Moderator: Community Team
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
I think that you should accept the fact that you are a retard who doesn't like Bond.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
I think that you should accept the fact that you are a retard who doesn't like Bond.
I think you should accept the fact, that not liking bond does not make you a retard. Also you should accept the fact that your never going to be the spam king.
hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
I think that you should accept the fact that you are a retard who doesn't like Bond.
I think you should accept the fact, that not liking bond does not make you a retard. Also you should accept the fact that your never going to be the spam king.
WRONG! I already am the spam king.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
I think that you should accept the fact that you are a retard who doesn't like Bond.
I think you should accept the fact, that not liking bond does not make you a retard. Also you should accept the fact that your never going to be the spam king.
WRONG! I already am the spam king.
You got the title out of cheating it, you aren't the true spam king.
hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:hecter wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
I think that you should accept the fact that you are a retard who doesn't like Bond.
I think you should accept the fact, that not liking bond does not make you a retard. Also you should accept the fact that your never going to be the spam king.
WRONG! I already am the spam king.
You got the title out of cheating it, you aren't the true spam king.
WRONG! I am the true spam king!
flashleg8 wrote:Fircoal wrote:this is a baised poll! The last option should be different.
Looks perfectly fair to me![]()
Anyway. Connery is good but Moore is the quintessential Bond. He combines the classic one liner double entendres and the raised eyebrow moments. He plays the English gentleman bond perfectly. Imagine him fight a villain for his life, then coolly straighten his tie, brush off his sleeves and head back to shag his bird! Plus he's in the best Bond films as well.
luns101 wrote:It's hard to argue against Sean Connery. I haven't seen the latest Bond movie, "Casino Royale". My friends told me that Daniel Craig was surprisingly good in it. They look forward to seeing him in more Bond movies.
For those of you who saw Daniel Craig, what did you think of his performance?
flashleg8 wrote:luns101 wrote:It's hard to argue against Sean Connery. I haven't seen the latest Bond movie, "Casino Royale". My friends told me that Daniel Craig was surprisingly good in it. They look forward to seeing him in more Bond movies.
For those of you who saw Daniel Craig, what did you think of his performance?
He was ace, he will be an excellent Bond in my opinion (as a huge bond fan). I've had a great respect for his acting in some of the other stuff I've seen him in also (esp. "Layer Cake") so I knew he'd be good. A big thing was made (over here) of the fact he's blond - I have no idea why this should preclude you to play Bond! People throw the phrase "more like the original Ian Fleming's Bond" about too much when referring to different actor’s portrayals of Bond - but I think he is definitely the most like the books type Bond.
Casino Royal: Great film, very dark and stripped back (no gadgets, camp villains, more realistic girls etc). If you love Texas hold 'em go and see itIts less of a "rollercoaster" action type film but it has some excellent fight scenes. More "real life" thriller style than previous Bonds.
flashleg8 wrote:luns101 wrote:It's hard to argue against Sean Connery. I haven't seen the latest Bond movie, "Casino Royale". My friends told me that Daniel Craig was surprisingly good in it. They look forward to seeing him in more Bond movies.
For those of you who saw Daniel Craig, what did you think of his performance?
He was ace, he will be an excellent Bond in my opinion (as a huge bond fan). I've had a great respect for his acting in some of the other stuff I've seen him in also (esp. "Layer Cake") so I knew he'd be good. A big thing was made (over here) of the fact he's blond - I have no idea why this should preclude you to play Bond! People throw the phrase "more like the original Ian Fleming's Bond" about too much when referring to different actor’s portrayals of Bond - but I think he is definitely the most like the books type Bond.
Casino Royal: Great film, very dark and stripped back (no gadgets, camp villains, more realistic girls etc). If you love Texas hold 'em go and see itIts less of a "rollercoaster" action type film but it has some excellent fight scenes. More "real life" thriller style than previous Bonds.
Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl