Moderator: Community Team
Lone.prophet wrote:than the third card u need for 3 different is 33% so it evens out
dancingchiapet wrote:Change Refund Amounts for Flat Rate games
I came across this when playing risk with some friends.
In regards to a flat rate games where the pay out is 4,6,8, or 10, 10 obviously should be given to the rarest card combination. Currently, 10 armies is paid out for one color of each, but it is in fact the most likely card combination. Here is the math:
For the Classic map there are 42 territories/cards made up by 14 reds, 14 greens, and 14 blues.
Let us look at a hypothetical situation in which only one player is recieving cards and always draws the most likely color.
Player one recieves a red card. This means in the deck there are 13 reds, 14 greens, and 14 blues. This means that player one will most likely next draw a green or a blue (because there are more in the deck). Going along with that we'll say player one next draws a green card. This means the deck now is made up of 13 reds, 13 greens, and 14 blues. Blue is the most likely card to get next, which will give player one 10 armies.
There are a bunch of different senarios depending on the different number of players, but it is never harder to get one color of each, statistically speaking.
Going just by math alone it would probably make the most sense to have a set of the same color be worth the same as any other color, since they all have the same probabilitiy. So possibly 10 armies for 3 cards of the same color and 6 armies for a set of one of each color.
A very easy change though would simply be: 4 for 1 of each, 6 for 3 red, 8 for 3 green, 10 for 3 blue.
The priority is only about a 2, but it is still something that needs to be looked at at some point.
dancingchiapet wrote:Lone.prophet wrote:than the third card u need for 3 different is 33% so it evens out
alright, so lets draw this out using the most likely possibility.
draw red card.
13 red, 14 green, 14 blue
draw green card.
13 red, 13 green, 14 blue.
the most likely card is blue because the are the most left in the deck, plain and simple. if i need to draw this out further, ill do it later today.
spiesr wrote:Since conquer club doesn't use a "real deck" the colors of cards are assinged when you get them so you always have 1/3 chane of getting any color.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
spiesr wrote:Since conquer club doesn't use a "real deck" the colors of cards are assinged when you get them so you always have 1/3 chane of getting any color.
sully800 wrote:No, once a card is chosen it is out of the deck until it is played. I remember lack saying that before (so you could never draw two of the same card at once). I also believe the colors are randomly assigned, which shoots this whole suggestion to hell, but I'm not sure.
everywhere116 wrote:spiesr wrote:Since conquer club doesn't use a "real deck" the colors of cards are assinged when you get them so you always have 1/3 chane of getting any color.
As I was reading this thread I was thinking that same very point. I have seen games when someone got a card as one color and the next person to get the same got it in another color.
boberz wrote:mathmatically dancingchia pet is correct. However i believe that in the interests of the game (for reasons stated by other people) it should not be changed. I think it was quite sad to spend quite as much time as it seems you have on this. Perhaps if you want to limit amount of luck created by cards, play no card games. However in future i agree this could be an option in creating a game (along with flat rate, escalating and no cards) but at such a low priority it would never be worth doing, sorry.
dancingchiapet wrote:There is no reason to insult me for bringing this up. This is a suggestion board for any subject that might improve upon the game and thats all I am trying to do by bringing this up. I know it's a low priority and I clearly stated that in my original post. If it's so sad to read what I've typed, just don't worry about it.
dancingchiapet wrote:boberz wrote:mathmatically dancingchia pet is correct. However i believe that in the interests of the game (for reasons stated by other people) it should not be changed. I think it was quite sad to spend quite as much time as it seems you have on this. Perhaps if you want to limit amount of luck created by cards, play no card games. However in future i agree this could be an option in creating a game (along with flat rate, escalating and no cards) but at such a low priority it would never be worth doing, sorry.
There is no reason to insult me for bringing this up. This is a suggestion board for any subject that might improve upon the game and thats all I am trying to do by bringing this up. I know it's a low priority and I clearly stated that in my original post. If it's so sad to read what I've typed, just don't worry about it.
IT3USN wrote:just out of curiosity, what are the cahnces of someone getting 10 strait red cards in a flat rate game? cause it is happening to me!!! well, 10 and counting.....we'll see how long this keeps up.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users