Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 [MAFIA WINS!]

by **VioIet** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:30 am

Unvote. Vote.

by **aage** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:43 am

VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

by **jeraado** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:10 am

Ok I had a read through from beginning to end and made a post count. It might not be 100% but:

Name Total posts
1. VioIet 16
2. sensfan 10
3. edoc'sil 25
4. kernov 33
5. TA1LGUNN3R 11
6. Drabod 16
7. TheSaxlad 15
8. ZeroZeroiCon safariguy5 13
9. Flow 21
10. Commander9 aage 16
11. jeraado 16
12. Haggis_McMutton 14

When I tracked the posts over time I noticed that although pretty much everyone has had at least one quiet period, sensfan has had several. Reading back, it is quite telling just how scummy kernov seemed, can't wait to see what happens when we get a chance to see whether his claim stacks up.

However, the person who I believe has contributed the least is Drabod. Very little actual on-topic conversation and the 'leads' Drabod has followed are pretty weak.

vote drabod

by **Drabod** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:21 am

There are people who have contributed less than me? but yet your now accusing me of having little on-topic conversation wheres the evidence?

I think all of my convo has been on topic and your just finding someone to pick on!

by **kernov** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:28 am

I think by on topic he means actual evidence material brought up from ppls posts.

by **jeraado** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:28 am

honestly, its a much lighter vote than i'd like (since we don't have too many leads), but I think you've contributed the least

by **Drabod** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:44 am

But by contributing least your saying that i should be lynched, - Well a candidate to be lynched seeing as your voting for me. Surely, this can prove my innocence, if i was mafia i would be contributing more on topic and pushing for the night time kill.

by **VioIet** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:25 pm

aage wrote:
VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

Errrr.. Well..... ummmm... I forgot :oops:

by **kernov** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:36 pm

hmmm more vagueness from violet.

by **Haggis_McMutton** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:51 pm

VioIet wrote:
aage wrote:
VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

Errrr.. Well..... ummmm... I forgot

Why are you trying to get lynched?

by **Flow520** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:58 pm

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
VioIet wrote:
aage wrote:
VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

Errrr.. Well..... ummmm... I forgot

Why are you trying to get lynched?

Perhaps itching to be forced to roleclaim? :lol:

by **edocsil** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:06 pm

Flow520 wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
VioIet wrote:
aage wrote:
VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

Errrr.. Well..... ummmm... I forgot

Why are you trying to get lynched?
Perhaps itching to be forced to roleclaim?

No kidding. That really is what it seams like.

by **kernov** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:55 pm

kernov wrote:A pretty hefty claim of some sort by Violet, i also need more info.

Im sure scum would not be as upfront with such a claim, but this could be a bluff.

A BIG fos for violet if i dont get more it will be a vote.

I still havent had any sort of reply on this yet.

So a BIG Fos for violet

For some reason im still loath to change my vote to Violet as im sure im missing something.

by **TA1LGUNN3R** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:42 pm

aage wrote:
VioIet wrote:Unvote. Vote.

Vote whom exactly?

Ha I know. I lol'ed. Silly violet.

vio wrote:Errrr.. Well..... ummmm... I forgot

Did you really? Or are you trying to create some confusion?

-Tails

by **aage** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:33 pm

Reading back I note violet announced doing something "bigger" to reanimate the thread, though i don't think it was necessary...

by **Drabod** on Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:18 pm

I think it has already been agreed violets joking, and winding people up. Not very suspicious in my eyes

by **safariguy5** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:44 am

Gah, I forgot I replaced someone in this game. It's still day 1 and 20 pages in...we haven't decided a lynch yet??!!

by **edocsil** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:02 am

safariguy5 wrote:Gah, I forgot I replaced someone in this game. It's still day 1 and 20 pages in...we haven't decided a lynch yet??!!

No there, have been distractions.... Violet currently

by **Flow520** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:02 am

safariguy5 wrote:Gah, I forgot I replaced someone in this game. It's still day 1 and 20 pages in...we haven't decided a lynch yet??!!

Are you volunteering for the noose? :shock:

by **jeraado** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:19 am

and just to clarify, suspicion is currently on violet because of the 'something bigger' comment and the odd comments of the last 2 pages right? I took those to be joking myself, but if there's something I'm missing please let me know

by **Haggis_McMutton** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:19 am

jeraado wrote:and just to clarify, suspicion is currently on violet because of the 'something bigger' comment and the odd comments of the last 2 pages right? I took those to be joking myself, but if there's something I'm missing please let me know

She's not "joking" like this in any of her other games. And she knows (from personal experience :p) that on D1 you can be easily lynched for minor suspicious comments.
Also, in other games she's making big analyses and stuff, here she just posts this inane nonsense.
The options that i see are:
1. She's decided for some reason not to take this particular game seriously.
2. She has some kind of very weird post restriction or something like that
3. She wants to be lynched.

I'm starting to lean towards 3. The fact that she's not responding adds to my suspicions.

If I'm wrong please clarify what the hell you're doing Violet.

by **aage** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:32 am

Haggis_McMutton wrote:The options that i see are:
1. She's decided for some reason not to take this particular game seriously.
2. She has some kind of very weird post restriction or something like that
3. She wants to be lynched.

I'm starting to lean towards 3. The fact that she's not responding adds to my suspicions.

Negative. She started behaving this way only 3 or so pages ago. If she wanted to be lynched, she would've started acting odd right away. Afaics she has been rather serious through the rest of the game.

by **jeraado** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:49 am

I suppose the only thing is that we haven't got many other leads. C'mon violet, do your 'something bigger' or say something scummy - we need some action

by **kernov** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:51 am

I agree with aage about the change of violets behaviour but i dont know why or even who she is protecting. Could she be a cupid role and is bulletproof as long as her lovers are alive? If she is she wont object to some votes.

So im upgrading my FoS to Unvote, Vote Violet to find out more, for now.

by **Haggis_McMutton** on Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:04 am

aage wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:The options that i see are:
1. She's decided for some reason not to take this particular game seriously.
2. She has some kind of very weird post restriction or something like that
3. She wants to be lynched.

I'm starting to lean towards 3. The fact that she's not responding adds to my suspicions.

Negative. She started behaving this way only 3 or so pages ago. If she wanted to be lynched, she would've started acting odd right away. Afaics she has been rather serious through the rest of the game.

So why do you think she's acting like this?
For the lulz? Doesn't seem like her to do that imo.

Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 [MAFIA WINS!]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Re: Sully's No Vanilla Mafia #1 - [Day 1]

Who is online