edocsil wrote:HERE WE GOOO! That's all 12, roles are being sent. Confirm in this thread, link will be in the PM.
chloroform
Moderator: Community Team
edocsil wrote:HERE WE GOOO! That's all 12, roles are being sent. Confirm in this thread, link will be in the PM.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
edocsil wrote:PM me again if you need additional clarification.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:vote aage for that unnessacary a in his name
colton24 wrote:Vote duday for wearing shades
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
aage wrote:naxus wrote:vote aage for that unnessacary a in his name
My name has nothing whatsoever to do with "age". I mean, what kind of nickname would that be? No, it might be an abreviation, or something you haven't got a clue about. No problems with the vote, but just so that that's clear.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
jrl332005 wrote:vote Mr. Squirrel for jumping to conclusions with aage. He was just stating how his name had nothing to do with age. He even said he was fine with the vote, just clearing some would-be confusion. Getting a little squirrely there?
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Users browsing this forum: No registered users