Moderator: Community Team
ronc8649 wrote:i am waiting for blitz and all of his thota cronies to come in here screaming that 1 v 1 is purely luck, drop, and nothing else...
AAFitz wrote:ronc8649 wrote:i am waiting for blitz and all of his thota cronies to come in here screaming that 1 v 1 is purely luck, drop, and nothing else...
1v1 is purely luck, drop and nothing else!!!
(I see no reason to make you wait)
Though I win well over 50% of them myself.. and 75% of them on world 2.1. Im extra lucky on World.
Some like 1v1s, others dont. The settings really matter the most though...some are absolutely coin flips, and others decided by skill most of the time.
Im not as good as blitz, but ill play as many 1v1s as you want manbungalow.
ManBungalow wrote:Blitzaholic.
He seems to top lots of the gameplay-orientated record categories he creates and certainly has a lot of gameplay medals. He also seems to be a good character.
So I'd like to see if >11,000 games of experience on this site actually makes him a better player than I. Therefore, I'm proposing a challenge of a pre-established (though boundless) number of 1 vs 1 singles games.
1 vs 1 games seem to be the best way to go about this as multi-player games can obviously be biased and team games are not necessarily a measure of individual skill.
Provided Blitz accepts the challenge (and does not object), the settings and map choices are otherwise limitless.
Well, there's little more I can say without some eagerly-awaited response from the man himself.
Blitzaholic wrote:stick with picking on the noobs m8, cheers
Blitzaholic wrote:gg man Game 6256967
now, if you do not mind, I would like to focus on making my map, clan business and tourney's![]()
stick with picking on the noobs m8, cheers
Beckytheblondie wrote:The fact AAFitz is 75% on World means that there is a great deal of skill involved in 1v1 games.
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Bruceswar wrote:Wait so 1 game means the world
Ronaldinho wrote:Anyone fancy lung cancer? Then stfu.
Gold Knight wrote:Beckytheblondie wrote:The fact AAFitz is 75% on World means that there is a great deal of skill involved in 1v1 games.
Or he is 75% luckier than most people on the site...
Beckytheblondie wrote:The fact AAFitz is 75% on World means that there is a great deal of skill involved in 1v1 games.
Blitzaholic wrote:Gold Knight wrote:Beckytheblondie wrote:The fact AAFitz is 75% on World means that there is a great deal of skill involved in 1v1 games.
Or he is 75% luckier than most people on the site...
Well, I would say most that know, agree aafitz is really really good on world 2.1 map.
ManBungalow wrote:Blitzaholic.
He seems to top lots of the gameplay-orientated record categories he creates and certainly has a lot of gameplay medals. He also seems to be a good character.
So I'd like to see if >11,000 games of experience on this site actually makes him a better player than I. Therefore, I'm proposing a challenge of a pre-established (though boundless) number of 1 vs 1 singles games.
1 vs 1 games seem to be the best way to go about this as multi-player games can obviously be biased and team games are not necessarily a measure of individual skill.
Provided Blitz accepts the challenge (and does not object), the settings and map choices are otherwise limitless.
Well, there's little more I can say without some eagerly-awaited response from the man himself.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:ManBungalow wrote:Blitzaholic.
He seems to top lots of the gameplay-orientated record categories he creates and certainly has a lot of gameplay medals. He also seems to be a good character.
So I'd like to see if >11,000 games of experience on this site actually makes him a better player than I. Therefore, I'm proposing a challenge of a pre-established (though boundless) number of 1 vs 1 singles games.
1 vs 1 games seem to be the best way to go about this as multi-player games can obviously be biased and team games are not necessarily a measure of individual skill.
Provided Blitz accepts the challenge (and does not object), the settings and map choices are otherwise limitless.
Well, there's little more I can say without some eagerly-awaited response from the man himself.
11,000 games was so 2008.
1 vs 1 games seem to be the best way to go about this as multi-player games can obviously be biased and team games are not necessarily a measure of individual skill.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users