Add option to start with 5 cards *rejected*

by **CreepyUncleAndy** on Sat Mar 10, 2007 3:45 pm

A new option for starting new games:

How many cards will each player start with?
:idea:

0 -- Default
1
2
3
4
5

by **RobinJ** on Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:21 pm

No I don't like it - I prefer to have the challenge of establishing myself the normal way and this could put someone really in control from the outset

by **Luke035** on Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:21 pm

I agree with Robin. Where is the challenge when the cards are handed to you without earning anything first? Bad idea IMO.

by **Evil Semp** on Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:57 pm

Aren't there enough thinks to complain about already? The dice, the countries you get to start with.

Website · by **Bad Speler** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:54 pm

NO. that gives to big an advantage for the 1st player....NOOOOO

by **hecter** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:02 pm

Bad Speler wrote:NO. that gives to big an advantage for the 1st player....NOOOOO

It would actually give a bigger advantage to all the players after him if it's escalating.

Website · by **Bad Speler** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:14 pm

good point, but in flat rate....NOOOO

by **AndyDufresne** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:34 pm

I say No.

--Andy

by **Backglass** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:40 pm

Did anyone miss the fact that he said "OPTION"?

Whats wrong with more options? If you don't like the style of game, don't start or join one. I hate freestyle games...so I don't play them. Others love them...to each his own.

The more options the better in my opinion.

by **AndyDufresne** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:10 pm

I agree usually with the more options, the better...but I don't think this is even a good option.

--Andy

by **RobinJ** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:48 pm

^
Agreed!

by **yowzer14** on Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:48 pm

CreepyUncleAndy wrote:A new option for starting new games:

How many cards will each player start with?

0 -- Default
1
2
3
4
5

Nope, I think cards must be earned...

by **reverend_kyle** on Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:13 am

hecter wrote:
Bad Speler wrote:NO. that gives to big an advantage for the 1st player....NOOOOO

It would actually give a bigger advantage to all the players after him if it's escalating.

Imagine it in no cards games.

*head explodes*

by **CreepyUncleAndy** on Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:59 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
hecter wrote:
Bad Speler wrote:NO. that gives to big an advantage for the 1st player....NOOOOO

It would actually give a bigger advantage to all the players after him if it's escalating.

Imagine it in no cards games.

*head explodes*

Oh, man, that would be SWEET!

"Round 18....should I play my ONLY mixed set for the entire game NOW, knowing I won't be getting any more cards EVER, or should I WAIT?"

by **corner G** on Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:01 pm

so many people don't like it, so it's not worth lack doing.

by **Backglass** on Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:49 am

corner G wrote:so many people don't like it, so it's not worth lack doing.

So, your channeling lack now? Can you speak for my dead grandmother too?

:lol:

by **lackattack** on Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:51 pm

Yet another wonderful CreepyUncleAndy suggestion :roll:

by **CreepyUncleAndy** on Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:34 pm

lackattack wrote:Yet another wonderful CreepyUncleAndy suggestion

I'm going for the title!

by **Coleman** on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:31 pm

I think in freestyle flat rate terminator I would like to be able to make everyone start with a mixed set.

For any other option I can't see this being a good idea. :wink:

Add option to start with 5 cards rejected

Allow an optional new game creation setting for X cards to be dealt to each player at the beginning of the game? ((where X = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 }))

Add option to start with 5 cards rejected

Re: Add option to start with 5 cards

Who is online