WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

by **Guiscard** on Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:01 pm

I'd go for 4, but you can't really make out the hammer and sickle in most of them.

by **Qwert** on Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:04 pm

you want too remowe out hammer and sickle ?
Its see like you dont look previos update

by **bleka** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:14 am

Halo Vojvodina, pa stavljaj vise tu mapu unutra, jebo te Agim Ceku :lol:

.
Cuj imal nesto od te mape o Ex-Yu, ili jos bolje Titovi Partizani, Neretva, Sutjeska,...

by **Qwert** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:25 pm

i waith answer

by **Guiscard** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:53 pm

Don't really have an opinion as to whether to remove it, just thought I;d point out the fact that it can't be made out in my favorite font. Maybe it would be better to use a gradient instead, yellow in the centre to red outside. Can we see some on the map?

by **Qwert** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:08 pm

its original background, and its better for me to put in these way to show more diferent style, instead to upload 10 times maps.

by **Teya** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:11 pm

At some point, we will need to see it on the map so we can see if it fits with the rest of the map.

by **Despot** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:14 pm

itis good map

by **Qwert** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:00 pm

ok here new update,i think that title look wery nice and red background dont have big influence on title, and i put army flags, do you like these.

by **Guiscard** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:03 pm

Title itself is fine but the shadows are going the wrong way compared to the ones in the legend. Lose the flags though. other than that not much more needs doing that I can see. Good work Qwert.

by **Teya** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:04 pm

The title looks good. Im not sure about the shadow and I dont like the flags.
The german army bonuses look much better as well.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:30 pm

Hmm I like the flags! It's the contrast between the red background and the red title that is not convincing me.

by **Marvaddin** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:34 pm

Yep, try it with title option 1

I think it will be better.

by **Guiscard** on Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:25 pm

Its not the flags so much but the fact they look like clip-art plonked on top ather than an integral part of the map.

by **Qwert** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:13 am

guiscard the shadows going in right direction,gray up and black down and these going in all letters.
i think that flag now look good.
If you dont like flag just say and i remove from map.

Marvadin i put version 1

by **KEYOGI** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:39 am

I'm not a huge fan of the flags, but I don't mind them being there. I think there does need to be something there though, maybe the flags is the best option.

Some very minor details that I think should be considered:
- Army shadows may be too dark in some continents, but you could probably leave that until we've seen numbers on the map to make sure.
- The arrows could probably be made smaller, giving you more room for text and army shadows in each territory.
- Some territory names and/or shadows are touching borders. Slightly adjusting those borders would help improve the look of the map.

Keep up the good work.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:24 am

Perhaps adding a specific background box for the title and flags might help to create contrast as the title and background are both red. Just an idea...

by **Marvaddin** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:36 am

qwert wrote:

I was talking about this #1, because its too red over the red, lol :wink:

by **Qwert** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 pm

Arrows dont have influence on names size,if you can see all depend of terittory of demyansk, Novgorod,Voronez, Novorosyjsk,and if i these terittory change then all terittory must change what will bee wery big problem.
I see all names and only Novgorod tuch others terittory,but i think that these not a problem.Leningrad Stalingrad and Moscow Must tuch others lines becouse its big.

ruben i work something in these idea, and title in box dont look good.

I give first 10 option for Text, size, color and style Title and people say no7,then i give 10 diferent style of these title, i realy can not put 100 diferent style of these title, and i belive that look wery good, why you dont agree with me.

Marvadin i put these first then people say dont good then i put 10 diferent and people say 7,soory but first you must have mayority to change these if you understand me.

by **Qwert** on Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:31 pm

by **bleka** on Sun Jan 21, 2007 4:51 am

Bloody hell, can you post it, already !!!!!!!!! :twisted:

You behave like 12 years old girls: yes;no; maybe. LEt us play then we will improve it along the way (Viva improvisation).

by **Qwert** on Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:01 am

bleka wrote
Bloody hell, can you post it, already !!!!!!!!!
You behave like 12 years old girls: yes;no; maybe. LEt us play then we will improve it along the way (Viva improvisation).

You dont understand how these map foundry work.
Its not depend of me,when will this map be finish.
When people say that my map fulfil all needs requirements, and when Andy say also too, then maps go to final forge and finish its close.

by **nyg5680** on Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:23 am

i think it is comin along very well

by **qeee1** on Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:47 pm

I think no flags is better than flags. The blank space will look fine imo.

by **Qwert** on Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:25 pm

Keyoky you right its to dark too se blue army number, i put these army circle and i think that look good.

WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

Re: WWII EASTERN FRONT

Who is online