WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

by **Coleman** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:33 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:The army numbers seem fine in the last picture Qwert posted.

QFT

by **AndyDufresne** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:18 pm

Final Forge

---WWII Eastern Front has reached the ‘Final Forge’ Stage. I've revived this thread from the pits of the Foundry furnace and have examined the contents. Nearly every major concern has been addressed. If there are any other current concerns, please make your voice heard. There will be at least two days (but may extend pass that) for you to post any objections; if no one has posted any protest after two days the map will be deemed finished with the 'Foundry Brand' of approval and will be submitted for live play. If after two days there is still discussion going on it may continue until said discussion has reached the conclusion that the map has reached its final and polished version.

Post questions and concerns if any.

--Andy

by **Guiscard** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:20 pm

Qwert I think you need a vote...

by **AndyDufresne** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:24 pm

Those coordinates look better qwert, but now lets see the current images (names, etc) with army coordinates other than 8. Both large and small map.

--Andy

by **KEYOGI** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Excellent. Now can we have an image that has numbers from the actual xml and not something you've done yourself?

And there still remains a couple of shadows that cover borders. Move those affected borders a little and you should be done.

by **KEYOGI** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:22 pm

Sorry for going off topic, but I just noticed Andy and I both have avatars of animals that look as though they are in deep thought. LOL. :lol:

by **gavin_sidhu** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:23 pm

congrats qwert on the final forge.

by **Teya** on Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:52 pm

congrats on final forge.

Its amazing where a little work will get you.

by **Wisse** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:04 am

KEYOGI wrote:Sorry for going off topic, but I just noticed Andy and I both have avatars of animals that look as though they are in deep thought. LOL.

lol

by **Ruben Cassar** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:23 am

Wisse wrote:
KEYOGI wrote:Sorry for going off topic, but I just noticed Andy and I both have avatars of animals that look as though they are in deep thought. LOL.

lol

Wisse's avatar is cool!

Hmm...I think Andy's avatar is just sticking a finger in his mouth at the look of some bananas and not in a pensive mode like Keyogi's! :lol:

by **KEYOGI** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:42 am

I'm a big fan of Wisse's avatar as well.

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:48 am

if all agree i want first finish large map then small

by **bedplay** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:59 am

well wisse's is pretty cool, but nothing beats curious george

back to the map.

I can't see any number out on the large map, get crackin with the small!

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:13 am

Becouse i not put map in previous post :lol:

Now here

1.I testing map coordinate over 50 time before got good numbers, and Keyogy if you not satisfy again, then i must put in vote these problems.
2.Demyansk circle-in some previos work Marvadin tel me that all names must be in terittory(in others map people not strictly ask for these) and i have these problems with terittory borders and circles, but i manage to fix these, but in these case i have 2 names Novgorod and Demyans who tach circle, becouse Demyans have small terittory and large name i work to put name in terittory and circle must put to tach line. Teya ask me before and i explane to Teya and she say "tank for explane". Ihope you satisfy with these.
3. I wery sad to se that i create map only of opinion of small group people,90% of opinion came of 3-4 people, and its look like i create map for hese taste. :cry:

by **Gilligan** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:27 am

Shouldnt the rivers and things be on a key?

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:30 am

i speak before that all people can understand what its umpasabile borders.

by **gavin_sidhu** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:43 am

I'm pretty sure everyone knows there impassables.

qwert you are harsh on the bonuses, which is fine as you are harsh on all bonuses, i suggest, however, that you should make the bonuses of von Bock Army and Stalingrad Army equal (either at 4 or 5).

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:47 am

gavin_sidhu wrote
I'm pretty sure everyone knows there impassables.

qwert you are harsh on the bonuses, which is fine as you are harsh on all bonuses, i suggest, however, that you should make the bonuses of von Bock Army and Stalingrad Army equal (either at 4 or 5).

I speak these before, and ask for opinion, Marvadin get his opinion of bonuses and i apply all bonuses what Marvadin sugested.

by **gavin_sidhu** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:57 am

well i definately think von Bock should be at least the same as Stalingrad Army. von Bock borders 4 different continents and has 4 diferent border countries, stalingrad army only has 3 borders and borders only 2 continents. I would think about flip flopping the bonuses, make von Bock Army worth 5 and Stalingrad worth 4.

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:36 am

gavin_sidhu wrote
well i definately think von Bock should be at least the same as Stalingrad Army. von Bock borders 4 different continents and has 4 diferent border countries, stalingrad army only has 3 borders and borders only 2 continents. I would think about flip flopping the bonuses, make von Bock Army worth 5 and Stalingrad worth 4.

For now bonuses stay like now. I tell you that these not my bonuses, i give people open hands to give me hese opinion, and i apply what Marvadin tell, and some people agree with these(i will go back and give you ful report if you want) where you been when this hepend?

by **Fitz69** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:02 am

All looks good to me!

by **Wisse** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:00 pm

thnx

but bluereaper gets all the credits for my avatar because its his

by **KEYOGI** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:01 pm

There's no need to put everything to vote.

Firstly I see no reason why a name should have to fit completely within its territory. Try swapping the name and shadow in Demyansk. The name and shadow in Narva could go up a little bit. The rest are fine.

I think a lot of the numbers look out horizontally, but I give up trying to help. I offer advice and all I do is get ignored or abused for doing so. This will be my last post in this thread. I think those borders should really be looked at, but do whatever the hell you want with the numbers, nobody seems to care. I don't understand why you've got special privelages.
:roll:

by **Qwert** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:28 pm

You trying to help.
When Bedplay have problems with image size first i tell hem that image must be 600x350 and he dont know how then a take bedplay image and resize and then post image can she see.
I see that numbers look wery good and if you want to show me where numbers dont look good then show me visual like i do when try to help bedplay in korea map.

by **Teya** on Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:33 pm

I know qwert is going to think we are just prolonging the process but I agree with keyogi.
Everyone says 20's cant be centered but in Starlingrad it looks to me as if its the most centered. All the others seem quite a bit out horizontally as keyogi also said.
1 good thing is the ones that look out seem they are all out in the same direction now.

WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

Who is online