Moderator: Community Team
What makes you think that a replacement for duday would have anything particularly useful to say about lalaland? Said person would have to go back and reread thread before they would have any idea what was going on. And after that pretty much all they could do is either A: agree with the case against him because that is what people appear to be doing, or B: disagree because they just don't see much evidence. The only plausible way that this replacement would be able to quickly make a significant impact on the lalaland issue would be for the two of them to have related roles and for the replacement to confirm lalaland's claim. Unless we see something pointing towards that, I don't see how waiting an indeterminate amount of time for the replacement of a person who never showed any real relation to lalaland through his few posts would actually help us on this issue...oldrisky44 wrote:I just re-read the thread. duday is being replaced...correct? If so, why don't we wait to see what the replacement has to say before we bandwagon lala. duday never really said anything, so maybe we can get some new info from the replacement?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
cena-rules wrote:At this moment, I think we can do 1 of 2 things
1) Random bandwagon someone
2) No lynch
1 as we have seen in other mafia's sucks
2 also so sucks, but means we can get info
vote no lynch
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:cena-rules wrote:At this moment, I think we can do 1 of 2 things
1) Random bandwagon someone
2) No lynch
1 as we have seen in other mafia's sucks
2 also so sucks, but means we can get info
vote no lynch
I think this post sounds scummy to me. It's very over simplified and that's the kinda thing that scum would want to do. Make it look like you only have two choices when there are others out there. I also would say we don't have to pick someone random but rather someone scummy and isn't it the job of town to lynch the scummy ones in case they're scum?
oldrisky44 wrote:Think about this...
If we assume there are 2 mafia (4 total) in each faction and we know 1 is already out (3 left)...
We are now suspicious of 3 players, cena, duday and lala.
Assuming we (town) are right in our suspicions, chance are each mafia will probably vote for the other mafia... again assuming those we are suspicious of are also suspicious of each other.
If we can determine which mafia is not down by 1 and vote for one of the 2 man scum teams, we can effectively wipe out the mob in one day.
Or did I just blow that by saying it?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
oldrisky44 wrote:Think about this...
If we assume there are 2 mafia (4 total) in each faction and we know 1 is already out (3 left)...
We are now suspicious of 3 players, cena, duday and lala.
Assuming we (town) are right in our suspicions, chance are each mafia will probably vote for the other mafia... again assuming those we are suspicious of are also suspicious of each other.
If we can determine which mafia is not down by 1 and vote for one of the 2 man scum teams, we can effectively wipe out the mob in one day.
Or did I just blow that by saying it?
oldrisky44 wrote:But think about it, I said "assuming". If they are part of the discussion (and they are) and they agree with the suspicions of the town, their only chance at self-preservation is to vote mafia at night. It's just like the cold war. They are each pointing big guns at each other's heads. The last to pull the trigger loses! The only way the town gets bloodied is if we are all paranoidly suspicious of the wrong people and the mob is fooling us all.
OOh, that's a scary thought.
aage wrote:Your vote was on Fircoal FYI.
Oldrisky, is there a reason you're not choosing one of your suspects as a "main suspect" and start voting someone again?
Lastly, there still is no replacement for Duday. Colton, go get someone. I'm betting ga7 would join.
Lastly I'm rereading the first few pages and thinking... A role with seriously NOTHING in it (not even a vote) is not worth anything. Not even to town. I'm guessing there's more behind Edocsil than he likes to make us believe. It's reason enough for me to change my vote:
unvote vote edocsil
Simply because I want to know what power there is behind that role of yours. If there's no power, we lost nothing by lynching you. If there is, I think it's well worth trying to get it on the table. I'm thinking of a third party sk role that can't vote, or something like that. With these 2 mafia factions and the dead godfather I'm not unkeen on lynching a 3rd party on day 1.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Very true. In this situation, 3rd party's bad for everyone, causing unwanted mischief. Honestly, (though this will prolly sound scummy, but whatevs) a 3rd party kill might be better than a mafia kill, especially if the mafia we lynch is apart of the dead Godfather's mafia. I mean, think about it: the opposing mafias are gonna try to kill each other, since the opposing mafia is more of a threat than the town. And if we lynch another from colton's mafia, then his mafia's no longer a threat, therefore, town is targeted. In conclusion, vote edocsil.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
edocsil wrote:Do we want to just bandwagon Duday for not showing up? Nothing pisses me off like people who sign up and don't play.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
colton24 wrote:Vote Count
Fircoal(1)-freezie
no lunch(2)-cena-rules, ???
lalaland(2)-spiesr, AceArtemis
Edocsil(2)-aage, Victor Sullivan
Not voting: Fircoal, duday53, edocsil, oldrisky44
With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch
oldrisky44 wrote:Technically the ??? are on no LUNCH. Just saying.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users