,
Moderator: Community Team

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		
 captainwalrus
				captainwalrus
			



 
		captainwalrus wrote:I agree, but wer is also a noob, so I don't want to lynch too fast. He acts scummy, but so does safari. A mason is an easy claim IMO, and can't be backed up if the other person is dead. Also, if skoffin is indeed a PGO, why vote for him? PGOs are almost always town (unless it is a fircoal game).

 captainwalrus
				captainwalrus
			



 
		captainwalrus wrote:captainwalrus wrote:I agree, but wer is also a noob, so I don't want to lynch too fast. He acts scummy, but so does safari. A mason is an easy claim IMO, and can't be backed up if the other person is dead. Also, if skoffin is indeed a PGO, why vote for him? PGOs are almost always town (unless it is a fircoal game).
EBWOP

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		

 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		safariguy5 wrote:Alright fine, I'll claim (without any pressure by votes mind you). I'm the politician (vote stealer). I stole DCR's vote day 1 because colton pm'ed me and said I had this special perk. I stole cowboyz vote night 1. I know some people think this to be scummy, but I can back this up by placing the stolen vote on anyone.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

 pancakemix
				pancakemix
			










 
		Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!

 colton24
				colton24
			














 
		colton24 wrote:Vote Count
Skoffin(4)-safariguy5,DCR,wercool,???
PCM(1)-cowboyz
Not Voting:gregwolf121,captainwalrus,Rainbow Eater,Skoffin
With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

 pancakemix
				pancakemix
			










 
		

 gregwolf121
				gregwolf121
			




 
		

 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!

 colton24
				colton24
			














 
		Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake

 captainwalrus
				captainwalrus
			



 
		safariguy5 wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake
He asked me to prove claim and I did. You look scummy for trying to prevent a lynch. FOS Rainbow Eater

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		captainwalrus wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake
How is it fake if he was the role he claimed to be?

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

 pancakemix
				pancakemix
			










 
		pancakemix wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake
If you asked me, I'd say no, wait for Skoffin to be replaced. At least then we can get something. Now it probably looks like I'm covering my tracks to you, but that vote was pretty quick I do say so. Your argument is relatively weak on the whole. I said it doesn't clear him, but that's unlikely. And why do I get the vote?
Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.
unvote vote pancake
He asked me to prove claim and I did. You look scummy for trying to prevent a lynch. FOS Rainbow Eater
1) only thing that was proven was that a vote was moved. does not mean that you are not scum.
2) you are trying to lynch a PGO, which is a waste. This has been said by more than just me yet you don't really understand what that is. This is usually a town role and wanting to lynch a town role is a scummy move.
3) you are wanting to lynch an inactive with out getting someone in here to who might shed some light on this situation. This is a scummy move.
4) you FOS me which is weak, if you really felt strong about me, stand behind your statements and place a vote. This seems to be another scummy move.
safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.


 cowboyz
				cowboyz
			

















 
		

 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!

 colton24
				colton24
			














 
		safariguy5 wrote:Fine by me, you want action?
unvote, vote Rainbow Eater

 Rainbow Eater
				Rainbow Eater
			

 
		Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Fine by me, you want action?
unvote, vote Rainbow Eater
Nice OMGUS vote.
you just keep proving my point.


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!

 colton24
				colton24
			














 
		
 gregwolf121
				gregwolf121
			




 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users