Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
I'm not completely sure if this is the right game, but it's the same as Texas Hold 'em, except you get 4 hand cards, but use two.The1exile wrote:What's Omaha Holdem? (Only ever played Texas, never heard of a different one)
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Anarchy Ninja wrote:seems most people here are in favour of the less chance related games
i like roulette, especially the russian variety.
i havent lost a game yet!
flashleg8 wrote:wiggybowler wrote:Come on someone has to have a question about some game.
Ever read the 70's book "beat the dealer" about counting cards in black jack. Is it still relevant to todays game?
wiggybowler wrote:flashleg8 wrote:wiggybowler wrote:Come on someone has to have a question about some game.
Ever read the 70's book "beat the dealer" about counting cards in black jack. Is it still relevant to todays game?
Yes I have read this book and yes it is still relevent to the game of blackjack. There are many different ways to count cards. Using basic strategy you can lower the house advantage to about 1%, but when you can skillfully count the cards you can actually take the houses edge and put it in your favor. I could post a common way if some of you would like.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
feiterman wrote:Since we are talking bout card counting, any of you guys ever hear of the MIT blackjack team?
wiggybowler wrote:Card Counting
10,Jack,Queen,King = -1
3,4,5,6 = +1
everything else= 0
1st off to do this it take alot of practice, you need to get to a point where you can keep adding the total of the cards while not slowing the game and maybe even keeping a conversation going.
2nd You need to keep a running total of all cards you see out of the shoe.
ex. Ace,5,8,4,3,Jack =+2
3rd a +count is in your favor and a -count is in the houses favor.
4th Take the running total and divide that number by the amount of decks left not dealt. This is the true count
ex. +6/2(decks remaining)= +3 true count
5th multiply the true count by the amount of money you are betting to start with.
ex. Min. table limit is $5( you bet this when you don't have a +true count), true count = +3 so you have $5*3=$15( this is what you should be betting with a true count of +3)
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
feiterman wrote:Since we are talking bout card counting, any of you guys ever hear of the MIT blackjack team?
Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun