jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Ba-dum, Crash!
Moderator: Community Team
jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:vote age for being defensive. Obvious scum. case closed.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Foxglove wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove
Vote safariguy5 for being the first person to vote me, in my first ever mafia game!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
colton24 wrote:Vote duday for wearing shades
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
duday53 wrote:
Well done mod.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
safariguy5 wrote:Man, this is why I kinda like a Night 0 for any investigative and nonkilling roles. Day 1 blind like this is hard to get a lynch because everyone is blank.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
We have to take the person in question into consideration here Squirrel. This is colton we're talking about, and scummy voting is something he's known for. It's always been easy to default vote colton when we have nothing else. I would be cautious about jumping on him so early.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
wercool wrote:VOTE COLTON okMr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
unvote
edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
safariguy5 wrote:what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.
wercool wrote:that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
MeDeFe wrote:edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
That can't be right, unless I've got some funky powers I don't know about. I also distinctly recall unvoting.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:safariguy5 wrote:what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.
Actually, it used to be even bigger before I got here. I just got to see the last of the regulars fade away.wercool wrote:that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
I don't understand this. I might make some funny posts occasionally, but when I'm interested in a mafia I normally provide as much analysis as I can. Do you disagree?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users