pmchugh wrote:So you took one word FBI and because it was used in a negative way you thought oh he must be scum!!!!! Even thoguh he said "COUNTER" agent.
He said "FBI counter agent". "FBI" would clearly indicate the good guys. "counter" as it is used IRL (counter terrorist, counter intelligence and so on) is
also used for the good guys. He could possibly have had language difficulties and been meaning "traitor" or something like that but I can't see why I should assume that people don't know what they post, especially as he refused to address the illogical reasoning when he was asked about it (not only from me btw).
pmchugh wrote:Lack of logic and reason? Yeah because i would expect all joke votes to be 100% logically sound. He didn't explain himself well but he didn't need to as you had nothing against him.
There was nothing in his accusation that seemed like a joke and when you make stupid and unreasonable claims/accusations you should expect to get called up on it tbh. And again, his response (or lack of it) when being asked about his accusation was much more damning for him than his initial accusation.
pmchugh wrote:And what is this poorly reasoned falko accusation!?!?!? There is no reasoning behind a random vote!
But he didn't in any way make it out to be a random vote, it was very clearly worded as a straight accusation.
pmchugh wrote:Did you honestly believe falko thought stroke was scum and wanted him lynched?
Best guess would be a slip up via poor choice of words tbh, especially as he avoided all questions about that choice of words.
pmchugh wrote:Classic! Take my post out of context (you removed the part where i quoted your reasons) and dismiss everything as nonesense followed up by OMGUS.
I answered those parts separately. If you fail to see that voting because of his post is very different from voting because of the deadline then that's your problem, not mine. (you voted for cena purely because of the deadline though, should really net you a
FOS but I'll skip that for now)
pmchugh wrote:More OMGUS you just went through my posts to accuse me now
So something that very well could have been a slip up should be completely disregarded and finding tells/slip up's/inconsistencies in your posts is somehow poor play now???
pmchugh wrote:My vote stays where it is.
I'm not surprised, think I'll send a very non-OMGUS
Vote pmchugh in return.