You dont make it to 1614 points without making a few enemies

[Beckytheblondie]

Competition requires competitors. Competitors win and competitors lose. The results of competitive play are winners and losers. Winners and losers are not mutually exclusive. One can be both a winner and a loser. Competition and fun are not mutually exclusive. Winning and losing form a dichotomy but winning and losing do not form such a mutual exclusivity in the arena of Conquer Club. In fact, I claim a corresponding relationship between the two. I claim that the bigger winner you are the bigger loser you are. This is, of course, subject to the loser's own subjectivity. I suggest that everyone I have ever lost to is a loser and that everyone I have ever beaten is a winner. Thus results in BexXx's theory of correlative gains and losses. When I win a match I am a game-winner but a life-loser. When I lose a match, I am a game-loser but I am a life-winner. Any time you lose a game on conquer club you can cite this theory. Citing this theory will, by its very definition, let you fulfill its destiny. This is only, of course, if we can break down the present ideas that bind citing theories and life-losing are the same. If we can agree that the act of citing a theory is intellectually stimulating and filled with prowess then we can call those who cite theories as winners. Therefore by citing ANY theory in game chat you are a winner. But you must cite this specific theory to prove that your opponent is a loser. An opponent can, without presence of BexXx's theory of correlative gains and losses, in turn cite any theory to prove he/she is a winner. But this theory trumps by virtue of the mutual relationship between being a winner and a loser on conquer club. Have fun winners.

[shocked439]

You have 2583 points, this has caused major confusion and makes me think your theory may like credibility Other than that, well put.

[elfish_lad]

I read (most) of the OP thoughts above. Some good stuff there. I may steal most of it for the next newsletter. However, reading between the lines, I think this is what he really is saying: "someone buy me a pony."

E.

[Army of GOD]

"Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose."

[stahrgazer]

You have 2583 points, this has caused major confusion and makes me think your theory may like credibility Other than that, well put.

By his own theory, the number of points he has makes him a life loser. Likely so; getting that many points must mean CC is pretty much his life

*smooch* Becky. Very zen post.

[Chuuuuck]

You have 2583 points, this has caused major confusion and makes me think your theory may like credibility Other than that, well put.

By his own theory, the number of points he has makes him a life loser. Likely so; getting that many points must mean CC is pretty much his life

*smooch* Becky. Very zen post.

Becky is a life loser... don't you all know that?

[Joodoo]

You have 2583 points, this has caused major confusion and makes me think your theory may like credibility Other than that, well put.

I think he meant 2614-1000=1614 since everyone starts at 1000 points when they start off.
But then the title should be changed to "amass 1614 points".

[Crazyirishman]

He could have played an lt. that made him think of this theory.

[Johnny Rockets]

I'm Freakin' Awsome.

Reguardless if I'm wearing my Swords, or My stripes this month.


Johnny Rockets

[AndyDufresne]

Hm, I think for the most part I've made it to 1700+ points without making any in-game enemies. But that may be a result of the settings and types of games I play.


--Andy

[Denise]

I adore Becky! He always makes me laugh and laugh. +

[Commander62890]

Hm, I think for the most part I've made it to 1700+ points without making any in-game enemies. But that may be a result of the settings and types of games I play.


--Andy

You'll typically make the most enemies in:

- Large Public Escalating (noobs taking bonuses)
- Public Singles - Flat/No Spoils (alliances, noobs killing you without just cause)
- Speed Freestyle of any kind, except team

[ljex]

Hm, I think for the most part I've made it to 1700+ points without making any in-game enemies. But that may be a result of the settings and types of games I play.


--Andy

You'll typically make the most enemies in:

- Large Public Escalating (noobs taking bonuses)
- Public Singles - Flat/No Spoils (alliances, noobs killing you without just cause)
- Speed Freestyle of any kind, except team

Love speed freestyle but people really do rate out of spite. Also part of speed is being there watching the game which causes way more arguments...if you arent there you just see what happened not how it happened all the time. Also you have time to cool off and let it go in casual where as in speed its heat of the moment.

[AAFitz]

losers are always complaining about the dice, while the winners are out ffing the prom queen.

[AgentSmith88]

Carla was the prom queen

[ronsizzle]

Hm, I think for the most part I've made it to 1700+ points without making any in-game enemies. But that may be a result of the settings and types of games I play.


--Andy

i am an in game enemy of yours. so you can retract that statement right there. Game 6195845 your silence pissed me off!

[nietzsche]

laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame

[azezzo]

Too bad your new Karate Kid movie sucks, does that make you a winner or a loser?
I'm confused