WW2 Mafia Endgame_Mafia Win!

by **pancakemix** on Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:53 pm

colton24 wrote:Vote Count

Skoffin(3)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Safariguy5(1)-captainwalrus

Not Voting:/, safariguy5, cowboyz,???

With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch

I voted gregwolf.

by **Rainbow Eater** on Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:28 pm

/ you need to claim or you will be lynched. A cop visited you and he died.

by / on Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:31 pm

That Cop was /, thank you very much. :cry:

by / on Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:41 pm

Anyways, as much as I would like to claim PGO, I doubt it would fool scum anyways, since they are the ones who killed /, I'd imagine.
1. If I were a PGO , why would I shoot me from behind rather than when I walked in?
2. If I were a PGO I would claim so, I have to reason to deny it.
3. If I were a PGO, Where did scum's kill go? / Was the only one to die that night.
4. If I am scum who voluntarily killed /, why did I need to replace?
5. If I were Scum who automatically killed /, why was there only one kill?

This leave only two possibilities, I am unknowingly an auto-killer, scum's kill was blocked somehow.
/'s death had nothing to do with me, it was a scum night kill.
Either way it doesn't correlate to any known scum role.

by **Rainbow Eater** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:58 am

/ wrote:That Cop was /, thank you very much.

that is too funny. you killed yourself.

/ wrote:Anyways, as much as I would like to claim PGO, I doubt it would fool scum anyways, since they are the ones who killed /, I'd imagine.
1. If I were a PGO , why would I shoot me from behind rather than when I walked in?

I can see this and have been thinking that you are not a PGO because of this.

/ wrote:2. If I were a PGO I would claim so, I have to reason to deny it.

True this would be an easy claim and I was going to bring up point 1 if you did claim.

/ wrote:3. If I were a PGO, Where did scum's kill go? / Was the only one to die that night.

They could have been role blocked, forgot to send in night actions, or your investigation might have thwarted their attempt or changed their plans

/ wrote:4. If I am scum who voluntarily killed /, why did I need to replace?

Why does anyone need to be replaced? Could be Christmas break and no computer, I have no idea.

/ wrote:5. If I were Scum who automatically killed /, why was there only one kill?

revert to my answer for number three.

/ wrote:This leave only two possibilities, I am unknowingly an auto-killer, scum's kill was blocked somehow.

there are more than two possibilities, but these two are some of them.

/ wrote:/'s death had nothing to do with me, it was a scum night kill.

Then why was it at your house?

I agree with 1 and 2.

3, 4, 5 really hold no water because of lack of information.

You still have not claimed and the kill was at your house. you really need to claim your role.

mod can we also get some prods on people who have not posted in a few pages.

by **gregwolf121** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 2:11 pm

im still here and very confused

by / on Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:37 pm

It's quite pointless, Being visited by a cop means you killed a cop?
You are still missing the main point, there is no way that "I" had voluntarily made a kill, what you are accusing me of is that, I am scum who was investigated, and I therefor killed the cop.
How would Leading an investigation in anyway lead to a scum retaliation? This was night one, there was no evidence, how do you suppose scum would not only track the cop's action, but receive the result on the same night then off him?

If I had visited /, that would be reason for a claim, but there is absolutely no significant reason to suspect I could have visited him more than anyone else in the entire game, so what exactly are you accusing me of? The only role that would hold plausibility would be a PGO, which is a town role..... So your only possible motivation is to out a townie?

Also Skoffin has been gone since November, so...yeah.
Anyways, I don't need to claim, I have no votes on me, and town claiming needlessly just allows scum to be more selective in their kills.

Also vote Rainbow Eater, your accusations all game have been confusing and scummy.

by **captainwalrus** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:42 pm

I agree that / cannot be blamed for the death of /. Even if he is PGO, it doesn't make sense. Now, Vote rainbow eater because of my suspicions from before, when you were focusing too much on PCM for sort of irrational reasons, perhaps trying to detract us from something or someone.

by **cowboyz** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:31 pm

back on tonite to read all this mess.

by **Rainbow Eater** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:32 pm

/ wrote:It's quite pointless, Being visited by a cop means you killed a cop?
You are still missing the main point, there is no way that "I" had voluntarily made a kill, what you are accusing me of is that, I am scum who was investigated, and I therefor killed the cop.
How would Leading an investigation in anyway lead to a scum retaliation? This was night one, there was no evidence, how do you suppose scum would not only track the cop's action, but receive the result on the same night then off him?

If I had visited /, that would be reason for a claim, but there is absolutely no significant reason to suspect I could have visited him more than anyone else in the entire game, so what exactly are you accusing me of? The only role that would hold plausibility would be a PGO, which is a town role..... So your only possible motivation is to out a townie?

Also Skoffin has been gone since November, so...yeah.
Anyways, I don't need to claim, I have no votes on me, and town claiming needlessly just allows scum to be more selective in their kills.

Also vote Rainbow Eater, your accusations all game have been confusing and scummy.

you have no votes on you because we took them off until a new player arrived.

vote /

you still have not claimed and are dancing around the issue.

by / on Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:43 pm

You have yet to clarify the exact nature of your charges. A person visited me, and someone killed that person, what does that suggest I did?

by **colton24** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:58 pm

Vote Count

/(4)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121, ???
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Rainbow Eater(2)-/, captainwalrus
gregwolf121(1)-PCM

Not Voting:safariguy5, cowboyz

/ is at L-2

With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch

Rainbow Eater you didn't unvote before voting /.

by **Rainbow Eater** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:37 pm

unvote vote /

by **colton24** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:41 pm

Vote Count

/(5)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121, ???, Rainbow Eater
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Rainbow Eater(2)-/, captainwalrus
gregwolf121(1)-PCM

Not Voting:safariguy5, cowboyz

/ is at L-1

With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch

by **safariguy5** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:58 pm

Well, a roleclaim now then?

by / on Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:02 pm

Could you just save some time and modkill next time, colton? :evil:

Cpl. Nancy Van Huegostrach-Town Soldier, vanilla role. *waits for scum to bring up BWCS and hammer*

by **Rainbow Eater** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:34 pm

/ wrote:Could you just save some time and modkill next time, colton?
Cpl. Nancy Van Huegostrach-Town Soldier, vanilla role. *waits for scum to bring up BWCS and hammer*

I was your biggest proponent after night 1 and wanted a replacement to speak and shed some light on what happened last night before a quick lynch. Your character really did not seem like scum at all. Then after the past 2 pages where you constantly dodged the question of who you were and then tried to pass the blame, how am I suppose to believe that you are vanilla?

why did it take you so long to claim if you were just vanilla? You act like you are a scum boss and try and make others look bad. If you would have claimed vanilla right off the bat I probably would have believed you. And don't say it was because you did not have votes. you had a lot of votes and people removed them until we got a replacement.

by / on Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:50 pm

I already explained, I've learned not to claim unnecessarily.
There was no reasonable evidence to suggest foul play. I'm just like any other townie, so why don't YOU claim? The same reason why we don't promote mass claims, Scum doesn't need to know my role or yours, yes I'm just vanilla, but revealing that only does two things, it gives you all one more justification to lynch me without seeming scummy, and it give scum one more name to narrow down on their "Guess who" of important roles.
That is, for every role Scum knows to be unimportant, the more likely they are to hit a valuable role, especially in a small game like this.

by **safariguy5** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:18 pm

Well, I guess there's nothing more to say then.

vote /

by **Rainbow Eater** on Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:59 pm

/ wrote:I already explained, I've learned not to claim unnecessarily.

It was necessary, you had a lot of votes on you, and you were a prime suspect. The only reason you did not have votes on you at the time was because we were waiting for a replacement.

/ wrote:There was no reasonable evidence to suggest foul play.

uhmm it was at your house. You can say it doesn't matter but it does because you were investigating you and died while doing it.

/ wrote:I'm just like any other townie, so why don't YOU claim?

Because nobody died investigating me and I was never at L-1.

/ wrote:it gives you all one more justification to lynch me without seeming scummy, and it give scum one more name to narrow down on their "Guess who" of important roles

It also gives us one more name to narrow down on the "Guess who" should we lynch and not lynch. By acting defensive like you did just seems like you are hiding a scum role and can't come up with a lie.

/ wrote:That is, for every role Scum knows to be unimportant, the more likely they are to hit a valuable role, especially in a small game like this.

Information goes both ways, town needs to know who is town and by hiding and being deceptive like you did you seem scum.
You might have "learned not to claim unnecessarily", but maybe you should learn what necessary is. If you come up town I will be very disappointed.

The more information that is out there helps the town not the scum.

by **colton24** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:22 am

Vote Count

/(6)-DCR,wercool, gregwolf121, ???, Rainbow Eater, safariguy5
PCM(1)-Rainbow Eater
Rainbow Eater(2)-/, captainwalrus
gregwolf121(1)-PCM

Not Voting:cowboyz

/ is lynched

With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch

Scene

With the killing of / the night before people were all over the place. They voted skoffin for being a PGO. Although many tried to prevent the lynch and skoffin claimed it didn't matter. Rainbow Eater had been fighting hard for this, but wasn't chosen to kill skoffin. It was PCM. PCM stepped out of the shadows and blasted skoffin to pieces. Skoffin's belongings were searched and the town found nothing, but a gun and army uniform.

skoffin(/ 2.0)-Cpl. Nancy Van Huegostrach-Town Soldier has been killed!

Night 2 begins! Send your actions in!

by **deathcomesrippin** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:42 am

That was a confusing day. I am glad for some sleep.

by **gregwolf121** on Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:56 pm

deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a confusing day. I am glad for some sleep.

here here

by **colton24** on Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:28 pm

Scene

Towards dawn a masked man slipped toward his target. "Whew," he thought," I almost missed the night action." He stepped towards his target's house....

Wercool was a bit restless. He was afraid of what might be going on, who might be dead this morning. The good thing was he hadn't heard a gunshot yet. He got up at 0500 to start his patrol when he was shot with a .22 silenced pistol. Police searched the scene and found that wercool was a soldier, but they also found a cowboy hat that, according to DNA tests, didn't belong to wercool.

wercool-PFC Dredine Von Raucheston-Town Soldier has been killed!

Day 3 begins!

by **safariguy5** on Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:33 am

That cowboy hat seems awfully suspicious... eh cowboyz?

FOS cowboyz

WW2 Mafia Endgame_Mafia Win!

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 2_Man Down! Medic!!!!Who Is Telling The Truth?

Re: WW2 Mafia Night 2_Another Soldier Down!

Re: WW2 Mafia Night 2_Another Soldier Down!

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 3_Soldier Down!

Re: WW2 Mafia Day 3_Soldier Down!

Who is online