m=0
Moderator: Community Team

 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

 edocsil
				edocsil
			



 
		
 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		
 aage
				aage
			


 
		edocsil wrote:No you don't. I just played Classic game with him today, and he was new here. His mafia setup sounds quite interesting however.
CK, I would suggest playing a game here before hosting one, otherwise people might not show up to play this one.

 Victor Sullivan
				Victor Sullivan
			

















 
			
 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		 /
				/
			




 
		pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that

 Mr. Squirrel
				Mr. Squirrel
			




 
		Campin_Killer wrote:I'd rather run it because the mechanics are a bit weird and I ran it on mafiascum

 Victor Sullivan
				Victor Sullivan
			

















 
			
 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		 /
				/
			




 
		


 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		aage wrote:The setup itself isn't bad. I have a question though. You're talking about xx% chance... will you be throwing 20-sided dices to determine that, or will e.g. 5% of all communications (no more no less) get into the hands of the eavesdropper? This is a crucial difference...



 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		
 theherkman
				theherkman
			














 
		


 Campin_Killer
				Campin_Killer
			



 
		Campin_Killer wrote:aage wrote:The setup itself isn't bad. I have a question though. You're talking about xx% chance... will you be throwing 20-sided dices to determine that, or will e.g. 5% of all communications (no more no less) get into the hands of the eavesdropper? This is a crucial difference...
I intend to be as random as possible about it. I won't be throwing dice, I will use random.org
 
   
   
 
 Streaker
				Streaker
			



















 
		Streaker wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:aage wrote:The setup itself isn't bad. I have a question though. You're talking about xx% chance... will you be throwing 20-sided dices to determine that, or will e.g. 5% of all communications (no more no less) get into the hands of the eavesdropper? This is a crucial difference...
I intend to be as random as possible about it. I won't be throwing dice, I will use random.org



You should consider rolling them 20-sided dice yourself

 Haggis_McMutton
				Haggis_McMutton
			











 
		Haggis_McMutton wrote:Streaker wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:aage wrote:The setup itself isn't bad. I have a question though. You're talking about xx% chance... will you be throwing 20-sided dices to determine that, or will e.g. 5% of all communications (no more no less) get into the hands of the eavesdropper? This is a crucial difference...
I intend to be as random as possible about it. I won't be throwing dice, I will use random.org



You should consider rolling them 20-sided dice yourself
Yeah, everyone knows that random.org is a conspiracy funded by the lizardmen ... DUH
 Streaker
				Streaker
			



















 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users