Dukasaur wrote:Why not just start a game with everyone role claiming then? Why bother voting at all?
Because that would take all the fun out of the game.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:jonty125 wrote:I aren't bandwagonning this time,
poor spelling. Should be "I am not" or "I'm not". Proper uses for "aren't": "You aren't", "they aren't", "We aren't" - Yes!
"he aren't",
"I aren't" - No!
careless typing may seem scummy, but the main thing is that it's not a common mistake. Just be careful when you type

With everything going on this is what you decide to comment on?
firth4eva wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:On another note King Achilles has gone missing, nobody knows of his whereabouts, but as the support admin, were going to need him to defeat Andy and the rest of TeamCC.
We need also to pay attention to this. Anyone have any idea what this means?(unless of course revealing it would be anti-town).
I'd say pancakemix is not jester, merely messing around on day 1.
I'm assuming that this means that "Swedish Chef" or "Saxlad" have an ability to perhaps look for him and if they'd find him, something would happen. This is my assumption anyways.
Metsfanmax wrote:May I remind you that this is the entire content of the "fairly lengthy" post?
safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.
...
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
So yeah, I'm pretty sure he did immediately jump to cult recruiter, as in fact this was his first post in the thread.
jonty125 wrote:FOS safari based on these last two posts.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I agree with jonty. Vote Safariguy
jonty125 wrote:unvote vote: safariguy5 not for the 1st time.
And here are you 3 again. Voting without any good reasons, blatantly bandwaggoning and not making much sense.
Army of GOD wrote:It's getting difficult for me to tell the difference between scummy and n00by plays in this game.
I mean yea, if we were all experienced players then what shield and hank did were absolutely fucking stupid, but I think they just don't know what they're doing and I see innocence in them.
I feel like I see some alliances or whatever. Like Egg_McMuffin mentioned before, shield and jonty are probably together (but I don't necessarily think they're scum, just n000bs).
But also some of the defenses of safari seem a bit of overkill. Don't know if they're scum, 3rd party or town alliances though (derp! obviously).
With that sort of behaviour???
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I had already voted for safariguy because I thought he was suspicious. That was before jonty voted for him. In fact, my most recent vote for safari was a reiteration of my previous vote. I am not in any alliance with jonty.
safariguy5 wrote:I'm going to unvote, vote shieldgenerator for bandwagoning and Fos jonty for doing the same.
If you look back in the logs, I voted for you before jonty did, and thus was not bandwagoning.
safariguy5 wrote:Maybe, since I'm not the cult recruiter, I'd point it out because it's too obvious if I was. But then, if I was the cult recruiter, maybe I'd point it out so you all don't think I am the cult recruiter.
That's a possibility that I'm still considering.
What about actually having a good justification for it?
jonty125 wrote:unvote vote:jrh_cardinal for submarining.
Well... wouldn't it be better to prod/replace a person who's not interested in this game rather than lynch him? It would be really easy to lynch a person who can't defend himself, wouldn't it?
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I did too defend myself. I explained why it was I thought safariguy5 was suspicious. It may not be much to go on, but any argument anyone makes D1 is likely to not be based much on solid evidence. Luckily for safariguy he had evidence (or excuses?) to support his non-scum claim. That's all I'm saying. I'm suspicious of safariguy, even if the logic behind it is fuzzy. He may be a pro player of mafia, but sometimes he slips up too.
I agree, we should prod those inactives.
But you at least try to make a case on logic rather than fluff?
Streaker wrote:jonty125 wrote:I think streaker might be a Village Jester with all the zinging going on.
So because I write ZING! all the time, I'm a
Village Jester? Care to elaborate?
Maybe you should read up on what a Jester actually is, before going into flavour. ZING!
QFT.
firth4eva wrote:Streaker wrote: Hank, firth, same goes to you about my post against you 2. Anything to say about it?
I defended Hank because I believe him to be town... stop getting annoyed because I told you to unvote.
unvote vote shield
I would LOVE to hear the justification as well!
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I think it's strange how Commander9 posted he was going to post something, but it's already around 11pm and he hasn't posted anything yet. Scummarining? Also, where are all those other people who haven't been posting in a while? Maybe we should prod / lynch them. If they're not going to be active in this game, then how are they going to help the town win? They can't.
WTF? Now you're trying to direct attention from yourself with such a BS reason like this? I'm sorry that I actually have something to do
And lynch instead of replacing? Really?..
firth4eva wrote:jimfinn wrote:Yeah I'm not too concerned about the Zing! thing. It's mildly entertainig, mildly annoying.
Firth makes me a bit suspicious by responding to streaker and then voting shield without commenting on the vote. seems like an odd choice, but my vote is staying put. Hank seems more suspicious, new evidence had little to no impact on him.
firth4eva wrote:fos jonty fos shield, vote staying on yoshi though but if we're still at a point of no lynch at the deadline I would not mind lynching either of these
pancakemix wrote:Justify this.
Unvote
Vote Firth
firth4eva wrote: It's day one, and hank looks more like he's joking around than trying to waste time in order to benefit the mafia. This doesnt warrant a vote though.
Somewhat disagree - just because he's making nooby mistakes and is joking around doesn't mean his pro-town either. He's been one of the scummiest of the day and he'd be a good lead - and if he'd turn to be mafia...
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Hmm, I'm not feeling the case on hank here.
He accused other players of not being serious and then wasn't serious himself. Seems more nooby than anything to me. Shield seems a better choice.
Still, link with firth + him posting without contributing anything makes him a decent D1 lynch I guess.
Hank, you're at L-2, now is the time to show if you can contribute or not.
P.S. In case I die in the meantime or something: If shield/jonty is eventually revealed as scum, town should look carefully at how the wagons evolved today
To be fair, the case on hank is weak, but there aren't much better ones. I'd personally would prefer to go against shield, but Hank seems like a viable option.
DoomYoshi wrote:Now that's what I call a freakout. vote firth
Please explain how Firth freaked out?
pancakemix wrote:
LOL. U mad? U think I mad?
Also, that still doesn't explain why you think he's town.
Y U NO LEAVE HIS BAD LOGIC ALONE?
safariguy5 wrote:This is all well and interesting, but we need to choose a target. On the one hand, we seem to be on Hank because he's been minimally active in terms of evidence and bandwagonning without really contributing.
Then on the other hand, we're jumping on firth for defending Hank. The argument of mafia members not defending each other day 1 is wifom. You cannot use that to justify defending him. The easiest thing to do is to pressure a claim out of someone. Then decide whether the other person is scummy by association.
Personally, I think shield is the best option - incredibly scummy, can't handle the pressure and has not contributed anything at all.
Gilligan wrote:Holy crap stuff happens fast here...
Would love to hear a bit more than this
pancakemix wrote:Unvote Vote Hank
jeraado wrote:Interesting that pcm decided to jump straight in to hammer without waiting for a claim though. Care to explain?
pancakemix wrote:Not really.
What jeraado said - PCM, please do explain a bit more.
pancakemix wrote:firth4eva wrote:pancakemix wrote:Not really.
Not really interesting or you don't care to explain?
Both.
....
Hank44Soccer wrote:Vote Pancakemix
Reason you need to have a reason when promted with the question what isthis the seconed time this has occured?
You may want to start actually reading the thread - and this post doesn't make you look any better.
To summarize (top suspects):
1) Shield - has contributed pretty much nothing but fluff the whole day.
2) Hank - scummy through-out and his last post doesn't help.
3) PCM - had nothing on him recently, but his last few posts... worry me.
Unvote. Vote Shield.