Conquer Club

Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Rodion on Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:48 pm

I'd like to know if there's precedent of the account sitter being punished for an abuse while the account holder is not held responsible.
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby jefjef on Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:03 am

Yes. Many times.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Rodion on Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:13 am

Please, tell me more.

What are the requirements for such a ruling?
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby rdsrds2120 on Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:06 pm

Rodion wrote:Please, tell me more.

What are the requirements for such a ruling?


Just post your case in the Cheating and Abuse forum if you feel it is worth being looked it, and I'm sure it will be reviewed accordingly.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby jefjef on Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:34 pm

Account sitters are only allowed to take your turns to make sure you don't miss any. They are not pinch hitters to be used to step in for strategic advantages (Like on maps you don't know).

They are NOT allowed to create any games on your account OR join any non-tournament games for you.

They are NOT allowed to forum post as you while sitting your account. Same goes with pm and wall other than game related questions with partners.

If they mess with your account at all like your avi/sig/friend-foe list and personal account stuff that could also be considered abuse.

In other words. Most anything other than taking turns is abuse.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Rodion on Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:56 pm

What I asked is: is this abuse necessarily punishing both the holder and the sitter? Is it possible only the sitter is punished? In which circunstances? Have a link to a precedent on that?

Thanks!
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Ace Rimmer on Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:21 am

Rodion wrote:What I asked is: is this abuse necessarily punishing both the holder and the sitter? Is it possible only the sitter is punished? In which circunstances? Have a link to a precedent on that?

Thanks!


viewtopic.php?f=239&t=129678

precedent, only sitter warned.
User avatar
Lieutenant Ace Rimmer
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:22 pm

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Rodion on Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:36 am

Thank you, Jake! :)
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby rdsrds2120 on Fri Nov 12, 2010 5:23 pm

The above example is an account of Account Hijacking, in which case the sitter does get in trouble.

If the Account holder is letting the sitter on solely for the purpose of strategic advantage in games, point gain, etc., then it is treated as the next level of Major/Severe infraction as noted in the Community Guidelines'
I do hope this clears up any other questions that you have, Rodion.

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby Rodion on Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:34 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:The above example is an account of Account Hijacking, in which case the sitter does get in trouble.

If the Account holder is letting the sitter on solely for the purpose of strategic advantage in games, point gain, etc., then it is treated as the next level of Major/Severe infraction as noted in the Community Guidelines'
I do hope this clears up any other questions that you have, Rodion.

-rd


Hell no! The sitter in question made a pretty dumb move! He attacked me in a no spoils build up game with no real purporse. Besides, the sitter if FOEd by me and he probably knew that.

I was just thinking he didn't follow guidelines because the holder had around 100 turns to make (some with less than 2 hours remaining), yet he decided to play my game (which had 22+ hours remaining), so we can clearly say the holder was not in danger of losing the turn.

Am I right?
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby jefjef on Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:18 pm

Rodion wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:The above example is an account of Account Hijacking, in which case the sitter does get in trouble.

If the Account holder is letting the sitter on solely for the purpose of strategic advantage in games, point gain, etc., then it is treated as the next level of Major/Severe infraction as noted in the Community Guidelines'
I do hope this clears up any other questions that you have, Rodion.

-rd


Hell no! The sitter in question made a pretty dumb move! He attacked me in a no spoils build up game with no real purporse. Besides, the sitter if FOEd by me and he probably knew that.

I was just thinking he didn't follow guidelines because the holder had around 100 turns to make (some with less than 2 hours remaining), yet he decided to play my game (which had 22+ hours remaining), so we can clearly say the holder was not in danger of losing the turn.

Am I right?


No. Doesn't matter how much time. When I sit for someone from day X to day Y I will usually take all turns that are up (Depending how many turns and if I need a break) 100 games is a LOT to sit. He may have just made a mistake. I know after running hours of turns they all start to look the same and color confusion can set in. It's possible that he took turns on maps he knows and likes before the others. I do that sometimes. Let the ones I don't like or know sit while I take care of the others.

But even if he did do that intentionally it wouldn't be sitting abuse. It could be considered attempted intentional game throwing but that would be really really hard to prove. Now if he kept on doing it then yes.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Question concerning a possible sitting abuse

Postby rdsrds2120 on Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:03 am

jefjef wrote:
Rodion wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:The above example is an account of Account Hijacking, in which case the sitter does get in trouble.

If the Account holder is letting the sitter on solely for the purpose of strategic advantage in games, point gain, etc., then it is treated as the next level of Major/Severe infraction as noted in the Community Guidelines'
I do hope this clears up any other questions that you have, Rodion.

-rd


Hell no! The sitter in question made a pretty dumb move! He attacked me in a no spoils build up game with no real purporse. Besides, the sitter if FOEd by me and he probably knew that.

I was just thinking he didn't follow guidelines because the holder had around 100 turns to make (some with less than 2 hours remaining), yet he decided to play my game (which had 22+ hours remaining), so we can clearly say the holder was not in danger of losing the turn.

Am I right?


No. Doesn't matter how much time. When I sit for someone from day X to day Y I will usually take all turns that are up (Depending how many turns and if I need a break) 100 games is a LOT to sit. He may have just made a mistake. I know after running hours of turns they all start to look the same and color confusion can set in. It's possible that he took turns on maps he knows and likes before the others. I do that sometimes. Let the ones I don't like or know sit while I take care of the others.

But even if he did do that intentionally it wouldn't be sitting abuse. It could be considered attempted intentional game throwing but that would be really really hard to prove. Now if he kept on doing it then yes.


This isn't entirely true either. When sitting someone else's games, you're supposed to take them only when someone is in danger of missing a turn.

Rodion - if you suspect foul play, like I said, feel free to open up a C&A and elaborate there. Potentially throwing games may or may not be the case, but it's always better to check 'just in case'.

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users