Moderator: Community Team
TheFissk wrote: the scum will try there hardest to get me removed. you can help them or not. your choice.
Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonning
Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
evilchaos wrote:nagerous wrote:Wow, spam much? Can we get back to the mafia? If you want to randomly talk pokemon you should do it in OT or something.
Very well. Sorry for breaking up your discussion of a separate game.
Vote freezie. I'm sure this vote won't pass (nor should it in Day 1), but I find it fishy that freezie claimed the one role that makes it impossible for us to figure him out for sure if he is in fact scum. Especially at the very beginning of Day 1, before any discussion about anything had begun. I would assume that he would know this act is suspicious, and this is definitely a WIFOM situation, but in the end I don't believe that a miller would announce themselves at the beginning of Day 1 when they aren't in immediate danger of being "found out."
Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonning
Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
Rodion wrote:Fissk, I think it's time for you to roleclaim.
TheFissk wrote:Rodion wrote:Fissk, I think it's time for you to roleclaim.
I'm Onix, a Lyncher. basically I'm looking for a Pokemon, once i've found him/her, i've got to try me hardest to get him lynched, i win if i make to the end and he doesn't
nagerous wrote:Alright mod, let's see a vote count - I know fissk is quite near being lynched now.
Streaker wrote:Just finished rereading, and I'm willing to let my vote slip here due to being new. I know the feeling. Still, at that time it was enough to warrant my vote.
Unvote
About fissk's claim. Sneaky sneaky I must say. I don't think that's how lynchers WC works. Fissk cleary states that, for him to win, he has to be alive at endgame and his target has to be dead.
A lyncher has to LYNCH his target, and WINS when that happens.
Any thoughts on this? FoS Fissk (vote count?)
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:At least Fissk didn't claim VT, as Yoshi said there were no VTs. So from that point of view Fissk is telling the truth.
However odd his role sounds, he may be lying or telling the turth, we can't say for sure. And pokemon aren't easily associated with any mafia roles. My pokemon doesn't seem to fit his role either, but it is what it is. Since we can't tell easily as to whether his pokemon would fit the role, I think we should wait and see if any one counterclaims him. (does yoshi give mafia fake claims?)
I find myself satisfied with Fissk's defense only because he's new. But beware, Fissk, next time your defense needs to be a step up. I'll let you go for now, but if someone legitamately counterclaims or you do something else scummy, I might vote you. Just be cautious, and post with your brain.
evilchaos wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:At least Fissk didn't claim VT, as Yoshi said there were no VTs. So from that point of view Fissk is telling the truth.
However odd his role sounds, he may be lying or telling the turth, we can't say for sure. And pokemon aren't easily associated with any mafia roles. My pokemon doesn't seem to fit his role either, but it is what it is. Since we can't tell easily as to whether his pokemon would fit the role, I think we should wait and see if any one counterclaims him. (does yoshi give mafia fake claims?)
I find myself satisfied with Fissk's defense only because he's new. But beware, Fissk, next time your defense needs to be a step up. I'll let you go for now, but if someone legitamately counterclaims or you do something else scummy, I might vote you. Just be cautious, and post with your brain.
Yoshi said in his first post that he would provide fake claims if anyone was unfamiliar with the setting. We can't really count on a counterclaim in this game.
kratos644 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonningArmy of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
Alright. I'm convinced that AOG and Fissk have characters that are somehow linked. Be it by lovers, best friends, masons, mafia, or maybe some other third party. This blind I must defend fissk attitude seems pretty proving of this. The question will certainly be which though. I guess we'll find out when fissk claims though. If fissk turns out to be scum I know who I'll be looking into on day 2 though. Actually if fissk is scum I guess a cop checking out AOG could be helpful. Unless we feel that there would be enough evidence not to waste the cop investigation on AOG and try one of the other suspicious parties like hank or jonty.
freezie wrote:a lyncher isnt exactly a pro-town role, though..
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users