Moderator: Tournament Directors
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Hey UCA,
It's required that the winner of the tournament plays at least 3 games in the tournament. How you've mentioned it's only 2 games. Is this going to be a best of series to make sure it meets the requirements, or were you planning on a 1 and done style?
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
HighlanderAttack wrote:If this changes to escalating by some chance I am in. I just dont like multi flat and no spoil games
Thanks
UCAbears wrote:EDIT: The Final game is now extended to 3 games. And, if a different person should win each game, there will be a final 3 player game to decide the winner.
Night Strike wrote:UCAbears wrote:EDIT: The Final game is now extended to 3 games. And, if a different person should win each game, there will be a final 3 player game to decide the winner.
What I would do is say the first person to 2 wins in the finals wins the tournament. This could mean only 2 games are needed in the final, but it still falls within the minimum requirement. It's also a slightly more familiar format as it has been used in other tournaments.
Night Strike wrote:UCAbears wrote:EDIT: The Final game is now extended to 3 games. And, if a different person should win each game, there will be a final 3 player game to decide the winner.
What I would do is say the first person to 2 wins in the finals wins the tournament. This could mean only 2 games are needed in the final, but it still falls within the minimum requirement. It's also a slightly more familiar format as it has been used in other tournaments.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users