Rowney, warmonger1981, eddie2 [busted, warned ++]

[Royal Panda]

Accused:

Rowney
warmonger1981
eddie2



The accused are suspected of:

Other: Points Dumping / Taking advantage of said Points Dumping



Game number(s):

Game 6213483
Game 6213751


Comments:

Rowney is points dumping, that much is obvious - but also, warmonger1981 has since played 9 games with Rowney after the chat:

2010-01-03 16:11:22 - warmonger1981: gl
2010-01-03 16:14:15 - Rowney: iam quitting 'CC' for good , the points are yours , sorry but i want players to get my points
2010-01-03 16:16:57 - warmonger1981: why you quitting???
2010-01-03 16:18:25 - warmonger1981: if this is the case i have all day to do so.
2010-01-03 16:18:42 - Rowney: sick of a load of stuff, heck out the forum piece i wrote on suggs and buggs,. lol
2010-01-03 16:21:31 - warmonger1981: well i cant win a fereaking roll against your singles
2010-01-03 16:23:05 - warmonger1981: gg you win
2010-01-03 16:23:20 - Rowney: i cant believe it, iam just pressing attack
2010-01-03 16:24:07 - warmonger1981: try attacking neutrals i would like that


eddie2 was also informed in his first game:

2010-01-03 17:07:38 - Rowney: iam quitting 'CC' for good , the points are yours , sorry but i want players to get my points
2010-01-03 17:12:58 - eddie2: hi can u set a few up then why u quiting

and proceeded to join another 5.

[jleonnn]

Accused:

Rowney




The accused are suspected of:

Point Dumping



Game number(s):

Game 6217369
Game 6217277
Game 6217276
Game 6217263
Game 6217259
Game 6215158
Game 6215156
Game 6215152
Game 6215151
Game 6215149
Game 6214954
Game 6214953
Game 6214952
Game 6214950
Game 6214948
Game 6214931
Game 6214927
Game 6214920
Game 6214917
Game 6214794
Game 6214791
Game 6214790
Game 6214742
Game 6214741
Game 6214700
Game 6214694
Game 6214655
Game 6214654
Game 6214653
Game 6214652
Game 6214563
Game 6214561
Game 6214558
Game 6214556
Game 6214514
Game 6214511
Game 6214510
Game 6214508
Game 6214493
Game 6214491
Game 6214489
Game 6213972
Game 6213971
Game 6213970
Game 6213968
Game 6213881
Game 6213878
Game 6213873
Game 6213871
Game 6213869
Game 6213867
Game 6213866
Game 6213757
Game 6213756
Game 6213754
Game 6213752
Game 6213751
Game 6213651
Game 6213649
Game 6213646
Game 6213645
Game 6213644
Game 6213642
Game 6213531
Game 6213530
Game 6213529
Game 6213528
Game 6213526
Game 6213523
Game 6213520
Game 6213483
Game 6213480
Game 6213221
Game 6213132
Game 6213085
Game 6213084
Game 6213082
Game 6212720
Game 6212719
Game 6212718
Game 6212716
Game 6212714
Game 6212711
Game 6212710
Game 6212661
Game 6212659



Comments:
He was major yesterday and cook, at 515 today. Not proof enough for ya? This is what he wrote on my wall:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hey , friend , nice of you to notice. I decided a couple of days ago to quit 'CC' and yesterday was my big point give away, i lost 148 games in a row and made a few newbies very happy. Its a time for me to concentrate on work now and as much as i will miss you guys and the game , i gotta make the break. good luck to you and much respect. lol

-J

[Agent 86]

Oh dear, why not leave gracefully...

[jleonnn]

I asked him why he couldn't just stay at major and leave.

[eddie2]

only joined game to get points as people with higher ranks are foeing low ranks so we find hard to get games i have an example of this on my wall if u want to look

[colton24]

only joined game to get points as people with higher ranks are foeing low ranks so we find hard to get games i have an example of this on my wall if u want to look

You ain't getting the point. You can't benefit from point dumping and you are doing that.

[eddie2]

so are the higher ranks who foe people so they dont lose points and stop lower ranks getting games cheating as well as they will only take u of foe list if u get a higher rank but are stopping u from doing it by foeing u and i only took enough points to get to a point where i would get unfoed from these players so i can play.

[colton24]

so are the higher ranks who foe people so they dont lose points and stop lower ranks getting games cheating as well as they will only take u of foe list if u get a higher rank but are stopping u from doing it by foeing u and i only took enough points to get to a point where i would get unfoed from these players so i can play.

No you can foe whoever you want, you can't benefit from point dumping

[eddie2]

ok so understand that now wont happen in future just need to see what happens hope dont get kicked out for it

[Mr Changsha]

so are the higher ranks who foe people so they dont lose points and stop lower ranks getting games cheating as well as they will only take u of foe list if u get a higher rank but are stopping u from doing it by foeing u and i only took enough points to get to a point where i would get unfoed from these players so i can play.

I like this excuse..I especially like it because it has the ring of truth about it; a sense that he actually justified the action at the time in this way.

However, it is balls to say high rankers are foeing low rankers in general. Assuming you consider a captain to be a high rank, then you are looking at about, what, 2,000 players you can play against. Are you seriously suggesting all these 2,000 players are foeing low rankers or, more specifically, an incredible number of 1,800 + players have foed you?

I think not.

I'm afraid you'll have to take your punishment like a man on this: six of the best, no supper before bed and an automatic point reset. Yes that's right...back to 1,000, a sore arse and an empty stomach. There can be no other way.

[Electricksabers]

so are the higher ranks who foe people so they dont lose points and stop lower ranks getting games cheating as well as they will only take u of foe list if u get a higher rank but are stopping u from doing it by foeing u and i only took enough points to get to a point where i would get unfoed from these players so i can play.

Maybe you get foed for other reasons

Game 6027251

That's why I foed you.

[lord voldemort]

Rowney has been website banned.
The other 2 are pending for now

[lord voldemort]

The other 2 have been warned and or given website vacations as required by the escalating ban structure. As well as several others cashing in on this.

lv

[lord voldemort]

Merged with other thread

[Pirlo]

hey.. why can't a cool guy like ArmySpeeder be forgiven by this site? all he wanted is to start a new & clean chapter.

[40kguy]

hey.. why can't a cool guy like ArmySpeeder be forgiven by this site? all he wanted is to start a new & clean chapter.

I wish he could come back to.

[Royal Panda]

hey.. why can't a cool guy like ArmySpeeder be forgiven by this site? all he wanted is to start a new & clean chapter.

What's this got to do with the dinosaur of a thread you've bought up?

[Pirlo]

hey.. why can't a cool guy like ArmySpeeder be forgiven by this site? all he wanted is to start a new & clean chapter.

What's this got to do with the dinosaur of a thread you've bought up?

I though point dumpers would get permabanned, but I see that Rowney himself is still active, while other people got permabanned?

[TheForgivenOne]

hey.. why can't a cool guy like ArmySpeeder be forgiven by this site? all he wanted is to start a new & clean chapter.

What's this got to do with the dinosaur of a thread you've bought up?

I though point dumpers would get permabanned, but I see that Rowney himself is still active, while other people got permabanned?

Maybe Brann2006/ArmySpeeder didn't wait long enough? Rowney came back after what looks like 8 months, so maybe it was a 6 month ban. But Brann broke the #1 rule of CC. No Multi's. Maybe he should have sent an e-ticket in, instead of creating a multi?

[General Brock II]

What I don't get is this... Rowney's a player in the 1st, and he's consistently remained Lieutenant throughout his membership. How long ago was it that he was accused of point dumping? I seriously don't believe it of him. I've never actually seen him as a major, either... Just Lieutenant.

[Pirlo]

the thread was started in Jan 2010

[eddie2]

the thread was started in Jan 2010

yep that was it in jan i was on site 4 months and this case introduced me to the forums.