MAFIA- ATHF THE SOLE MAFIA (HOUSSAM) WINS THE GAME!!!

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:47 pm

chessplaya wrote:but geegle r u sure that he voted puff before it was night and he had to investigate him?

It must've been the first night, in the second one puff was dead :roll:

by **chessplaya** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:47 pm

whats his role?

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:47 pm

CBlake wrote:i voted for puff before i investigated him wait it was either puff or fircoal i investigated , just believe me on this one i am the cop and everywhere116 is the mafia

Check your pm's again and see if they're there.

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:48 pm

Dont you still have the pm's of your investigations?

by **chessplaya** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:48 pm

lool geegle....
unvote;cblake
vote:everywhere116
if everywhere wasnt mafia well we sure know who has our next votes

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:50 pm

Fircoal wrote:
geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116

Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.

Vote: CBlake

Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.

Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.

Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an innocent person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as innocent and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:50 pm

geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116

Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.

Vote: CBlake

Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.

Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.

Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?

Mafia trying to confuse town^^^

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:50 pm

Machiavelli wrote:Dont you still have the pm's of your investigations?

He's not allowed to quote from them. Game rules.

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:52 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116

Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.

Vote: CBlake

Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.

Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.

Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?

Mafia trying to confuse town^^^

Don't blame me, blame MB :lol:

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:53 pm

CBlake wrote:i voted for puff before i investigated him wait it was either puff or fircoal i investigated , just believe me on this one i am the cop and everywhere116 is the mafia

Crap, I missed this one. Who DID you investigate?

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:55 pm

geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116

Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.

Vote: CBlake

Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.

Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.

Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an innocent person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as innocent and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?

So CBlake is that what happened?

by **chessplaya** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:56 pm

geegle stop turning in circles we need a vote and cblake if he wasnt the cop he wouldnt have exposed himself for the mafia just vote everywhere116 if he turns up to be on our side (citizen) well cblake dies with his mafia

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:56 pm

geegel wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:Dont you still have the pm's of your investigations?

He's not allowed to quote from them. Game rules.

He can tell us what they say though.

Trying to surpress information?

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:59 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
geegel wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:Dont you still have the pm's of your investigations?

He's not allowed to quote from them. Game rules.

He can tell us what they say though.

Trying to surpress information?

geegel wrote:
CBlake wrote:
i voted for puff before i investigated him wait it was either puff or fircoal i investigated , just believe me on this one i am the cop and everywhere116 is the mafia

Crap, I missed this one. Who DID you investigate?

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:59 pm

Fos: Geegel, CBlake, Everywhere116, chessplaya, and anyone else who is acting scummy that I can't remember

I WANT OFF THE ROLLER COASTER!

by **geegel** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:01 pm

Fircoal wrote:Fos: Geegel, CBlake, Everywhere116, chessplaya, and anyone else who is acting scummy that I can't remember

I WANT OFF THE ROLLER COASTER!

Just vote everywhere116 mate.

Like I do:

vote everywhere116

P.S.:

What's wrong with rollercoasters?

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:02 pm

geegel wrote:
Fircoal wrote:Fos: Geegel, CBlake, Everywhere116, chessplaya, and anyone else who is acting scummy that I can't remember

I WANT OFF THE ROLLER COASTER!

Just vote everywhere116 mate.

Like I do:

vote everywhere116

P.S.:

What's wrong with rollercoasters?

Nothing, and just feel like I'm going to throw up, and usually I don't when I'm on roller coasters.

YOU WANT ME TO BANDWAGON! YOU SCUM! YOU SCUM!

*Runs around killing everyone*

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:03 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.

PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:06 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.

PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.

I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach. :wink:

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:07 pm

Fircoal wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.

PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.

I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach.

Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:08 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:

1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.

Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.

PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.

I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach.

Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

I'm 80-100% sure that Houssam is not scum. And who else has been in games where you explained that. I have.

by **HoussamTheGreat** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:09 pm

Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?

Now.. what the hell do we do??

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:10 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?

Now.. what the hell do we do??

I have no idea, who are these tricky scum?

by **Machiavelli** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:12 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?

Now.. what the hell do we do??

And I have explained that the game does not just end when all the mafia are de@d if it did ...

IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!

by **Fircoal** on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:13 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.

Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?

Now.. what the hell do we do??

And I have explained that the game does not just end when all the mafia are de@d if it did ...

IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!

BUT WE DON'T HAVE AN SK

MAFIA- ATHF THE SOLE MAFIA (HOUSSAM) WINS THE GAME!!!

Who is online