Moderator: Community Team
Iliad wrote:I throw in a joke vote against pmc, and suddenly we all have a serious discussion vs him.
The naming of minor characters is kinda suspicious.
Speculation often is used by Mafia. Mafia want to reveal nothing but look like they are creating discussion. They simply drop the number of Mafia they "think" there are, careful to sound unsure. Tada it looks like they are contributing, where actually the discussion has not been pushed forward at all. So pmc looks slightly suspicious but I'm not voting him yet, and since my vote was a joke and the game is past the joke day 1 votes into serious discussion I will unvote
Iliad wrote:I throw in a joke vote against pmc, and suddenly we all have a serious discussion vs him.
The naming of minor characters is kinda suspicious.
Speculation often is used by Mafia. Mafia want to reveal nothing but look like they are creating discussion. They simply drop the number of Mafia they "think" there are, careful to sound unsure. Tada it looks like they are contributing, where actually the discussion has not been pushed forward at all. So pmc looks slightly suspicious but I'm not voting him yet, and since my vote was a joke and the game is past the joke day 1 votes into serious discussion I will unvote
Suspect101 wrote:Ok:
1) You think that his naming of minor characters is suspicious.
2) He speculated, and you say that speculation is often used by mafia.
3) He has revealed nothing, but created discussion, which you say mafia do.
4) He said how many mafia he "thinks" there are, carefully to sound unsure.
5) Not to mention that you have the fact that he OMGUS voted right after I called him out.
pmchugh wrote:
I disagee with 1, by naming minor characters I was making you more aware of fake claims, how is that suspicious.
pmchugh wrote:2 and 4 I knew people would say but still di it anyway.
pmchugh wrote:
As for 3 yes I have created discussion that is useful for the game, care to deny that?
pmchugh wrote:
And number 5, it was A JOKE vote. Hardly a serious OMGUS.
pmchugh wrote:
Scum Tells aren't 100% look at the context first.
suspect wrote:You knew they were scum tells, and you did them anyways? Misleading people is not very town like. If you were town why would you do things that you knew were scummy?
suspect wrote:pmchugh wrote:
And number 5, it was A JOKE vote. Hardly a serious OMGUS.
Ofcourse you would claim it as a joke, since you got no bandwagon going. If you did I doubt you would be calling it a joke.
pmchugh wrote:I figured I would get a few votes for it, by SCUM!
unvote vote suspect
suspect wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Scum Tells aren't 100% look at the context first.
I am.
pmchugh wrote:scum are more careful than town, learn that.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Hmmm...karelpietertje has been pretty quiet so far this game.
AceArtemis wrote:Unvote to withdraw my random vote.
As for pmc's bandwagon, there's way too much speculation going on. Pmc could just be someone who knows the theme well and wants to guess the setup, or he could be mafia trying to act helpful. There's no knowing which. I don't like this bandwagon on pmc, though, because this speculation is giving the town information, such as what claims are likely to be fake.pmchugh wrote:scum are more careful than town, learn that.
From my experience being scum, this is very true. I am a lot more careful when I am scum than when I am town.
karelpietertje wrote:so i thought that after 36 hours day 1 would end... why hasn't it?
karelpietertje wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:Hmmm...karelpietertje has been pretty quiet so far this game.
yes i was quiet because i didnt know quite what to say... this is all very confusing to me
that is also why i say: unvote
so i thought that after 36 hours day 1 would end... why hasn't it?
of course i dont want it to end... i have most votes at the moment
so can anybody explain to me why they voted me that much? I mean, im still learning too, i want to know what to do about this.
because I never liked the thought of having nothing to stand on when I have a rope tied around my neck
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I dont agree with Karel's reasoning for unvoting PMC. He uses his naivety to the game as an excuse to unvote. I don't understand this game any more than he does and Suspect's analysis is making want to vote for PMC more and more, not the other way around. The only reason he could have for unvoting (as far as I can tell) is to protect another mafia member. What do some of you veterans think?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I dont agree with Karel's reasoning for unvoting PMC. He uses his naivety to the game as an excuse to unvote. I don't understand this game any more than he does and Suspect's analysis is making want to vote for PMC more and more, not the other way around. The only reason he could have for unvoting (as far as I can tell) is to protect another mafia member. What do some of you veterans think?
AceArtemis wrote:From my experience being scum, this is very true. I am a lot more careful when I am scum than when I am town.
Hologram wrote:I'm not going to comment on your rationale as it has both good and bad parts to it, but I will tell you not to let anyone's analysis be your sole basis for anything, because the mafia works by trying to influence the town to vote in their favor, usually by making compelling, but untrue arguments. Make your own analysis before making any decisions.
spiesr wrote:The only reason to unvote is to protect a scum buddy?
No, you can also unvote because you are no longer as sure that that person is scum...
karelpietertje wrote:this is exactly what scum would say
youre trying to pretend that you are now good, but fact is: once a scum, forever a scum. (this applies only for you though... i bet everybody has been scum at some poin)
vote AceArtemis
pmchugh wrote:Urg mafia is so frustrating these days, people look at slightly scummy behaviour and go well he must be scum! No scum are more careful than town, learn that.
suspect wrote:You knew they were scum tells, and you did them anyways? Misleading people is not very town like. If you were town why would you do things that you knew were scummy?
pmchugh wrote:They are not major tells, I expected to get a few votes and that would be it, I even said this. I am not misleading townies I am fishing for reaction. Reaction is a great thing and that is what I mean by creating conversation that is useful not putting myself in the spotlight.
pmchugh wrote:suspect wrote:pmchugh wrote:
And number 5, it was A JOKE vote. Hardly a serious OMGUS.
Ofcourse you would claim it as a joke, since you got no bandwagon going. If you did I doubt you would be calling it a joke.pmchugh wrote:I figured I would get a few votes for it, by SCUM!
unvote vote suspect
This vote is not serious, otherwise I would have said:
"I was acting slightly scummy in order to find scum jumping on the first townie they could find, and suspect clearly fits that. Most people are joking about but suspect is taking this way too seriously showing that he is eager to lynch the first townie he can."
Or something similar, I certainly wouldn't be expecting anyone to jump on a wagon such as what I actually wrote but the above statement may have pulled some votes. I know how to start BW's better than that, and the fact you are pointing to this vote as serious shows desperation.
pmchugh wrote:suspect wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Scum Tells aren't 100% look at the context first.
I am.
No you think you are.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:BLABLABLABLABLABLABLA...PMC looks scummy... BLABLABLABLA...karel is acting weird, lets vote on him.... BLABLABLABLABLABLAkarelp seems to be voting for a random reason
It is day 1. We have nothing to go on. If you are the person acting scummy, even a little bit, you will get the votes and the questions thrown your way.
spiesr wrote:So, are pmc and Suspect scum buddies having an angry, but ultimately futile, argument on day 1 to distance themselves from each other?
Thezzaruz wrote:First off, UnVote. It was never serious anyhow.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users