Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Backglass wrote:If your poll is "Like Bush" Yes/No, why the big cut-n-paste about brasilian biofuels?
I hate bush...but am for alternative energy sources.
Stopper wrote:The idea of producing fuel from plants, either as a way of reducing fossil fuel usage or avoiding global warming, strikes me as a crock of shite.
The amount of land we'd need to completely replace petrol and other fuels currently in use would probably preclude, er, feeding people.
Nuclear fission is the only way to go, people. (Don't ask me how that could be used to replace fuel in cars. My ideas are generally only half-baked.)
flashleg8 wrote:You could generate electricity from your Nuclear power to charge fuel cell cars...
In the UK at least the use of biofuels would be a godsend the struggling agricultural industry. Large amounts of dairy farms can no longer stay economically viable, this land could be changed to growing plant crops for biofuels. Possibly a government subsidy could be used to kick start this drive - but this could be financed from the VAT on existing hydrocarbon fuels.
Marvaddin wrote:I really hate Bush, and I think a swastika is very appropriated.
Anyway, Im happy because US fucking government is not awaiting for more natural catastrophes before think a bit about save the planet.
Marvaddin wrote:Swastika is very well placed on Bush name.
Marvaddin wrote:The US government cant prevent catastrophes, but many of them, like droughts (well, dunno if its the correct name... I mean a long time with no rain) and so fire and desertification, and floods are being caused by the increase of global temperature, so we cant wait, we need act to stop it as soon as possible. And US government wasnt cooperating until now. Im talking about catastrophes that are caused by humankind.
areon wrote:To be fair, the West and it's high demands for mahogany wood plus other products just might be impacting the destruction of rainforests some.
Stopper wrote:The idea of producing fuel from plants, either as a way of reducing fossil fuel usage or avoiding global warming, strikes me as a crock of shite.
The amount of land we'd need to completely replace petrol and other fuels currently in use would probably preclude, er, feeding people.
Nuclear fission is the only way to go, people. (Don't ask me how that could be used to replace fuel in cars. My ideas are generally only half-baked.)
nunz wrote:In NZ if we were to harvest the left over stalks and chaff after the wheat, barley etc was harvested , from just one little town alone (am thinking of Ashburton), we would have enough ethanol to run at leat 50% of our cars for a year.
ethanol doesn't preclude feeding people. In fact the two can go hand in hand.
My lawn mower is getting ready to runon the grass it mows .... now I just need to perfect my brewing technique to make it drinkable as well so I can mow the lawn, feed my mower nad fgeel no pain while doing so
Stopper wrote:
BTW, sometimes I wish I still had a diesel car. A number of people in Wales had been caught a while back using vegetable oil to run their diesel cars and tractors. Chips and environmentalism at the same time. If only...
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap