pancakemix wrote:Let's see how people reacted at the first implication of cult
Safari: Suggested it. Was accused of being cult. It was argued that he would not suggest it if he were cult, but this is a WIFOM argument and ca get tricky.
safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.
TheSaxlad wrote:
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
I wouldn't say much more here, but
here's a case from commander on Day 3.
Victor Sullivan: Moot.
Metsfan: Kinda pushes safari. Didn't vote, but makes the reasonable point that recruiter was not specifically implied.
Metsfanmax wrote:Ok, but the text didn't say anything about there being a recruiter, it just implied the hint of some sort of third party. Yet you jumped to the conclusion of recruiter immediately.
Also attempted to make it seem as though this was a more popular opinion than it actually was.
Metsfanmax wrote:Vote shield
Most of us thought it was suspicious that safari jumped to cult recruiter so quickly, but there simply wasn't enough to go on to force a real bandwagon. If you would be willing to join in on such weak evidence, something is probably amiss.
Jeradoo: Brings the WIFOM element into the mix. Supports the probability of a recruiter.
jeraado wrote:Mets, my first thought was recruiting cult and saf is way more experienced than me. If there is a third party faction then either it would have to have a good few members probably at least 4, or recruit. My take on the scene flavour is that at the moment it isnt a great threat, but needs to be taken care of, which suggests it can grow. However I think the main point is that personally, I couldn't see saf raising it in that way, even as a clever ruse to seem innocent.
Jimfinn: Never directly stated his opinion, but suggested that the scene could imply that there was a recruiter.
jimfinn wrote:Cult inherently implies recruiter, Metsfan, and he was listing as one possibility, not the definitive answer. Perhaps he also has some PR whose Role PM specifies anti-cult or something. It's not that suspect in my book. Setup specualtion is only suspicious when it avoids real discussion.
As for the players who've played a lot on here, what's the going meta with regard to cop, doc, vig, etc? One of each per game, or are no cop games common? Things like that do actually help at least some, especially for those unfamiliar with this site's version of mafia but experienced elsewhere.
Squirrel: Replaced Day 2. Could only speak from a perspective where cult was confirmed.
Made some changes to the initial post. Nothing major, mostly just removing Victor's section for the sake of brevity.
Let's talk aout Commander. Not his alignment, that's been beaten to death as far as he himself is concerned. More important is the reaction to his statement of alignment change.
Safari: Doesn't question it, but by the nature of this post we can see that trusts it.
safariguy5 wrote:So I'm assuming both town and mafia had hunters as the nagerous role was a mafia hunter. Do you happen to know if the hunters only look for you to switch alignment or can they switch alignment of other people?
This question seems genuine, so we can eliminate him from being the town hunter.
Safari was nearly lynched on Day 3 for I'm not sure what. Doom made an interesting point about him on Day 4
DoomYoshi wrote:Let's say for a second that I am mafia. Safariguy5 is saying, by his vote on me, that he is more worried about the mafia, which are probably down to very few members, then the cult, which are now up to 4 members. After 4 days, I begin to wonder: how much more evidence do people need that he is a possible recruiter: vote safariguy5
Now all Doom really knew was that Safari wasn't mafia and was trying to throw attention towards someone else. Despite that, the point is actually pretty valid.
Mets: Not really a direct response here, but there is this pretty neutral one:
Metsfanmax wrote:Yes, Commander wants us to believe that before he was recruited, he was third party and thus his win condition was probably "survive until the end." After he was recruited to the town, his win condition is now "eliminate all threats to the town."
Now my vote is currently on Mets for taking the easy way out on cult's existence and here it looks like he's doing it again. Now I will grant him that in context this is an explanation to Bleed about Commander's situation, but it's the wording here that gets me. I often find that the devil is in the details as far as these things go, and the detail "wants us to believe" is what doesn't sit right with me. There are other ways to say this in a neutral manner, like "is saying". But "wants us to believe" speaks to a lack of trust and a more sinister motive. I can't say not trusting Commander is itself scummy, as I'm guilty of that. It also brings with it a sense of wanting to bring a lynch in that direction. If you're a cult leader, lynching someone everyone thinks is cult seems like a sound strategy.
This is something I found interesting. It comes after a long stretch of silence from Mets:
Metsfanmax wrote:Commander9 wrote:I said I might be unrecruitable - I never said I definitely was. As far as my powers go - I've already said enough times that if I reveal my powers, they will be undone and I shall not do that even if I'd be lynched. Can you elaborate on the very last part?
Convenient copout. Even a vanilla townie, if that is indeed what you'd become after revealing your power, is useful to us in that it means we can avoid a wasted lynch.
A cult recruiter would also want to eliminate the town's greatest asset when he realized a lynch wasn't going to happen.
Jimfinn: Believed that Commander was town straight off.
jimfinn wrote:I agree that Commander is likely now town, I also agree that Bleed_Green more likely made an innocent mistake or misinterpretation than a scummy attempt at a lynch
Right here I would like to note that jimfinn was Gilligan's choice for his fake investigation as innocent. He could've been trying to bait a test on our part or trying to confirm his cultmate as town, though the latter option is WIFOM.
Mr. Squirrel: Got into a particularly large debate with Commander. Too long to post here;
here's the start of it.Now Squirrel's claim of ljex has been a bit disputed, though he did provide a list of actions.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Fine. I was given three powers: one track, one investigation, and one protect. When I replaced, none of them had been used.
Night 2: tracked firth, got nothing (died, revealed mason)
Night 3: investigated rodion (and got copblocked)
Night 4: protected C9 (although with no more mafia, I didn't really anticipate his death)
I'd like to point out that these actions have no consequences to them. To be fair though, he pointed out that he had been blocked on Day 4. Therefore, I have no reason to doubt that he was in fact blocked and that he is not the cult recruiter on that basis.
Jeraado: This was the first post I found from him after a very long silence, which goes to show how quiet he's been.
jeraado wrote:I assumed yoshi was being sarcastic, but I'm not very good at reading that type of thing...
Before we lynch yoshi though, I think we should work our way through the naxus question. Investigator is a pretty common claim for an anti-town role. Personally I had completely missed how odd it was that he had picked gilligan as recruited. Now that it has been spelt out, it doesn't seem to fit the role that naxus has claimed. I'd like to hear an explanation from him.
I agree that we've got to lynch the remaining mafia before they can kill again, but I don't think it would hurt to talk more about this case before we do.
This post doesn't say much. I don't know why we'd stay on talking about the case though. We had two claimed scum...
That's pretty much everything. One last thing I'd like to point out: Commander stated that he though cult had more than 4. If he had been right, we'd have lost by now. If there was still any doubt about him, it should be gone by now.
I'm sticking with my vote where it is, mostly because of the reasons here and the fact that his post have been sparse. (@Rodion, I did say the recruiter would be active, but as Mets pointed out he's been reading along. That all that's really necessary for the recruiter to be informed.)
@ Mets: So why do you think Victor lied if you were so sure it wasn't a scumtell?