Moderator: Community Team
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
captainwalrus wrote:Vote count.
Vodean 4 - Rainbow Eater, Colton, lhcguy, spieser
UTA 1 - Safari
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:You are aware, that that is not the sort of claim people will be looking for, and that in this game claiming "town" is absolutely meaningless as the game appears to consist of the scum groups, the revolution and the peasants?vodean wrote:as for a claim, i claim TOWN!
OBVIOUSLY, town is peasants, as everyone else is mafia or cops... as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
Rainbow Eater wrote:vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:You are aware, that that is not the sort of claim people will be looking for, and that in this game claiming "town" is absolutely meaningless as the game appears to consist of the scum groups, the revolution and the peasants?vodean wrote:as for a claim, i claim TOWN!
OBVIOUSLY, town is peasants, as everyone else is mafia or cops... as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
And which side is the mafia and which side is the cops. Since you are a peasant, you of course know this.
captainwalrus wrote:The Havana mob calls the hits. they get a night kill, like a normal mafia, but they loose if they are eliminated, or if Batista's Regime is eliminated.
Batista's regime are the people who steal and beat up on the peasants, using various roles which I will not disclose yet. They win if the 26th of july movement is eliminated.
The peasants are all vanilla townies. they win if the 26th of july movement wins
The 26th of july movements are a pro-town militant group. They can recruit people from the peasant group, and they win if Batista's regime is eliminated.
Thats why i didnt lie. sorry, im still a bit new here. The reason why it is so bad is that they can add to a BW without being a part of it in the books, thus getting less attention, and will not be voted. OF COURSE, the others are bad, but they are conspicuous as elephants in a flock of geese.spiesr wrote:Well, yes it is generally considered pretty scummy lie about your claim. I mean there are certain instances where it would be okay for someone to keep some information secret, but this clearly would not be one of those times. Also, your argument that the people FOS'ing you are somehow worse than those voting you doesn't really seem to hold water.vodean wrote:oh, ok sorry. But if i did claim 26th movement, the members might take the risk of revealing themselves to kill me. Then id die anyway because my claim would be false...
As For the FOS, its because there is NO evidence against me, but im getting FOSed and Voted anyway. The worst are the ones who Fos'ed me, because they're all non-commital, and if they're scum and this BW fails, they can jump on the next one.
You haven't really produced any reason for you not to be lynched I my eyes, so I will vote vodean. I would however like to hear more from those people who haven't posted today, or have posted very little...
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
colton24 wrote:Vodean you shouldn't of hammered yesterday without reasoning. Should of gave wer a chance instead of hammering by jumping on the end of the BW
vodean wrote:colton24 wrote:Vodean you shouldn't of hammered yesterday without reasoning. Should of gave wer a chance instead of hammering by jumping on the end of the BW
IM sorry. i had just logged on and was a bit short of time. I DID give a reason. i was the firsts one to point out how wer had been defensive and a bit scummy. in my last post, i believe i did aswell. See, this is what i mean. You point fingers, but keep a low profile by not voting me! now THAT is scummy.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Well, the good news there is that they were vanilla townie style peasants rather than potentially powerful members of the revolution or even powered peasants. Now if the revolution's recruiting abilities had been knocked out, then we would really be in trouble. For a game like this it seems like lynching a vanilla peasant day 1 and then having another killed night one doesn't seem to have been that bad of an outcome. I mean the odds of you actually lynching a scum on day one in a game like this has to be around like 1/4th on a good day? The deal is that from here on we need to start being successful at something, lynching a scum today, or the revolution having a success in their activities.UTAlan wrote:As far as Day 1 goes, I'm worried that we've lost 2 peasants already.
Colton24 has voted for you. Don't accuse him of doing otherwise when it is fairly easy to look at the vote count. Also accusing everyone, or most of those, who accuse you is bad form and definitely not helping your case. Colton24 also happens to be guilty of this flaw from yesterday. Remember how well that went?vodean wrote:See, this is what i mean. You point fingers, but keep a low profile by not voting me! now THAT is scummy.
Well your general behavior has appeared rather scummy, so it is hard to defend everything you have done like that. In the future try to alter your play style in a manner where you won't be seen as scummy in general. Look at other games and pay attention to the people who posted quite a bit yet were not seriously suspected. Try to glean a little from how they played. Then you likely won't be gone after as much until people have a more solid reason. Then you just have to find a way to counter that point and if you do that and aren't seen as generally scummy you might get off the hook.vodean wrote:I also have NO idea whatsoever how to defend myself.
And look how well that worked out for him.vodean wrote:On day 1 wer made no defense.
Technically you were third party. Your erratic and generally poorly thought out behavior in that other game gives you an example of what to avoid in future games.vodean wrote:In my other game, i was town, and lynched day 1.
colton24 wrote:vodean wrote:colton24 wrote:Vodean you shouldn't of hammered yesterday without reasoning. Should of gave wer a chance instead of hammering by jumping on the end of the BW
IM sorry. i had just logged on and was a bit short of time. I DID give a reason. i was the firsts one to point out how wer had been defensive and a bit scummy. in my last post, i believe i did aswell. See, this is what i mean. You point fingers, but keep a low profile by not voting me! now THAT is scummy.
Since when is voting somebody scummy?
You hammered too quickly and no you did not have a reason
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Why would either side purposefully target a vanilla peasant for a night kill? The scum would rather kill a member of the revolution and the revolution would rather kill a scum member.naxus wrote:About his claim, I think its total BS.We lynched a Peasant day one and NK another one.Theres only what 12ish people in this game, so by claiming VT your almost assured a night kill against yourself as if you are a VT and they NK you then there would be only 1, or 2 or maybe even none left of the VT.
Did anyone else notice this bit here? Looks like a secret voter/double voter/politician. Is anyone missing their vote?captainwalrus wrote:Vote count.
Vodean 4 - Rainbow Eater, Colton, lhcguy, spiser
UTA 1 - Safari
Rainbow Eater 1 - ???
spiesr wrote:Why would either side purposefully target a vanilla peasant for a night kill? The scum would rather kill a member of the revolution and the revolution would rather kill a scum member.naxus wrote:About his claim, I think its total BS.We lynched a Peasant day one and NK another one.Theres only what 12ish people in this game, so by claiming VT your almost assured a night kill against yourself as if you are a VT and they NK you then there would be only 1, or 2 or maybe even none left of the VT.Did anyone else notice this bit here? Looks like a secret voter/double voter/politician. Is anyone missing their vote?captainwalrus wrote:Vote count.
Vodean 4 - Rainbow Eater, Colton, lhcguy, spiser
UTA 1 - Safari
Rainbow Eater 1 - ???
lhcguy wrote:spiesr wrote:Why would either side purposefully target a vanilla peasant for a night kill? The scum would rather kill a member of the revolution and the revolution would rather kill a scum member.naxus wrote:About his claim, I think its total BS.We lynched a Peasant day one and NK another one.Theres only what 12ish people in this game, so by claiming VT your almost assured a night kill against yourself as if you are a VT and they NK you then there would be only 1, or 2 or maybe even none left of the VT.Did anyone else notice this bit here? Looks like a secret voter/double voter/politician. Is anyone missing their vote?captainwalrus wrote:Vote count.
Vodean 4 - Rainbow Eater, Colton, lhcguy, spiser
UTA 1 - Safari
Rainbow Eater 1 - ???
Uhm, no haven't noticed it. Very strange.. but why would a secret voter voter for Rainbow? If the secret voter is evil, he would have waited and placed the last vote on Voden (If vodean is not evil himself). If ??? is good, he might be the seer and point us towards Rainbow. But.. rather strange thing either way.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users