1756273597
1756273597 Conquer Club • View topic - pre-game round
Conquer Club

pre-game round

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Do you support an extra turn in the beginning for deployment?

Yes
8
57%
No
6
43%
I don't care
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 14

pre-game round

Postby slowreactor on Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:38 am

Concise description:
  • to allow a pre-game round where people can deploy their extra troops on the territories they already own, just like in real Risk.

Specifics:
  • So far, the only option for troop deployment when the game begins is 3 on every territory that you own. What the pre-game round would do is to take the 2 extra troops off of every territory and allow the players to deploy those troops on the territories they already own, which will make it very similar to actual Risk. I am not asking for a complete change, just for the option of doing this or the original drops when the player creates the game.
  • However, this will not affect they way that territories are distributed in the beginning.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • It will make it more similar to Risk
  • Decrease frustration on chained and adjacent games, esp. on large maps
  • Quite a few other sites do it already
Last edited by slowreactor on Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby Rabid bunnies on Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:15 am

I actually wonder if the stagnate and random dispersal of 3s is a hidden blessing. We know quite a bit about how the dice and drops are blamed quite often. I wonder about games where the frustration geared towards CC's drop is geared towards other players before the game even starts.

Player A) Deploys on East Australia
Player B) Deploys on Argentina
Player C) deploys on Northern Europe

Player A) Deploys on West Australia
Player B) Deploys on Peru (Player B now realizes A is going to take aussie unopposed, this isn't good for B because SA is much tougher to defend.)
Player C) Deploys on Scandinavia

Player A) Deploys on New Guinea
Player B) Deploys on Indonesia to interrupt Player A.
Player C) Deploys on Great Britain

All of a sudden player A takes offense and deploys on Brazil to spitefully (and tactically) block off SA's bonus.

The 2 will likely begin exchanging words accusing each other of being multis with player 3 who is taking Europe so easily.

Whenever we tried to play non-random dispersal... the player taking Europe was rarely interrupted, everyone was waiting on everyone else to interrupt Europe without wanting to commit themselves to the task of being Europe-hopeful's victim.

The same goes with deciding to place extra men before the game begins... certain people will take exceptional offense to having otherwise easily attainable bonuses stolen from them before round 1.

As bad as CC's drops can be blamed... when it comes to intentional play of others before the game starts... you would see a huge spike in the ammount of "sabotage" claims.

Jasmine
User avatar
Lieutenant Rabid bunnies
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:07 am

Re: pre-game round

Postby slowreactor on Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:49 am

A couple of things:

First of all, I am still an advocate of random drops. Second of all, if it was implemented, it would be an OPTION to make the game that way, not a pre-made decision. Besides, actual risk is not played by putting 3 on each territory. This would appeal more to hardcore purist fans of Risk.

Besides, if you are a good player, you will not leave someone completely unattended to specifically go after another player, unless you are teaming up.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby Thezzaruz on Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:55 am

Do you envisage one single round where we, in some sort of freestyle style, put down our armies when and where we see fit or do you want a structured turn-by-turn way of doing it??? And how much time do you intend to allow for this???

Also this has been suggested before and put onto the "to-do" list as "pending" but that thread is gone for some reason.
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.

Re: pre-game round

Postby slowreactor on Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:16 am

it would be just like a round. In freestyle, it would be a freestyle turn. In sequential, it would be a sequential turn. The time limit would be probably 24 hours, just like normal. If you time out during the pre-game round, the computer would automatically place 3's on everything you have, to prevent you from going out too early.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby Thezzaruz on Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:45 am

slowreactor wrote:it would be just like a round. In freestyle, it would be a freestyle turn. In sequential, it would be a sequential turn. The time limit would be probably 24 hours, just like normal. If you time out during the pre-game round, the computer would automatically place 3's on everything you have, to prevent you from going out too early.


But only one round??? Meaning it is nothing at all like RISK. Then what do we gain???
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.

Re: pre-game round

Postby slowreactor on Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:01 am

we can't actually make it like risk, since there will be likely 50 or more rounds just for deploying, even more on bigger maps. One turn would still allow the essence of the game to come through w/o bogging down players with a game that lasts months.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby wolfpack0530 on Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:10 pm

to be fair, there would have to be 2 deployment rounds, as the last person to deploy has the advantage. First deployment round, each player deploys half of their troups as they see fit, and the other players do it also sequentially. in freestyle, same thing goes, deploy half of your troups (no more , no less).

Second deployment round, everyone deploys the rest of their troups. There will still be an advantage to going last, however this may be mitigated by that person taking their turn last once the game starts.
Captain wolfpack0530
 
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 am
Location: Shady Thickets, where it is warm and moist

Re: pre-game round

Postby pimphawks70 on Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:16 pm

slowreactor wrote:Concise description:
  • just like in real Risk.

[*] will make it very similar to actual Risk. [/list]

[*]It will make it more similar to Risk



RISK is a registered trademark of Hasbro Inc. Conquer Club is not associated with RISK or Hasbro in any way.

:o :o :o
Image
User avatar
Brigadier pimphawks70
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:21 am

Re: pre-game round

Postby Thezzaruz on Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:55 pm

pimphawks70 wrote:RISK is a registered trademark of Hasbro Inc. Conquer Club is not associated with RISK or Hasbro in any way.


Completely irrelevant though as the game rules isn't illegal to copy, especially one as common amongst strategy games as the "take turns to deploy".
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.

Re: pre-game round deployment

Postby slowreactor on Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:16 am

bump

Clarified a bit more on title.

Added poll.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby Martin Ronne on Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:17 pm

I would like to control were my troops go.
User avatar
Major Martin Ronne
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Behind you.

Re: pre-game round

Postby wolfpack0530 on Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:37 pm

wolfpack0530 wrote:to be fair, there would have to be 2 deployment rounds, as the last person to deploy has the advantage. First deployment round, each player deploys half of their troups as they see fit, and the other players do it also sequentially. in freestyle, same thing goes, deploy half of your troups (no more , no less).

Second deployment round, everyone deploys the rest of their troups. There will still be an advantage to going last, however this may be mitigated by that person taking their turn last once the game starts.




I think this guy said it best ;)
Captain wolfpack0530
 
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 am
Location: Shady Thickets, where it is warm and moist

Re: pre-game round

Postby slowreactor on Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:30 pm

Robinette wrote:I'm okay with the current Classic Art map...

although it would be nice if someone wrote a greasemonkey script that would display different names.
It could be anything, as long as you could instantly identify the place from the name.

But if there was to be a change, i would prefer to see the starting deployment gameplay change.
Try playing a real game of RISK with your friends and see how different it is placing your armies vs CC's autodeployment of 3 per territory. The strategy unfolds entirely differently. lol... this is what our confident CC players first discovered when they played at the International RISK Tournament.


Perfect, perfect, perfect. And I found this on the GD forum, lol.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: pre-game round

Postby max is gr8 on Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:43 pm

this has been done right? So shouldn't this be done and moved?
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
User avatar
Corporal max is gr8
 
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
Location: In a big ball of light sent from the future


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users