The tone of your post calmed me down, so I appreciate that. I think there have been some things that frustrated me and edoc summed it up pretty well in all of his post- but I will quote the following one.
edocsil wrote:Vio isn't the doc, and if she was the cop she would have claimed so. Also because we know there is a doc the odds of anyone, much less her, being a cop are a slim 1 in 5 I knew what her claimed role was going to be so I said it. It annoyed her so she decided to screw around and claim RB. I really can't say I blame her. The fact that fir (and you) went off so strongly on her was super scummy imo.
Everything in that post as well as his others is QFT, and he reads me well. But also I will mention other things that I was also frustrated with .
I was also a little surprised with how scummy people thought I was for hammering Nag.
It has been brought up a few times by a few different people that it made no sense for me to give a post about how i thought Fir was scummy and keeping my vote on him, then out of nowhere, hammering Nag at the very end of my post.
To me it can be more scummy to keep the conversation divided. I was the lone person bringing up Fir; everyone else was more concerned with edoc and nag. Even if i had inner feelings about Fir's scuminess, I would only be prolonging things and causing a possible distraction by keeping my vote on Fir. Nag was L-1 at the time, Edoc was L-3, and the deadline was close.
From some observations in recent games, one mafia mistake can be to not vote a scummate who is close to being lynched- and instead try to divert attention to someone else, to look as though you are helping the town.
I felt i was basically in a situation where darned if i do and darned if i don't. If i stayed on Fir over nag, that would have looked scummy. So I took the risk and hammered Nag. I knew i might receive some comments for it, but not that much heat. This might be considered WIFOM, but I don't think that the mafia - in a game this small- would hammer someone they knew was a townie. That is just asking to be investigated and or voted. Most likely they would be the ones with the earlier votes, imo. Then wait and let the bandwagon grow larger and larger.
Also I felt frustrated with myself for never knowing when the deadline was. My eyes aren't playing tricks on me. The deadline said it was Saturday night or Sunday Morning and then i look at the thread today and in the title is says Deadline Monday, and that wasn't there before. The mod must have just put that or changed the deadline, but I can't always be wrong about it. Same thing day 1. The deadline was in a few hours and I hammer Nag, and everyone says, no we still had over 24 hours until the deadline.