Snorri1234 wrote:Suspect101 wrote:reasons being that nag claimed drench was "cleared in his book", I quoted the wording in my other posts.
That's not the same as "backing someone a few times". Sure, I think it's poorly chosen as it wasn't a very convincing role-claim, but that is hardly a good reason to call for an investigation. (Particularly since, if there is any investigating role left, you and / are also suspicious and I would say with a far better reason.)
Not only did nag not back him drench at all, rather once nag seemed satisfied with drench's claim. Remember drench had most of us fooled at that point, so don't say you just jumped on a an obvious scum, he did not back him a few times but rather "once"
And not only that, but-YOU HAVE NO OTHER POSTS. Your posts are-you being replaced and promising to re-read, you jumping on drench's wagon and throwing an accusation and nag and then one more saying that nag backed drench.
People do we really need more proof?
Let's see-
Militant doesn't post at all and goes inactive. Suspect "replaces" him and lurks masterfully. Not only that but he votes for an "obvious scum" jumping on a wagon. How convenient that he distances himself away from the mafia with that vote. Remember that at that point drench is not "obvious scum". Drench was suspicious but it only became obvious the next day after the watcher caught him. And now suspect is continually lying and twisting the truth. Apparently nag unvoting after drench came up with a fakeclaim that fooled us all, is backing him a few times. Nag backed him up a few times in that one post. Obviously
And apparently he explained it in his other posts. He only began posting again after I accused him. Fancy that-didn't post at all until threw in a vote on a wagon, and an accusation, and didn't post at all until he suddenly started posting after accusations flew against him.
What does that mean if a player doesn't post but suddenly starts once there are accusation against him-that's right that he was checking the thread but not posting. Lurking.
Bandwagoning, lying, lurking suspect has them all.
Now about nag.
Drench wrote:Well. Since there's absolutely no way for me to defend myself, and I'm screwed anyway, allow me to truly claim.
I'm Krug and Dr. Van Kruglor (same person). That part was true. I am a ...well...I'll let MM tell you. But, unfortunately for a faction, I was the only way for that faction to have a mole in another faction and bring down said faction. You've just wasted it. I hope you're happy. Nyeh. I enjoyed playing, and good luck to the faction that I'm part of. Even though I was trying to kill said faction, but hell. Good luck anyways.
(Also, BAH.)
Drench here implies that there is more than one faction, ie more than one mafia. That very well may be the case-I'll check the scenes for different roles. Maybe suspect is another usurper, naively trying to throw down nag. Suspect's accusation of nag does seem to be quite trying and pushy and trying to appear nonchalant.
I'll look for evidence of multiple mafia factions and which ones are they.
Meanwhile lynch the lying lurker.