Are You a Werewolf? [a Mafia game] ~TOWN VICTORY!~

by **Hitman079** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:45 pm

Town Vote Count
[3] Machiavelli (vgmmaster, pyro55, Puff)

by **Aimless** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:00 pm

Hitman079 wrote:Town Vote Count
[3] Machiavelli (vgmmaster, pyro55, Puff)

Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?

by **Hitman079** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:01 pm

Aimless wrote:Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?

someone tell me what a bandwagon is.
<mafia noob

by **Syzygy** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:07 pm

everywhere116 wrote:Now that I think about is, syzygy, you seem to be as big of a submarine as mach. You started to post at about page 6(?) and then average about one post a page. Until page 13, where you post that it takes 7 to lynch. Fast forward to now, page 22, and this is your first post sincer page 13. I think you are trying to fly under the radar with mach, so that you can stay out of discussion to try not to be caufght.

FOS Syzygy

Fair enough point. I am fairly new to mafia games.

I haven't said much because the problem with pointing fingers at people is that you get fingers pointed back at you.

Doesn't change my slight suspicion of you though.

by **s.xkitten** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:49 pm

Hitman079 wrote:
Aimless wrote:Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?

someone tell me what a bandwagon is.
<mafia noob

band wagon is when a bunch of people jump on a vote when one person votes and makes a "point" that may or may not be true...common mafia tactic...

and i'm quiet again... :wink:

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:49 pm

Aimless wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:Town Vote Count
[3] Machiavelli (vgmmaster, pyro55, Puff)

Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?

Yes, as a matter of fact, it has started awfully fast, and Mach hasn't even had a chance to log on and say anything... 3 votes when it takes 8 to lynch looks like the bginning of a bandwagon... Especially when it is 3 people that are all very suspicious anyway!

by **Hitman079** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:54 pm

Happy St. Patrick's Day!!

by **s.xkitten** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:56 pm

lol...you're supposed to be a mod hitman...not egging the people on...geeze

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:00 pm

Hitman079 wrote:let's just hurry up and lynch Mach's ass before i have to wade through tens of pages of flip-flopping voters.

No shit... Did you just give something away as the Mod???

I hope not...

And, just because of this comment made BY THE MOD... I will not vote for him.

by **Hitman079** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:03 pm

changed my post :roll:

by **Fircoal** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:05 pm

that doesn't make it right, I find the Mach bandwagon suspicious.

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:16 pm

Fircoal wrote:that doesn't make it right, I find the Mach bandwagon suspicious.

As do I... However, I unfortunately still find you suspicious, as well...

Along with Balsiefen and VGMMaster

by **what,me worry?** on Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:36 pm

Can it be a drunk band wagon? Todays the only day out fo the year Im Irish, and by Irish,....I mean drunk

by **pyro55** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:34 am

what,me worry? wrote:Can it be a drunk band wagon? Todays the only day out fo the year Im Irish, and by Irish,....I mean drunk

i feel ya bro i feel the same way

by **vgmmaster** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:47 am

Mach just appears to be the most suspicious to me. And him trying to hide under the radar doesn't help his case.

Now, his first post on page 8 where he mentions that he forgot about the game, yes, that sounds reasonable. Now, perhaps he forgot again. i don't really know.

Concerning the bandwagon, I don't know why Pyro or Puff jumped (espiecally Pyro), but I mainly voted just to at least get him talking again.

However, I'm beginning to rethink something here.

I highly doubt Mach or Fircoal would kill a newbie. Now, perhaps they would kill a newb or two so we don't suspect the more experienced players as mafia, but you'd think that if Mach or Fircoal were mafia they'd kill somebody experienced. Unless they are both in the same mafia.

Also, there is still Autoload's theory to consider as well. Minkish has a little bit experience (not sure how much), and he may have gotten a power role because of that. The same may apply for Mach and/or Fircoal.

However, I don't think a mafia would try to get so much attention on themselves so early in the game, which is why I suspect Mach at this point more then I do Fircoal.

by **Aimless** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:34 pm

Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :

Vote: Puff

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:36 pm

Aimless wrote:Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :

Vote: Puff

I will FOS: Puff...
I'll wait to vote

by **everywhere116** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:16 pm

People I think are scummy, and reasons:

Syzygy: Posted around page 6-10 and just showed up last page.
Puff: Posted very early and hasnt come back. Definate submarine.
pyro: Threw out that random vote against Fircoal. Noob mafia slip up.

by **everywhere116** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:22 pm

To my list:

Puff: Bandwagoned against Mach last page. First post since page 11.
Mach: Hasnt posted much at all. Definate sub.

by **Hitman079** on Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:28 pm

Town Vote Count
[3] Machiavelli (vgmmaster, pyro55, Puff)
[1] Puff (Aimless)
[8] Undecided
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, 700 POSTS!!!! \:D/ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$ $\:D/$

by **Puff** on Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:39 am

Aimless wrote:Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :

Vote: Puff

Here you go

1. I keep forgetting to post here
2. I voted mach because vgm raised a good point, mach did look suspicious.
3. If your voting me for agreeing with others which might lead to a bandwagon then unvote mach
vote aimless
4. that (what you did) is no excuse to vote someone. That is trying to start a bandwagon

by **Fircoal** on Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:47 am

Puff wrote:
Aimless wrote:Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :

Vote: Puff

Here you go

1. I keep forgetting to post here
2. I voted mach because vgm raised a good point, mach did look suspicious.
3. If your voting me for agreeing with others which might lead to a bandwagon then unvote mach
vote aimless
4. that (what you did) is no excuse to vote someone. That is trying to start a bandwagon

Lamest defense ever. Vote: Puff

by **Aimless** on Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:32 am

Puff wrote:3. If your voting me for agreeing with others which might lead to a bandwagon then unvote mach
vote aimless
4. that (what you did) is no excuse to vote someone. That is trying to start a bandwagon

I'm voting for you because :

-e^i*pi : I think the wolves are submarining.

Puff wrote:1. I keep forgetting to post here

Anarkistsdream wrote:Considering that I have seen Puff and Pyro55 BOTH in other threads fairly often, I feel suspicious about their motives...

min({x: x is prime}) : At the moment, from past actions (or inactions), you, pyro55, and vgmaster are topping my list of scum candidates. This was mentioned well before the bandwagon against Mach began (see page 21). That you are also all voting for Mach strikes me as strange, and additionally scummy.