Chuck Mafia, Game over, Town Wins!

by **Thezzaruz** on Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:49 am

Well guys I'm going away for the weekend. I won't throw my vote now but when I'm back I'm fully prepared to vote for fircoal unless he's managed to put together a considerably stronger defence.

by **strokem1257** on Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:03 am

Sorry guys but I may or may not be on between now and Monday or Tuesday. I have a very busy weekend, but I will try to check in with the game to see if fircoal has been lynched or not yet.

unvote in case I had a vote somewhere and it ends up lynching someone in the next 2 days or so...

by **LSU Tiger Josh** on Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:50 pm

vote fircoal to get him to speak up

by **Fircoal** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:07 am

Nzen wrote:
Fircoal wrote:How was it not ironic. I was waiting to see who LSU had targeted to get a lead only for it to be me. Isn't that irony? And if not then what's your skew idea of irony?

Irony does not mean inconvenient or surprising event. Irony denotes the presence of a contradictory use or attribute of an event or concept: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony

My previous post employs an ironic tone. Despite the sacchrine promises of agreement and understanding, the whole ought indicate that I voted for you based on your unwillingness to defend yourself. Consider the following:

We know it isn't your fault, but pmchugh tried the same sort of laid-back approach and we just plum jumped the gun on him.

Literally, it suggests that we mistakenly killed pmchugh, as well as rationalizing your mysteriousness. However, we know that town lynched him because he was proven scum with the same method used today. That clearly belies my avowal that we don't hold you responsible.

To paraphrase the popular song, rain on your wedding day is not ironic. It is inconvenient, but fails to contradict the possibility or symbolism of the primarily indoor ceremony. Unless you asked LSU to not target you or perhaps you saw him targeting someone else last night, his choice falls well short of ironic.

I will admit one sincerity in my previous post. If you do happen to describe four night actions that others - or I - confirm, I will certainly unvote and defend you. However, as you ignored the opportunity again, I will revote to emphasize that I fail to share your patience: I vote Fircoal, in case / doesn't accept the other one

1) I meant that I was wanting who LSU targeted to get a lead and it being me as ironic, not the pick itself. The contradiction being that I wanted to get a lead but obviously I wouldn't like a lead against me and in mah own mind I was bringing it on.

2) sorry didn't infer that. here:

Night 1 - Pmchugh visited by Nzen
Night 2 - LSU visited by Nzen
Night 3 - LSU visited by sam_levi_11 and Nzen
Night 4 - Tal visited by no one

On the actions for Night 1 and Night 2, there may have been someone else but I have forgotten and those pms have been autodeleted. Though my memory is saying that Night 1 is how it is and Night 2 had someone else too. However I do remember Nzen was there are all of them marked.

by **Nzen** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:44 am

Fircoal wrote:Night 1 - Pmchugh visited by Nzen
Night 2 - LSU visited by Nzen
Night 3 - LSU visited by sam_levi_11 and Nzen
Night 4 - Tal visited by no one

Fircoal is telling the truth. I can't imagine he could guess this or would resist a hindsight action if he were inventing night results. It would be nice, sam levi, if you confirm or deny whether you also visited LSU. A watcher (stake-out?) sounds like it could be that 'superagent' type of role that LSU wouldn't change.

I unvote Fircoal

At the time, I formed the best conclusions possible in response to your behavior. While I do not regret accusing you, Fircoal, I apologize for the mocking tone I chose to, perhaps, upset you into flubbing a claim.

I shall not reveal my role other than to say that I am not roleblocking LSU.

by **Nzen** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:44 am

Fircoal wrote:Night 1 - Pmchugh visited by Nzen
Night 2 - LSU visited by Nzen
Night 3 - LSU visited by sam_levi_11 and Nzen
Night 4 - Tal visited by no one

Fircoal is telling the truth. I can't imagine he could guess this or would resist a hindsight action if he were inventing night results. It would be nice, sam levi, if you confirm or deny whether you also visited LSU. A watcher (stake-out?) sounds like it could be that 'superagent' type of role that LSU wouldn't change.

I unvote Fircoal

At the time, I formed the best conclusions possible in response to your behavior. While I do not regret accusing you, Fircoal, I apologize for the mocking tone I chose to, perhaps, upset you into flubbing a claim.

I shall not reveal my role other than to say that I am not roleblocking LSU.

by **sam_levi_11** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:20 am

I did visit him yes, is my role needed?

by / on Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:38 pm

Seven more days.... you know, I consider no votes on anyone to be a twelve way tie? :twisted:

Vote count
Fircoal 1 vote; LSU Tiger Josh

7 to lynch

by **strokem1257** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:22 pm

well to break that tie, vote Chu putting him at L-5

by **LSU Tiger Josh** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:23 pm

unvote vote strokem

obviously fircoal told the truth seeing how others confirmed it.

by **Nzen** on Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:51 am

strokem1257 wrote:well to break that tie, vote Chu putting him at L-5

Is chu supposed to represent Fircoal or somebody? LSU's vote suggests it does but when you vote via nickname, I can't tell.

by **strokem1257** on Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:52 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:unvote vote strokem

obviously fircoal told the truth seeing how others confirmed it.

sorry, bad skimming. I haven't been paying attention to my mafia games as much as I should lately. too much going on in RL and such. but now that I reread the last few pages I see how fircoal appears to be innocent. I will remove my vote. I didn't have anything to base my vote on so I voted for the one person I kinda know left in the game. sorry for the misunderstanding.

unvote Fircoal

by / on Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:32 pm

Vote Count

strokem1257 1 vote: LSU Tiger Josh
Three more days

by **Thezzaruz** on Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:43 pm

I have no problems with a strokem lynch tbh but I have a hard time to throw my vote as I have no real evidence/suspicions against him either.

A claim perhaps?

by **strokem1257** on Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:54 pm

Thezzaruz wrote:I have no problems with a strokem lynch tbh but I have a hard time to throw my vote as I have no real evidence/suspicions against him either.

A claim perhaps?

I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early. but if people are realyl feeling threatened by my bad skimming skills and such go ahead and vote me. but if I do get close to lynch I will claim.

by **Thezzaruz** on Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:01 am

strokem1257 wrote:I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early.

You are also less than 40 hours away from being deadline lynched...

by **strokem1257** on Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:10 am

Thezzaruz wrote:
strokem1257 wrote:I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early.

You are also less than 40 hours away from being deadline lynched...

quite true and thats only because my accuser has left the building it seems. I could very well just random vote someone and then cause a tie. but that may accidentally bring down another townie with me. I will wait til less than 24 hours before I claim. (if it is still necessary)

by **Thezzaruz** on Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:14 pm

In the absence of the claim I'll do a Vote strokem1257. Should also protect against a random lynch.

by / on Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:01 pm

Day Five Scene

The shock of losing Chuck Bartowski has halted much progress for the day, friends, family, co-workers, it seemed that nearly every person involved was involved with him. with his absence their work seemed moot.
The day continued with an awkward silence, the man who had lead many of the previews days had named another suspect. After the accused claimed his alibi so the danger of being arrested was dropped, another man had accused him in the name of progress there being no other suspects. The man who claimed to be from the CIA then turned to this new man with his suspicions, to avoid showing his ID this man he threatened to take another person with him at random to use as a shield. This was the last straw another man teamed up with the claimed CIA to kill the unstable suspect.

His ID showed him to be Ted Roark of Roark instruments, an employee admits he was the one who ordered the kills that day, triggering a full investigation of his company.

strokem1257 (FULCRUM investigation proof) Lynched, Night five begins send your actions in.