the reason i spat the dummy.
- Gen.LeeGettinhed
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:32 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (just south of El USA -- that's Spanish for The USA)
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
Can Eddie get some "store credits" for getting something right??? He'll prob need them again soon enough...lol
- trinicardinal
- Chatter

- Posts: 2911
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:59 am
- Location: On a Tropical Island - Coconut anyone?
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
DJPatrick wrote:Can Eddie get some "store credits" for getting something right??? He'll prob need them again soon enough...lol
lol... knowing eddie, he probably will.
fritsyyy wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
What's it to him? something that he considered might be against site rules and he therefore reported it... many other people do the same including myself. In this case the ruling is that it was not (which I agree with). Other people may have different opinions on this one, just as GLG did (maybe still does?).
10:16:35 ‹Ace Rimmer› haven't looked at work in ages
10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
10:42:43 ‹Sackett58› fine, I'll take my panties elsewhere
- TheForgivenOne
- Posts: 5998
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
fritsyyy wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
So if you see an obvious multi in a game you aren't in, you shouldn't report it?
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
TheForgivenOne wrote:fritsyyy wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
So if you see an obvious multi in a game you aren't in, you shouldn't report it?
it was no where near an obvious multi though? i cant see how we were SDing so it couldnt have been that obvious. Maybe next time he should keep his nose out of it cause now he just looks like a dick
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
fritsyyy wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:fritsyyy wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
So if you see an obvious multi in a game you aren't in, you shouldn't report it?
it was no where near an obvious multi though? i cant see how we were SDing so it couldnt have been that obvious. Maybe next time he should keep his nose out of it cause now he just looks like a dick
fritsyyy some people think sd is any form of communication via walls during games. this is due to the way previous cases have happened. lets say it was culs de sac that started this c and a thread for the reason of you were trying to start a secret diplomacy. he had every right to and general lee should of had your name on this thread not culs.
fact of the matter is this case was not classed as secret diplomacy because it was a assassin game if this was a regular game then it was sitting on the border line of being that.
- TheForgivenOne
- Posts: 5998
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Re: Culs De Sac - SD[CLEARED]ES
fritsyyy wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:fritsyyy wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) SD rules state: "...not limited to. . .if suspected.. . report it" -- so I did
2) sides are split: jefjef agreed: ALL game related chat should be in game chat
3) harrassing someone that simply reported a C&A (after asking a mod) should not be tolerated by CC
4) going int Social and telling reporter to "fuc k off. . " and ". . you coc k sucker" should not be tolerated by CC
I saw it, I reported it. don't kill the messenger.
whats it to you though?
So if you see an obvious multi in a game you aren't in, you shouldn't report it?
it was no where near an obvious multi though? i cant see how we were SDing so it couldnt have been that obvious. Maybe next time he should keep his nose out of it cause now he just looks like a dick
Reread what I wrote. Did I EVER say any of you were a multi? NO. I said "IF" you see an obvious multi.
