Conquer Club

IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Game Over)

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Sierra_Leon on Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:37 am

I think we can assume MM blocked farside last night.
Image
User avatar
Major Sierra_Leon
 
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby farside22 on Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:37 am

Before I claim I would like to know who Nate tageted last night. It will make a difference I believe.
User avatar
New Recruit farside22
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Natewolfman on Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:37 am

I was rollblocked last night
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Natewolfman
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: omaha, NE

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby farside22 on Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:38 am

@Drench did you note the flavor of the kills as day 1 a person was shot and day 2 a person was stabbed. Do you believe there is a difference or just mod flavoring?
User avatar
New Recruit farside22
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby farside22 on Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:40 am

Hmmm this makes things interesting. 1 kill again last night.
I will tell you that last night I jailed Ace. I was suspicious of the fact that he did not vote derf day 1.
So either Ace or Nate in my view is either mafia or SK at this point.
User avatar
New Recruit farside22
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby animorpherv1 on Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:36 pm

<not needed> Of course, i had no action.

That's a good thing, considering my dad took it all of 2 days ago.
User avatar
Cook animorpherv1
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: In your mind, messing with your thoughts

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby ace1217 on Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:49 pm

farside22 wrote:Hmmm this makes things interesting. 1 kill again last night.
I will tell you that last night I jailed Ace. I was suspicious of the fact that he did not vote derf day 1.
So either Ace or Nate in my view is either mafia or SK at this point.

There is a third option: you are the corrupted one here. Although I must admit that I was roleblocked last night, but you may have not killed last night.
Cadet ace1217
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:00 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Drench on Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:39 pm

edit
Last edited by Drench on Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cook Drench
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:02 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Natewolfman on Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:45 pm

Drench wrote:To the matter of 1 kill per night...it is obvious that an anti-town faction has been roleblocked each night. The only two people that can do that (now) is the Jailkeeper and the Roleblocker. Look at night one. Nate and MM was roleblocked. Notice how MM is dead and town. This leaves one person. By no means conclusive, but something to think about. HOWEVER. If we look at the flavor (and we are going into very murky territory here that is by no means true), we can assume that the SK was blocked N1. One player is the SK. One player is unknown and roleblocked on N1. However, it is also possible Nate is scum. 50/50 chance to be blocked then if he is, but that is certainly possible.

And now for night 2. Nate and Ace were roleblocked. Nate is already on the list N1, so the flavor means nothing. Ace was also revealed as being roleblocked. This means that one of Ace and Nate are innocent, as there was only one blocked scum. Look above, where Nate comes under suspicion. At this stage, I'm willing to bet that Nate is scum and Ace is town.

Vote: Nate. L-3 people. Thoughts?

assumeing everything you say here is true, and it all sounds very nice and flashy (perhaps a little too flashy for my tastes...) ace is scum, though you painted a huge target on my back, and will likelly end up getting lynched because of it. You will see that I am town, and if after that ace ends up being town, be sure to look at Drench (this addressed to the rest of the townies)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Natewolfman
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: omaha, NE

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Drench on Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:29 pm

edit
Last edited by Drench on Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cook Drench
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:02 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Natewolfman on Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:38 pm

Drench wrote:
Natewolfman wrote:
Drench wrote:To the matter of 1 kill per night...it is obvious that an anti-town faction has been roleblocked each night. The only two people that can do that (now) is the Jailkeeper and the Roleblocker. Look at night one. Nate and MM was roleblocked. Notice how MM is dead and town. This leaves one person. By no means conclusive, but something to think about. HOWEVER. If we look at the flavor (and we are going into very murky territory here that is by no means true), we can assume that the SK was blocked N1. One player is the SK. One player is unknown and roleblocked on N1. However, it is also possible Nate is scum. 50/50 chance to be blocked then if he is, but that is certainly possible.

And now for night 2. Nate and Ace were roleblocked. Nate is already on the list N1, so the flavor means nothing. Ace was also revealed as being roleblocked. This means that one of Ace and Nate are innocent, as there was only one blocked scum. Look above, where Nate comes under suspicion. At this stage, I'm willing to bet that Nate is scum and Ace is town.

Vote: Nate. L-3 people. Thoughts?

assumeing everything you say here is true, and it all sounds very nice and flashy (perhaps a little too flashy for my tastes...) ace is scum, though you painted a huge target on my back, and will likelly end up getting lynched because of it. You will see that I am town, and if after that ace ends up being town, be sure to look at Drench (this addressed to the rest of the townies)


Ex-ca-huse-me?

assumeing everything you say here is true, and it all sounds very nice and flashy (perhaps a little too flashy for my tastes...)


Elaborate please. You use alot of words and alot of exact references is all I mean ;)

ace is scum, though you painted a huge target on my back, and will likelly end up getting lynched because of it.


One question:

Why is Ace scum in your opinion excluding my line of reasoning? because I know I am not, therefor if your resoning is correct then he must be scum, no?

You will see that I am town, and if after that ace ends up being town,


I don't know about you, but I think this is leaning to an Appeal (Emotion?). And it is impossible for both of you to be the same alignment... Dont know what you mean my Appeal emotion

be sure to look at Drench (this addressed to the rest of the townies)


...which makes this kinda redundant. aye, but it must have been stated, you would assume the same if both ace and myself turn up town

Also "addressed to the rest of the townies"? Isn't everyone trying to be town here? Was that part really necessary? probably not, but I wanted to make sure that everyone knew it was for them, and not specifically addressed to you (do to the quote)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Natewolfman
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: omaha, NE

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Drench on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:08 pm

edit
Last edited by Drench on Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cook Drench
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:02 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Natewolfman on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:23 pm

only 1 part of that I think you needed me to answer, again in red
Drench wrote:
ace is scum, though you painted a huge target on my back, and will likelly end up getting lynched because of it.


One question:

Why is Ace scum in your opinion excluding my line of reasoning? because I know I am not, therefor if your resoning is correct then he must be scum, no?

I did ask for reasons other than my reasoning. How about other instances?

I have none, as I said it was all working off the assumption that you are 100% flawlessly correct and that either Ace or I am scum, and since i know 100%(though everyone else may not) that I am not scum, then logically ace is. Again this is all just *IF* everything in your post is in the exact right direction

User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Natewolfman
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: omaha, NE

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Drench on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:31 pm

edit
Last edited by Drench on Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cook Drench
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:02 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Natewolfman on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:34 pm

Drench wrote:
Natewolfman wrote:only 1 part of that I think you needed me to answer, again in red
Drench wrote:
ace is scum, though you painted a huge target on my back, and will likelly end up getting lynched because of it.


One question:

Why is Ace scum in your opinion excluding my line of reasoning? because I know I am not, therefor if your resoning is correct then he must be scum, no?

I did ask for reasons other than my reasoning. How about other instances?

I have none, as I said it was all working off the assumption that you are 100% flawlessly correct and that either Ace or I am scum, and since i know 100%(though everyone else may not) that I am not scum, then logically ace is. Again this is all just *IF* everything in your post is in the exact right direction



So, you're saying you don't trust my reasoning, and that people should look at me, and yet the only reason you suspect Ace is because of the very reasoning you distrust? I smell a contradiction.

? no thats not what I said, in fact I do trust what you are saying, it seems logical, I mentioned before too many specifics make me uneasy, but your line of thinking seems rational enough. What I was saying is that what you say seems logical BUT if neither myself or ace turn up skum they should look at you, that is all.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Natewolfman
 
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: omaha, NE

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Drench on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:37 pm

edit
Last edited by Drench on Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cook Drench
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:02 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Its Bolt on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:37 pm

Vote Count

Natewolfman (2) - Drench

Not Voting (7) - LSU Tiger Josh, animorpherv1, Sierra_Leon, farside22, /, Natewolfman, ace1217
Holy crap! Its Bolt the super dog!
User avatar
Lieutenant Its Bolt
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:43 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby / on Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:04 pm

animorpherv1 wrote:<not needed> Of course, i had no action.

That's a good thing, considering my dad took it all of 2 days ago.

Huh, so if you were a SK and had an action to send in, you wouldn't have been able to send it?
Not that I'm saying you are, but still we can't completely rely on roleblocking theories when there are potentially missed actions.
Sergeant 1st Class /
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby ace1217 on Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:43 am

I'm rather disappointed you blocked me farside, because I watched MM last night, but I was blocked. Also, one of the killers may have attempted to kill me last night, due to the fact I was jailkept, however, I survived. The roleblockings may be irrelevant.
Cadet ace1217
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:00 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Sierra_Leon on Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:07 pm

Hi, I was gone for a few days but I'm back now. I haven't read up yet, and I'm not sure when I'll have time for it. Hopefully soon, but Friday at latest.
Image
User avatar
Major Sierra_Leon
 
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby animorpherv1 on Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:26 pm

Its Bolt wrote:[color=blue]Vote Count

Natewolfman (2) - Drench


:?: :?: ;) 8-[
User avatar
Cook animorpherv1
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: In your mind, messing with your thoughts

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby farside22 on Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:31 pm

Ace: I had thought your actions about derf lynched and leaned scum. However I will conceed that it is possible I saved you from being killed by jailing you.
That leaves Nate. I do agree with Drench with one kill only that leaves either Ace or Nate as scum or serial killer. I'm believing that shot night 1 is flavor for scum but I could be wrong.
With that I will give ace the bennifit.

vote: Nate
User avatar
New Recruit farside22
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby Its Bolt on Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:23 pm

Vote Count

Natewolfman (3) - Drench, farside22

Not Voting (6) - animorpherv1, LSU Tiger Josh, Sierra_Leon, /, Natewolfman, ace1217

With 8 alive it takes five to lynch
Deadline is now February 19th at 11:00 AM PST
Holy crap! Its Bolt the super dog!
User avatar
Lieutenant Its Bolt
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:43 am

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby ace1217 on Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:03 pm

Vote nate since he's likely scum and going without a lynch today would be bad.
Cadet ace1217
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:00 pm

Re: IB - Super Smash Smalltown (Day Three)

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:05 pm

Vote Nate let's get the lynch and finish off the mafia hopefully and then nail the sk.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users