Moderator: Community Team
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english
probably false...
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Kugelblitz22 wrote:static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english
probably false...
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.
Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
Neutrino wrote:Kugelblitz22 wrote:static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english
probably false...
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.
Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
These IQ tests might not be very accurate, but the personality tests are worse.
"Which shape do you feel is more inteligent?"
'I dont know, they are both freaking abstract shapes! How can abstract shapes be intelligent!'
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.
Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
btownmeggy wrote:Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.
Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.
btownmeggy wrote:Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.
Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.
Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.
btownmeggy wrote:BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.
Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.
How does one "fail" an IQ test??
Aries wrote:I had to leave within 5 minutes, so I didn't finish it lol, but I thought normal was 130, and 100 was just enough to get yourself dressed
btownmeggy wrote:BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.
Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.
How does one "fail" an IQ test??
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee