Moderator: Community Team
wicked wrote:someone talk some sense into that man!
strike wolf wrote:wicked wrote:someone talk some sense into that man!
Yeah, it's only a matter of time before he permanently injures his shoulder or something else.
Sargentgeneral wrote:ah and so it begins...
i will start of with, i hate brett farve! (See location if confused) I think he has no talent right now and is the worst quarterback in the league. All he ever does is complain about injuries that other QBs dont ever talk about but still have, and then try to make himself sound like a hero when he plays. Saying that...I voted that this is GOOD news.
I voted that its good news because my favorite thing to do is make fun of him. Since he is sooo bad, i love watching him struggle through a season with no hope of success. His new strategy of "lets see how high i can throw the ball and see if my player can catch it."
I am very much going to enjoy watching brett farve suck it up on one of the worst teams in the nfl! (im getting giddy just thinking about it!)
And I am very much ready to see the Vikings actually be the worst team in the NFL again
btw, the Packers swept the biqueens last year.
Sargentgeneral wrote:And I am very much ready to see the Vikings actually be the worst team in the NFL again
btw, the Packers swept the biqueens last year.
Ha, just what i expected. even from a die hard packer fan, he made no attempt to even defend Farve! Goes to show even Green bay knows that all they are getting is a player that should have retired 4 years ago! ( but im glad he is coming back! He sucks too much to want him to quit.)
You are going to have to wait a long time before you see the Vikings at the bottom because they will have to wait for the packers to get rid of brett because until they do they will be the worst team in football! (Yes, even worse than the lions and that is saying a lot!)
Sargentgeneral wrote:And I am very much ready to see the Vikings actually be the worst team in the NFL again
btw, the Packers swept the biqueens last year.
Ha, just what i expected. even from a die hard packer fan, he made no attempt to even defend Farve! Goes to show even Green bay knows that all they are getting is a player that should have retired 4 years ago! ( but im glad he is coming back! He sucks too much to want him to quit.)
You are going to have to wait a long time before you see the Vikings at the bottom because they will have to wait for the packers to get rid of brett because until they do they will be the worst team in football! (Yes, even worse than the lions and that is saying a lot!)
sargentgeneral wrote:All he ever does is complain about injuries that other QBs dont ever talk about but still have, and then try to make himself sound like a hero when he plays
sargentgeneral wrote:His new strategy of "lets see how high i can throw the ball and see if my player can catch it."
sargentgeneral wrote:You are going to have to wait a long time before you see the Vikings at the bottom because they will have to wait for the packers to get rid of brett because until they do they will be the worst team in football! (Yes, even worse than the lions and that is saying a lot!)
sargentgeneral wrote:I have to add that Farve will virtually do anything for himself. He is very selfish which is another reason why i hate him.
sargentgeneral wrote:Also, i truly enjoy writing my dominating counter points. Dont pull this its to easy crap, because you know that if you write something, then i will comeback with something more believable and true, and then you will hurt yourself trying to think of a comback...
First of all, the Vikings didn't rebound nicely. And 6-10 isn't a decent season in any league. They're record got worse from last year to this year. And they are once again 7 in the top ten of the worst teams in the NFL, and are getting worse.
You act as if the loss of their "star" quarterback hurt them last year, but then you say it was a step forward for him to leave. Then the Vikings release their top 3 recievers, Koren Robinson, Nate Burlesson, and Marcus Robinson, leaving Troy Williamson and Bethel Johnson as their starters??? That could only hurt them and left them with their only offensive star being their left guard, and even he performed way under par compaired to what the Vikings are paying him.
Then they go and release their defensive coordinator, who was suppose to establish a new tampa 2 defense, and only succeeded at having one of the worst secondaries in the league. And Brad Childress is afraid to address issues to the team and public because he is afraid for some reason. When asked in an interview about the teams poor performance, Childress says, "we need to call better plays." NO FUCKEN SHIT.
The Packers on the other hand doubled their wins, and finished a half a game out of the playoffs, with 3 rookie o-lineman, an entirely new coaching staff, with only one notable reciever. Not to mention that they are the youngest team in the league. Aaron Rodgers has already proven that he can't start in the NFL yet, and several years on the bench can't ever hurt, ask Tony Romo, Matt Hasslebeck, Steve Young, and Philip Rivers.
Brett is their only option at QB. He is a team mentor, something a young team should have. And if Favre were released, there are at least 10 teams off the top of my head that would sign him in a heart beat, and the Vikings are one of them.
By refusing to retire, Favre gives the team a chance to compete next year. I know that he has lost a step or two since his prime, but he is also better than half the starting quarterbacks in the league.
If Rodgers had started last year, like i'm sure you, and most other non-Packer fans called for, do you think they would have been better than their 4-12 record? Impossable. They for sure would have been 1-15, beating only the Saints because of their own follies. Throwing a young QB like himself into the fire like that would shatter his confidense and he would never be the same.
The Packers will be better than the Vikings and Lions next year, and you can quote me on that. And anyone who thinks otherwise has blind faith for whatever lackluster team they like, or is simply retarded. Any way you put it, the Packers a way better off having Favre return. case closed
Which asshole are you pulling this shit out of? Yours or Lord Canti's.
This means a lot coming from someone who spells his own name wrong.
Sargentgeneral wrote:ah, i was waiting for this...now lets have some fun.
I will start off with i really enjoyed reading what you wrote. Some of my favorite books are fiction, so those statements were really fun!First of all, the Vikings didn't rebound nicely. And 6-10 isn't a decent season in any league. They're record got worse from last year to this year. And they are once again 7 in the top ten of the worst teams in the NFL, and are getting worse.
The biggest problem we had this year was brad johnson. With TJ next year, we will not do nearly as bad. Also, any football fan would know that when our record was 6-8, we were rooting to lose so we could get a good draft pick dumb shit! now lets move on.
sargentgeneral wrote:You act as if the loss of their "star" quarterback hurt them last year, but then you say it was a step forward for him to leave. Then the Vikings release their top 3 recievers, Koren Robinson, Nate Burlesson, and Marcus Robinson, leaving Troy Williamson and Bethel Johnson as their starters??? That could only hurt them and left them with their only offensive star being their left guard, and even he performed way under par compaired to what the Vikings are paying him.
Leaving donte was really important because we would never had moved anywhere with him. now we get a fresh start. lets see here, Koren Robinson was given a second chance for his drug abuse and he was still at his antics so we threw him to the curb. Nobody is stupid enough to keep a player like tha...o wait, the packers picked him up, i forgot. Marcus Robinson i always thought was overrated, and we got rid of Burlesson so that we could pick up possibly the best offensive linemen in the game. Yeah you are right, Hutch played way below par, pro bowl is not nearly good enough! (duh!)
sargentgeneral wrote:Then they go and release their defensive coordinator, who was suppose to establish a new tampa 2 defense, and only succeeded at having one of the worst secondaries in the league. And Brad Childress is afraid to address issues to the team and public because he is afraid for some reason. When asked in an interview about the teams poor performance, Childress says, "we need to call better plays." NO FUCKEN SHIT.
First of all, the defensive coordinator part doesn't make sense for your point you are trying (and failing) to make. And for Brad's interview, what else should he say? We cant all be like Brett and just blame other people for our problems.
sargentgeneral wrote:The Packers on the other hand doubled their wins, and finished a half a game out of the playoffs, with 3 rookie o-lineman, an entirely new coaching staff, with only one notable reciever. Not to mention that they are the youngest team in the league. Aaron Rodgers has already proven that he can't start in the NFL yet, and several years on the bench can't ever hurt, ask Tony Romo, Matt Hasslebeck, Steve Young, and Philip Rivers.
The one notable receiver that made Brett look better than he is, yeah that one.
sargentgeneral wrote:WTF!!! How in the hell can you even compare Rodgers to any of those guys especially Steve Young!!!??! (btw, if you want to mention benched starters why not mention brady? Yeah, you really know football if you leave him out! man, you are really fun to make fun of!)
sargentgeneral wrote:Brett is their only option at QB. He is a team mentor, something a young team should have. And if Favre were released, there are at least 10 teams off the top of my head that would sign him in a heart beat, and the Vikings are one of them.
By refusing to retire, Favre gives the team a chance to compete next year. I know that he has lost a step or two since his prime, but he is also better than half the starting quarterbacks in the league.
HAHAHAHAHA!!! man, you really have your head in the clouds. The Vikings would not take Farve ever! if you think that then you know nothing about rivalries. And when you said he is better than half the quarterbacks in the league...man. We are talking about the N-F-L! Brett is near the very bottom of the barrel. He is better then half the quarterbacks in the league, its just the CFL. (ouch!)
sargentgeneral wrote:If Rodgers had started last year, like i'm sure you, and most other non-Packer fans called for, do you think they would have been better than their 4-12 record? Impossable. They for sure would have been 1-15, beating only the Saints because of their own follies. Throwing a young QB like himself into the fire like that would shatter his confidense and he would never be the same.
funny how you were comparing him to romo, young, hasslebeck, and rivers earlier. seems to be contradicting.
sargengeneral wrote:The Packers will be better than the Vikings and Lions next year, and you can quote me on that. And anyone who thinks otherwise has blind faith for whatever lackluster team they like, or is simply retarded. Any way you put it, the Packers a way better off having Favre return. case closed
Blind faith for whaterver lackluster team they like...hmmmmm, sounds like you and your terrible packers. and Farve still sucks no matter how you try and make him out to be. I just watch PTI today and they said the same thing so dont worry about kiddo, he still sucks hard.
sargentgeneral wrote:Which asshole are you pulling this shit out of? Yours or Lord Canti's.
HA! this isnt even a comeback! you just tried to insult me by using vulgar language to try and intimidate me. you did not do anything to counter my points so, in turn, you must not know what to say...so i am correct. Thank you for showing me that you know it is true and cant think of anything to say to defend yourself.
sargentgeneral wrote:This means a lot coming from someone who spells his own name wrong.
ok, first of all, that comeback doesnt make any sense at all. what does that have to do with anything? sargent is my name dumbass! I know how to spell sergeant!
No, with T-Jack starting, you won't have a chance. He proved nothing last year. NOTHING. Why would you cheer for your team to loose when you were still in playoff contention??? Sounds like you're the dumbshit.
The Packers picked up k-rob on a win win situation. He signed for the player minimum with a 2 year deal and no bonus. If he acted up he could just leave with no cap penalties. The vikings on the other hand lost big when he fucked up. They actually paid him starting wages to be a kick returner, and lost big cap money when they cut him.
If you knew anything about the probowl, you would know it is just a popularity contest. Take for instance Vince Young, he's going this year, even though he had the worst completion percent, and the 2nd worst QB rating. Mike Vanderjagt had the most votes out of kickers, and he doesn't even play for a team anymore!!!
The defensive coordinator part did make sense because I was talking about the Vikings sucking again this year. Which they in fact did. And you don't even know what a Tampa-2 defense is, do you? And atleast provide examples for when you say that Brett is selfish, complains about injuries, and blames people for his problems. But I know you won't cuz you're a fag.
I left Brady out because all of the aformention players were drafted to start, including Rodgers. Brady was drafted to fill a roster spot. And try and find where I said that Rodgers was as good as Steve Young. "you are really fun to make fun of!"
To name half the starters: (Is farve better than?)
J.P. Losman (no)
Joey Harrington (no)
Jeff Garcia (no)
Jason Campbell (yes)
Mark Burnell (no)
Rex Grossman (no)
Jon Kitna (no)
Charlie Frye (yes)
Traveris Jackson (hasnt played enough to tell)
Brad Johnson (yes)
Ben Rothlesberger (not even close)
Byron Leftwitch (not even close)
Chris Simms (no)
Vince Young (no)
Matt Leinart (no)
Alex Smith (no)
Andrew Walter (yes)
David Carr (no)
Jay Cutler (no)
examples???
Are you trying to say that sargent is you're real name? If so, nuff said kid.
sargentgeneral wrote:And if the pro bowl is such a popularity contest, why is Farve absent from the roster? If he is as good as you say he is, and it is only a popularity contest, technically he should be at the top of the list, but he is not on it.
sargentgeneral wrote:TJ showed what he could do with such little playing time. he is already more athletic than farve could ever hope to be. Plus, knowing how the playoffs work, the vikings really had no chance to be in the playoffs at the point so you are the dumbshit.
sargentgeneral wrote:Cover 2 defense, not a tampa 2. you play too much madden.
sargentgeneral wrote:You want examples for farve, thumb injury, every time he gets a minor injury, any press conference, any part of his life at any moment!
sargentgeneral wrote:Where did i say you said Rogers was as good as Young? I just said there was no way to compare them. dont put words into my mouth.
sargentgeneral wrote:How in the hell can you even compare Rodgers to any of those guys especially Steve Young!!!??!
cutesargentgeneral wrote: but old enough to know not to post my age on a website!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users