spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.
Moderator: Community Team
spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.
spiesr wrote:So are you saying we should lynch the walrus then?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.
sam_levi_11 wrote:captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.
Im here, and more than most.
Also i think this whole thing was rather pointless, pmc and thezz seemed to see things that werent there the further on they went. Neither seem particularly scummy, although i did find you use of the term "Who is winning" to be rather odd, its phrased, imo, almost like you know what their allignment is..
sam_levi_11 wrote:Not sure, rereading Thezz does seem slightly more scummy, but again its hardly screaming at me, mainly because you both argued for so long it became a mess.
More concerning is that out of all live people, only 6 of us are posting - Squirrel, spiesr, me, pmc, walrus and thezz.
Rereading, considering 4 pages or so are based around you and thezz, it shows how little we have to go on.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
We have four pages of pmc and thezzz casting suspicion on each other, that has to be good for something right?sam_levi_11 wrote:Rereading, considering 4 pages or so are based around you and thezz, it shows how little we have to go on.
If you are that determined about it we could surely lynch you here to disprove that if you wanted.pmchugh wrote:It's stupid cause you cant get anyone lynched thats active hence why I rarely get lynched.
Because you are barely alive and certainly not sentient...pancakemix wrote:Why do I get ignored?
sam_levi_11 wrote:captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.
Im here, and more than most.
Also i think this whole thing was rather pointless, pmc and thezz seemed to see things that werent there the further on they went. Neither seem particularly scummy, although i did find you use of the term "Who is winning" to be rather odd, its phrased, imo, almost like you know what their allignment is..
pmchugh wrote:I actually think my argument was fairly solid
sam_levi_11 wrote:I agree with spiesr, vote thezz to get the game moving.
spiesr wrote:Well, I just looked back and decided that the best course of action is to get this game moving by placing a few votes on someone and forcing them to defend themselves. PMC's points have convinced me that thezzz is as good of choice as any. So vote THEZZZ.
captainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Thezzaruz wrote:Could we get a VC and a prod of the inactives??
Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()
Mr. Squirrel wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:I agree with spiesr, vote thezz to get the game moving.
The page before this you were complaining about spiesr's "who is winning" attitude, and now you decide to join him in choosing sides? What's with the inconsistency?spiesr wrote:Well, I just looked back and decided that the best course of action is to get this game moving by placing a few votes on someone and forcing them to defend themselves. PMC's points have convinced me that thezzz is as good of choice as any. So vote THEZZZ.
"As good of choice as any"? We don't have a deadline right now. So we aren't pressed for a lynch. I find you pressing one very scummy. vote spiesrcaptainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
Agreed.
You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!
pmchugh wrote:captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!
Has anyone ever seen me defend my scum buddy in a game where I am scum? No, but you have all (those who know me anyway) seen me defend people when a bad accusation is put at them, speisr was active and trying to get the game going, IMO he didn't do anything scummy and since I am town I have nothing to fear from saying this. However as a mafia member I would never risk it if speisr actually was my scum buddy, because if one of is turns up scum then you lot will go after the other.
Of course this is WIFOM but how stupid would I be to do that? Its far too risky a move and scum are always more careful.
pancakemix wrote:captainwalrus wrote:I think the mafia is winning. I don't think that either of them are actually scum, and they are just distracting themselves from trying to figure out who is scum.
Thez is not that scummy.
So a discussion actually gets going and you call it distracting ourselves? Somehow, I think you don't want discussion.captainwalrus wrote:Also, does the mafia ever get a busdriver?
I'm not sure what to make of this. It's kind of random, and it's definitely not game-related. Unless, of course, you were trying to throw suspicion from yourself.
captainwalrus wrote:I just think that PMC was the only person who really thought thez was scummy and to me his argument seemed very weak, so I suggested that perhaps we should look at other things besides who PMC thinks is scummy.
And the busdriver thing I was just curious, and it didn't warrant like 4 replies.
captainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
captainwalrus wrote:Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()
The accuser has become the accused, and rightly so. WE need prods so we have more than 7 people or so.
captainwalrus wrote:spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pmchugh wrote:Its obvious, he blames falko for no reason and gets him lynched.
Thezzaruz wrote:Could we get a VC and a prod of the inactives??
captainwalrus wrote:Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()
The accuser has become the accused, and rightly so. WE need prods so we have more than 7 people or so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users