Moderator: Community Team
Rodion wrote:Just to make sure: what's the likelihood of a 20-player game having 2 bus drivers?
They claimed same role, but different people.
Rodion wrote:Define big, please.
Rodion wrote:Also, did Haggis hammer? Shall we stop talking?
Saxlad's vote counts are pretty disorganized, so I don't know if that was vote #11 on Hank.
Rodion wrote:Well, I'm not going to defend Hank here because he's been considerably scummy.
However, I find it weird that the counterclaim was made by Pancakemix (check all his day 1 posts).
I've raised the possibility of Pancakemix being a jester because I think his erratic play is kinda taunting us into lynching him. If we somehow lynch Hank to realize he was telling the truth, should we lynch Pancakemix on D2? That would be too good to him if he really was the jester.
About the likelihood of the game having a jester, I have no idea, but I know this official mafia game will give medals to everyone on the winning side and CC team wants those medals to be rare. What better way of making it rare than giving it to only one person (thus creating a 3rd-party jester that can win alone, regardless of the existence of a possible "4th-party" cult).
Commander9 wrote:Rodion wrote:Well, I'm not going to defend Hank here because he's been considerably scummy.
However, I find it weird that the counterclaim was made by Pancakemix (check all his day 1 posts).
I've raised the possibility of Pancakemix being a jester because I think his erratic play is kinda taunting us into lynching him. If we somehow lynch Hank to realize he was telling the truth, should we lynch Pancakemix on D2? That would be too good to him if he really was the jester.
About the likelihood of the game having a jester, I have no idea, but I know this official mafia game will give medals to everyone on the winning side and CC team wants those medals to be rare. What better way of making it rare than giving it to only one person (thus creating a 3rd-party jester that can win alone, regardless of the existence of a possible "4th-party" cult).
Well, if Hank turns out to be town, our vigs kill PCM - I'm sorry to say, but I don't see any problems here.
jonty125 wrote:No point voting for cardinal, as he is going to defend himself anytime soon. Unvote Vote:Hank
For ignoring the roleclaim issue, wasting precious time, and for being hypocritical.
jonty125 wrote:jonty125 wrote:No point voting for cardinal, as he is going to defend himself anytime soon. Unvote Vote:Hank
For ignoring the roleclaim issue, wasting precious time, and for being hypocritical.
I voted for hank but it's not on the vote count.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Streaker wrote:I will not have guaranteed interweb access from here.
Vote hank
PLEASE HOLD OF HAMMERING IF POSSIBLE, FOR HIS CLAIM.
but make sure we get at least a lynch if we don't hear from him![]()
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
firth4eva wrote:I would prefer us to do it the other way around, lynch pcm shoot hank. Pcm seems lyncherish
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
safariguy5 wrote:How appropriate, the AU mod goes down first. Newcastle for me please.
TheSaxlad wrote:safariguy5 wrote:How appropriate, the AU mod goes down first. Newcastle for me please.
AU Mod?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users